Posted on 09/02/2007 11:30:37 AM PDT by doug from upland
The Spiderman-gate is what Stan is facing. He is being sued for bankruptcy fraud and looting the SLM bankruptcy to form his new company. There is compelling evidence in that case.
I second the nomination, and deposit my lipstick on Doug’s cheek. I understand his face is already covered with lipstick from all the ladies who got here before me.
Married while in prison? State/Civil???? I thought you lost your civil rights while in prison. Why isn’t that obstruction?
Ping!
Are the campaign contributions noted in the demand letter hand deliverd to Sen. Hillary Clinton by Peter Paul part of this case?
The civil case is about the business fraud. Peter was induced to spend money on her campaign with the promise that Clinton would work for SLM for one year as a rainmaker when he left the WH. He was to get 15-17 mil in stock and cash.
Instead of working for the company, they destroyed the company. Behind the scenes the Clinton business advisor Jim Levin, who was gaining proprietary info from the company while vetting the offer for Bill, used the info to steal the Japanese business partner, Tendo Oto. Oto had already given $5 mil for the Asian partnership and promised another 5-7 mil in November 2000. Because of the interference by Levin, Oto’s money did not come as promised in November. The company had a cash crunch and failed.
There is evidence of what Levin did. The most compelling is the recording of a business partnership with Oto with the Sec. of State in Illinois just six days after she was elected.
What discovery and trial are going to show is Hillary’s involvement with the money. The smoking gun video was only obtained by Peter within the last several months. Before that, Hillary would be able to contend that she had nothing to do with it. The FEC ruled she had nothing to do with the false reporting and FEC fraud without having that video evidence. They never even called her to testify. They never called Kelly Craighead to testify. The civil case is going to expose the fraud that has been so far hidden.
After two false FEC filings claimed Event 39 was only $366,000, Peter filed his civil suit in June 2001. On July 11, Kendall accepted service for her. Included were cancelled checks, invoices, and bank statements documenting $1.6 mil he spent. A few days later at the National Press Club, they held a news conference. A messenger hand delivered the demand letter to her senate office.
Despite the fact that she was in possession of the information, she allowed her treasurer, Andrew Grossman, to file a third fraudulent FEC report on July 30, 2001. That report claimed $401,000 for Event 39.
bump
I win the lottery, get struck by lightning 6 times. If found guilty the fine will be forcing her to never say another "You Know".
Get the popcorn out. BTW has any of us here in So Cal contacted the OC Register & what response.
You mean another snafu.
Yep, The corrupt "Two-Party Cartel". How do you end it? Vote outside of these two parties.
I never thought of this. Why not. The media will be cover for them.
Other than here, I have not seen anything on this story in any news media anywhere. What gives?
I don’t know whether they will be found liable. A jury is going to decide. What is most critical for the country, however, is the discovery from deposition and the testimony and evidence at trial.
World Net Daily has reported. I have been on a few talk shows. New Media Journal did a 7-part series. Hillary’s spin team has been successful attacking Peter personally as a felon and someone not to be believed. For goodness sakes, that is what a federal judge appointed by Clinton said before a word of evidence was heard in the David Rosen trial. The prosecutor also said that Hillary had no involvement. That is hard to overcome, especially where there is a press that either loves Hillary or is afraid of her. No one wanted to take the lead and be out there reporting. Perhaps the Norman Hsu case has changed that.
PLEASE don’t tip your hand, Doug. Just give us daily updates. She lurks and has hundreds at her disposal.
Not show up? Would a person running for president not show up for a subpoena signed by a judge compelling her to give a deposition? Would they like a $30 million default judgment entered against them? They have assets to go after.
Remember that a sitting president showed up to testify before a grand jury. His wife had to sign a check that paid a big chunk of the 900K settlement to Paula Jones. They made that settlement after the first round. They didn’t want to risk an appeal.
“The Justice System Integrity Division, which Cooley created, has also filed an unprecedented 24 cases against corrupt attorneys and achieved a 100 percent conviction rate.”
Thanks for this Newfy. The best 25 words I have read in a long, long time and would like to see repeated. By the way, does this DA Cooley guy hire out to other judicial districts?
Many of us here in Hawaii would pay extra or whatever it took to get this kind of result. I imagine there are other places who would get in on the bidding for this guy’s services as well.
Mahalo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.