Posted on 09/02/2007 11:30:37 AM PDT by doug from upland
AN UNWANTED CAMPAIGN STOP FOR HILLARY IN 2008 - Los Angeles Superior Court
DATELINE Los Angeles
FreeRepublic.com
Doug from Upland
It is called the “Stanley Mosk Courthouse” after the man who was the longest serving justice on the California Supreme court, 37 years, from 1964-2001. The address is 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, California 90012.
During the campaign of 2008, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton will be paying a visit, but it won’t be by choice. She won’t be sitting in the lawyer chair. She will be sitting in the witness/defendant chair.
The case is Paul v Clinton, an historic civil case involving an impeached former president and sitting senator accused of a committing business fraud and collapsing a public company, Stan Lee Media. Yes, “Spiderman” Stan Lee. The case is expected to highlight information over which the mainstream media has maintained a cone of silence. That information is the greatest campaign finance fraud in history and the compromising of all three branches of government by a senator whose power is second only to that of the President of the United States. Many journalists, newspaper editors, and TV and radio news shows are in possession of a wealth of information about the case that has been discussed on the phone with them and sent to them. It includes compelling documents, photos, and video of Hillary Clinton.
On September 7, 2007, a 3-judge panel of the California Appellate Court will hear oral arguments in the case. Despite having been alerted, the mainstream media has not seen fit to report that news. Apparently it did not meet the criteria pursuant to the masthead logo of the NY TIMES - “All the news that’s fit to print.” Some news is more fit than others.
Clinton counsel David Kendall of the powerful Washington DC law firm, Williams and Connolly, will endeavor to convince the three justices that his client is not a felon, should remain protected by California’s anti-SLAPP law, and should not join her husband and others as defendants. The court should quickly make its decision, and discovery can then proceed. If Kendall loses, he may appeal to the California Supreme Court. That procedure is not expected to be a lengthy one, and the court ruled previously that it would not throw out the case regarding the former impeached president.
*** For full disclosure and in fairness to Mr. Kendall, I can say unequivocally that I have not seen him sit on his briefcase during any of the hearings I've attended.
Even if she is not brought back into the case as a defendant, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is going to be under oath. At a hearing in 2006, the Superior Court trial judge, Aurelio Munoz told Kendall, “I will entertain no motion that prevents Mrs. Clinton from testifying……did you hear that, Mr. Kendall?”
The court case of a former impeached president and a sitting senator might normally be a headline generator. Unfortunately, the shameless partisanship of the mainstream media is on display as never before. It is there for everyone to see.
As background for those who may not be familiar with the issues in the case, that would be viewers of CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC and readers of the NY Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, Chicago Sun Times, Boston Globe, Denver Post, Dallas Morning News, Seattle Post Intelligencer, Detroit Free Press, Philadelphia Inquirer, Minneapolis (Red)Star Tribune, The Plain Dealer, the Arizona Republic, Houston Chronicle, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Miami Herald, DesMoines Register, Arkansas Democrat Gazette, TIME Magazine, Newsweek, US News & World Report…….…well, you get the idea --- we are glad to be of service and welcome aboard. Here are some links that you might find helpful.
To anyone from the mainstream media who is just starting the learn about the greatest campaign finance fraud in history, I welcome you. We have regular and Decaf, and I’ll even supply some donuts. Get busy reading. Don’t you think it is about time to do your job? Does the word “journalist” mean something to you?
ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS: HILLCAP DOT ORG
EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION SITE with latest documentary trailer: EJFA DOT ORG
THE TIMELINE: This tells the story with links
THIS ILLEGAL DONATION (with photos) FROM A JAPANESE NATIONAL HAS NEVER BEEN RETURNED OR REPORTED
THE LARGEST DONOR IN HISTORY HAS THREE TIMES DEMANDED THAT HILLARY RETURN HIS ILLEGAL DONATION
OH MY, "SPIDERMAN" STAN LEE ADMITTING TO "EXCHANGING CHECKS" IN HIS VIDEO DEPOSITION....WHOOPS!
THE SMOKING GUN VIDEO. An agent of Hillary, a White House employee, helped solicit a 1.6 mil in-kind contribution. This video is evidence of Hillary's knowledge, involvement, approval, and participation.
HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE "IRREGULARITIES" REPORTED TO THE FBI FIELD OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES
HILLARY SPOKESMAN HOWARD WOLFSON HAS MAINTAINED THE LIE FOR SEVEN YEARS
TRUTH BOATING HILLARY CAMPAIGN - we need your help to break the news blockade of the mainstream media
ART MOORE'S WND STORY ABOUT THE TRUTH BOATING HILLARY CAMPAIGN
MOMMY DEAREST SETS UP CHELSEA FOR PERJURY
DO NOT MISS THE 7-PART "FRAUDULENT SENATOR" SERIES
AND FINALLY, JOIN ME IN A FUN SING-ALONG
The Spiderman-gate is what Stan is facing. He is being sued for bankruptcy fraud and looting the SLM bankruptcy to form his new company. There is compelling evidence in that case.
I second the nomination, and deposit my lipstick on Doug’s cheek. I understand his face is already covered with lipstick from all the ladies who got here before me.
Married while in prison? State/Civil???? I thought you lost your civil rights while in prison. Why isn’t that obstruction?
Ping!
Are the campaign contributions noted in the demand letter hand deliverd to Sen. Hillary Clinton by Peter Paul part of this case?
The civil case is about the business fraud. Peter was induced to spend money on her campaign with the promise that Clinton would work for SLM for one year as a rainmaker when he left the WH. He was to get 15-17 mil in stock and cash.
Instead of working for the company, they destroyed the company. Behind the scenes the Clinton business advisor Jim Levin, who was gaining proprietary info from the company while vetting the offer for Bill, used the info to steal the Japanese business partner, Tendo Oto. Oto had already given $5 mil for the Asian partnership and promised another 5-7 mil in November 2000. Because of the interference by Levin, Oto’s money did not come as promised in November. The company had a cash crunch and failed.
There is evidence of what Levin did. The most compelling is the recording of a business partnership with Oto with the Sec. of State in Illinois just six days after she was elected.
What discovery and trial are going to show is Hillary’s involvement with the money. The smoking gun video was only obtained by Peter within the last several months. Before that, Hillary would be able to contend that she had nothing to do with it. The FEC ruled she had nothing to do with the false reporting and FEC fraud without having that video evidence. They never even called her to testify. They never called Kelly Craighead to testify. The civil case is going to expose the fraud that has been so far hidden.
After two false FEC filings claimed Event 39 was only $366,000, Peter filed his civil suit in June 2001. On July 11, Kendall accepted service for her. Included were cancelled checks, invoices, and bank statements documenting $1.6 mil he spent. A few days later at the National Press Club, they held a news conference. A messenger hand delivered the demand letter to her senate office.
Despite the fact that she was in possession of the information, she allowed her treasurer, Andrew Grossman, to file a third fraudulent FEC report on July 30, 2001. That report claimed $401,000 for Event 39.
bump
I win the lottery, get struck by lightning 6 times. If found guilty the fine will be forcing her to never say another "You Know".
Get the popcorn out. BTW has any of us here in So Cal contacted the OC Register & what response.
You mean another snafu.
Yep, The corrupt "Two-Party Cartel". How do you end it? Vote outside of these two parties.
I never thought of this. Why not. The media will be cover for them.
Other than here, I have not seen anything on this story in any news media anywhere. What gives?
I don’t know whether they will be found liable. A jury is going to decide. What is most critical for the country, however, is the discovery from deposition and the testimony and evidence at trial.
World Net Daily has reported. I have been on a few talk shows. New Media Journal did a 7-part series. Hillary’s spin team has been successful attacking Peter personally as a felon and someone not to be believed. For goodness sakes, that is what a federal judge appointed by Clinton said before a word of evidence was heard in the David Rosen trial. The prosecutor also said that Hillary had no involvement. That is hard to overcome, especially where there is a press that either loves Hillary or is afraid of her. No one wanted to take the lead and be out there reporting. Perhaps the Norman Hsu case has changed that.
PLEASE don’t tip your hand, Doug. Just give us daily updates. She lurks and has hundreds at her disposal.
Not show up? Would a person running for president not show up for a subpoena signed by a judge compelling her to give a deposition? Would they like a $30 million default judgment entered against them? They have assets to go after.
Remember that a sitting president showed up to testify before a grand jury. His wife had to sign a check that paid a big chunk of the 900K settlement to Paula Jones. They made that settlement after the first round. They didn’t want to risk an appeal.
“The Justice System Integrity Division, which Cooley created, has also filed an unprecedented 24 cases against corrupt attorneys and achieved a 100 percent conviction rate.”
Thanks for this Newfy. The best 25 words I have read in a long, long time and would like to see repeated. By the way, does this DA Cooley guy hire out to other judicial districts?
Many of us here in Hawaii would pay extra or whatever it took to get this kind of result. I imagine there are other places who would get in on the bidding for this guy’s services as well.
Mahalo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.