Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AN UNWANTED CAMPAIGN STOP FOR HILLARY IN 2008 - Los Angeles Superior Court
hillcap ^ | Sept. 2, 2007 | dfu

Posted on 09/02/2007 11:30:37 AM PDT by doug from upland

AN UNWANTED CAMPAIGN STOP FOR HILLARY IN 2008 - Los Angeles Superior Court

DATELINE Los Angeles
FreeRepublic.com
Doug from Upland

It is called the “Stanley Mosk Courthouse” after the man who was the longest serving justice on the California Supreme court, 37 years, from 1964-2001. The address is 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, California 90012.

During the campaign of 2008, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton will be paying a visit, but it won’t be by choice. She won’t be sitting in the lawyer chair. She will be sitting in the witness/defendant chair.

The case is Paul v Clinton, an historic civil case involving an impeached former president and sitting senator accused of a committing business fraud and collapsing a public company, Stan Lee Media. Yes, “Spiderman” Stan Lee. The case is expected to highlight information over which the mainstream media has maintained a cone of silence. That information is the greatest campaign finance fraud in history and the compromising of all three branches of government by a senator whose power is second only to that of the President of the United States. Many journalists, newspaper editors, and TV and radio news shows are in possession of a wealth of information about the case that has been discussed on the phone with them and sent to them. It includes compelling documents, photos, and video of Hillary Clinton.

On September 7, 2007, a 3-judge panel of the California Appellate Court will hear oral arguments in the case. Despite having been alerted, the mainstream media has not seen fit to report that news. Apparently it did not meet the criteria pursuant to the masthead logo of the NY TIMES - “All the news that’s fit to print.” Some news is more fit than others.

Clinton counsel David Kendall of the powerful Washington DC law firm, Williams and Connolly, will endeavor to convince the three justices that his client is not a felon, should remain protected by California’s anti-SLAPP law, and should not join her husband and others as defendants. The court should quickly make its decision, and discovery can then proceed. If Kendall loses, he may appeal to the California Supreme Court. That procedure is not expected to be a lengthy one, and the court ruled previously that it would not throw out the case regarding the former impeached president.

*** For full disclosure and in fairness to Mr. Kendall, I can say unequivocally that I have not seen him sit on his briefcase during any of the hearings I've attended.

Even if she is not brought back into the case as a defendant, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is going to be under oath. At a hearing in 2006, the Superior Court trial judge, Aurelio Munoz told Kendall, “I will entertain no motion that prevents Mrs. Clinton from testifying……did you hear that, Mr. Kendall?”

The court case of a former impeached president and a sitting senator might normally be a headline generator. Unfortunately, the shameless partisanship of the mainstream media is on display as never before. It is there for everyone to see.

As background for those who may not be familiar with the issues in the case, that would be viewers of CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC and readers of the NY Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, Chicago Sun Times, Boston Globe, Denver Post, Dallas Morning News, Seattle Post Intelligencer, Detroit Free Press, Philadelphia Inquirer, Minneapolis (Red)Star Tribune, The Plain Dealer, the Arizona Republic, Houston Chronicle, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Miami Herald, DesMoines Register, Arkansas Democrat Gazette, TIME Magazine, Newsweek, US News & World Report…….…well, you get the idea --- we are glad to be of service and welcome aboard. Here are some links that you might find helpful.

To anyone from the mainstream media who is just starting the learn about the greatest campaign finance fraud in history, I welcome you. We have regular and Decaf, and I’ll even supply some donuts. Get busy reading. Don’t you think it is about time to do your job? Does the word “journalist” mean something to you?

ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS: HILLCAP DOT ORG

EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION SITE with latest documentary trailer: EJFA DOT ORG

THE TIMELINE: This tells the story with links

THIS ILLEGAL DONATION (with photos) FROM A JAPANESE NATIONAL HAS NEVER BEEN RETURNED OR REPORTED

THE LARGEST DONOR IN HISTORY HAS THREE TIMES DEMANDED THAT HILLARY RETURN HIS ILLEGAL DONATION

OH MY, "SPIDERMAN" STAN LEE ADMITTING TO "EXCHANGING CHECKS" IN HIS VIDEO DEPOSITION....WHOOPS!

THE SMOKING GUN VIDEO. An agent of Hillary, a White House employee, helped solicit a 1.6 mil in-kind contribution. This video is evidence of Hillary's knowledge, involvement, approval, and participation.

HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE "IRREGULARITIES" REPORTED TO THE FBI FIELD OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES

HILLARY SPOKESMAN HOWARD WOLFSON HAS MAINTAINED THE LIE FOR SEVEN YEARS

TRUTH BOATING HILLARY CAMPAIGN - we need your help to break the news blockade of the mainstream media

PETER PAUL PASSES POLYGRAPH

ART MOORE'S WND STORY ABOUT THE TRUTH BOATING HILLARY CAMPAIGN

MOMMY DEAREST SETS UP CHELSEA FOR PERJURY

DO NOT MISS THE 7-PART "FRAUDULENT SENATOR" SERIES

AND FINALLY, JOIN ME IN A FUN SING-ALONG


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: cfr; crimeandpunishment; hillary; hillaryenabledrape; hillaryscandals; mccainfeingold; peterpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-168 next last
To: doug from upland

I go to bed every night praying that the Clintons get some comeuppance for all they did in the 90s.


81 posted on 09/02/2007 12:49:33 PM PDT by infidel29 (The US Military: Doing the job politicians don't want to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Mrs. Obama has the info. I sent it to her at her work. Edwards campaign chief Joe Trippi has it. I sent it to his home fax. Will they dare do anything about it?


82 posted on 09/02/2007 12:50:51 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy
the drive by’s will hurt themselves trying to cover this one up.............watch

Her campaign's about to go Krakatoa... and they're shoveling dirt over the maw. I bet they're all sighing with relief that they got Larry Craig tossed in their lap on Monday. An “All-Katrina-Week” would have been tough to justify.

83 posted on 09/02/2007 12:53:39 PM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

It can now be told. How time flies. I met almost four months ago in person with Newsweek’s Mike Isikoff and laid it all out for him. Either he didn’t really want to write the story or his editors wouldn’t let him write it. People are very worried about what Hillary would do to them if they dare cross her and she gets the power she is seeking.


84 posted on 09/02/2007 12:53:59 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
A subpoena will be very impressionable to Pellicano. He is another tangled web that nobody wants opened.
85 posted on 09/02/2007 1:01:34 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Smerconish on WPHT in Philadelphia might go for it, he being a lawyer


86 posted on 09/02/2007 1:04:50 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Doug, whatever the outcome of this case, I nominate you as Freeper of the Year for your outstanding and tireless work bringing this story to light.

You are a true patriot.

God bless you and keep you safe.

87 posted on 09/02/2007 1:05:43 PM PDT by Churchillspirit (We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; Churchillspirit

BTTT


88 posted on 09/02/2007 1:07:28 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: kjo
I agree. Imus had no live for Hillary. It was all a setup. Geraldo spoke of spitting on Malkin and so far I have heard no outrage.
89 posted on 09/02/2007 1:09:12 PM PDT by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Just curious but what would happen if Bill and Hillary never showed up? You know they both feel they are above the law and nothing can touch them and they can do as they please because of the judges they put in place during his presidency. What a blot on the American judicial system those two have been as well as the other two branches of government. Is there no way for truth, honesty and integrity to rise to the top and take these two out of the American body politic?


90 posted on 09/02/2007 1:13:05 PM PDT by Newfy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

I totally agree. Here we are, about a week away from the trial and not a word from any of the media. This is one of the biggest trials during this election. Where is everyone? Or are we not to trust any of them?


91 posted on 09/02/2007 1:16:59 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Great work, and thanks for informing us!


92 posted on 09/02/2007 1:19:08 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (All that is gold does not glitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Clinton counsel David Kendall of the powerful Washington DC law firm, Williams and Connolly, will endeavor to convince the three justices that his client is not a felon, should remain protected by California’s anti-SLAPP law, and should not join her husband and others as defendants. The court should quickly make its decision, and discovery can then proceed. If Kendall loses, he may appeal to the California Supreme Court. That procedure is not expected to be a lengthy one, and the court ruled previously that it would not throw out the case regarding the former impeached president.

Thats the rub. Kendall isn't going to loose. The fix is in. 3 liberal California judges will agree with Kendall and dismiss the case. She walks.

93 posted on 09/02/2007 1:23:41 PM PDT by Bommer (“He that controls the spice controls the universe!” (unfortunately that spice is Nutmeg!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Perhaps a catchy name that would help force the media to talk about it............maybe............ “Spiderman-gate” ?


94 posted on 09/02/2007 1:25:26 PM PDT by AwesomePossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Have depositions been taken and have they been transcribed?

Do we have any dates of when the party begins?


95 posted on 09/02/2007 1:29:09 PM PDT by casino66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Keep up the good work, Doug, and keep safe.

Do Me a favour though, mate, will ya? Make sure you have people on your team that know the difference between 'lose' and 'loose', as the judge is not going to be too impressed with someone's intellectual grasp that does not -thereby lessening your attempt significantly. Word of experience here...

96 posted on 09/02/2007 1:30:40 PM PDT by Utilizer (What does not kill you... -can sometimes damage you QUITE severely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

bump


97 posted on 09/02/2007 1:32:19 PM PDT by GOP_Proud (Liberalism-turning common sense into nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: casino66

Discovery will begin sometime after this hearing. Let’s see what judges do.


98 posted on 09/02/2007 1:35:11 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

No one intends to depose Pellicano. By the way, while he is in prison and facing an upcoming trial, he remarried his ex so that she can’t be compelled to testify against him. That’s interesting, because I think she was helpful in the evidence that the prosecution has.


99 posted on 09/02/2007 1:36:54 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

You are not understanding. The California Supreme Court has already said Bill stays in the case. This appellate hearing will determine whether she is brought back in to join him as a defendant. In either case, the most important thing is that she is going to be under oath. The trial judge make that abundantly clear to Kendall.


100 posted on 09/02/2007 1:39:31 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson