Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Filipinos fight to be recognized as U.S. vets
northjersey.com ^ | September 5, 2007 | ELIZABETH LLORENTE

Posted on 09/05/2007 10:41:32 PM PDT by Coleus

They lived in the Philippines, but they were members of the U.S. armed forces. More than 200,000 of them fought during World War II. Tens of thousands died before the final hard-won triumph over Japan. But in the decades following the war, the title of U.S. veteran -- and resulting compensation -- has eluded them.  Now, Filipino-American World War II veterans, aided by their adult children, have stepped up a decades-long fight to get Congress to recognize them as bona fide U.S. veterans – a move that would qualify them for VA benefits.

"Our community has been lobbying for this bill for more than 40 years," said Ludivina Hughes, a Fair Lawn resident whose late father fought in World War II. "These men fought in this war, they fought side by side with Americans. Many of us fighting for them to be acknowledged are the sons and daughters of these veterans. We want the recognition that they deserve”.   Some North Jersey towns have large concentrations of Filipinos. Bergenfield was home to 3,133 people of Filipino ancestry in the 2000 census; New Milford had more than 1,000 residents reporting Filipino roots, and Dumont, Hackensack and Teaneck each reported more than 800. Jersey City, however, dwarfed them all, with nearly 16,000 residents of Filipino descent.

Fast facts


• Ferdinand Magellan reached the Philippines and claimed the archipelago for Spain in 1521. It remained under Spanish rule for nearly 400 years.

• Spain ceded the islands to the United States under the terms of the 1898 Treaty of Paris. The legacy of Spanish rule remains strong in the Philippines, where many people have Spanish names.

• Filipinos and Americans fought together against Japan until the Japanese surrendered in 1945. In 1946, the Philippine Islands became the independent Republic of the Philippines.

Source: U.S. State Department

* * *

By the numbers


Filipino versus Asian population. Estimates based on household population.

New Jersey Bergen County Passaic County Morris County

Filipinos 110,817 21,628 3,838 4,641

Total Asians 620,588 118,918 22,400 40,651

Rank Third (17.8 %) Third (18.2 %) Third (17.1 %) Third (11.4 %)

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005 American Community Survey

Proponents have met with the staffs of New Jersey's congressional delegation, traveled to Washington, D.C., to lobby and held forums to discuss the struggle for recognition. And the veterans and their families – who number in the dozens in New Jersey, and about 6,000 nationwide -- say victory has seldom seemed as close as it does now.  After similar so-called equity bills have died in congressional committees over the years, this summer committees in both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives approved measures that acknowledge the Filipinos' wartime service and declare them eligible for full benefits. At the same time, Congress raised the    budget for veterans' health care by billions of dollars.  And it has all come as the growing Filipino-American community has grown more vocal. They plan to lobby more assertively this fall, when the bill may come up for votes in both houses of Congress.

"It's a matter of honor, our dignity," said Fred Diaz, a 90-year-old veteran in Jersey City who heads a Filipino veterans group. "I fought with the Americans, I stood up to the Japanese. The American soldiers and the Filipinos were all one; we did not treat each other as separate units."

Diaz, a prim, diminutive man with an easy smile, beams with pride when he speaks about his service.  One of his prized possessions is a tattered folder that holds documents – including the yellow-brown notice he received telling him he was drafted -- related to his wartime service and the struggle to regain U.S. veteran status. He always dons a uniform when he lobbies or takes part in demonstrations. He nearly always wears a Navy blue baseball cap that says "World War II veteran" in gold letters. A U.S.-born World War II veteran gave it to him, he said.  Now, he gets slightly more than $600 a month in Social Security benefits. If the bill passes, he said, his monthly income could rise to nearly $1,000. Moreover, Filipino veterans living in the United States could move back to their native homeland and still receive their full military pension – something not allowed now. Another veteran from Jersey City -- 85-year-old Jose Genito -- proudly speaks of his efforts during the war to shield a wounded commander from further attack by the Japanese.

"I ran out into the open field and tried to cover him, and I got hit by shrapnel," he said, recounting the story behind the leg wounds that earned him a Bronze Star medal. "Other people warned me that my leg was bleeding badly, but I had to try to help my commander."  Genito says that over time, each day that passes without action on the bill looms larger and larger. "It's been many years fighting for this, and we're in our twilight," he said. "We're in our 80s and 90s. Just since February, four veterans I knew from here in Jersey City have died."

Subject to draft

The designation of the Philippines as a U.S. territory before and during World War II enabled the United States to draft Filipinos, who were considered American nationals. They have all the legal protections that citizens have, but they do not have full political rights, such as the right to vote for president.  Under U.S. law during the war, Filipino veterans were entitled to U.S. military veteran benefits. But after the Philippines gained independence in 1946, Congress passed the 1946 Rescission Act, stripping the Filipinos who had served in World War II of their U.S. veteran status. Though most of the veterans have died, those still alive say they hope to see the day they can regain their veteran status. Most of the Filipinos who served during World War II, they point out, did not live to see measures passed in 2000 and 2003 that allowed for those living in the United States to receive care in VA hospitals and be buried in military cemeteries.

They live mainly on fixed incomes, and say they could use the monthly military pension that other veterans and their widows receive. Now, those living in the United States receive Social Security benefits, which is several hundred dollars less per month than the pension they would receive if the equity bill passes. But it is equally important to them, they say, to be rid of the "second class" cloud they say has hovered over them since World War II. They find it bewildering that they were U.S. nationals when they were drafted and while they fought – with more than 50,000 losing their lives in the war – only to see their status stripped. The equity bill also provides recognition to Filipino World War II veterans who remained in the Philippines. Under the measure, those veterans, who number about 12,000, would receive a smaller monthly pension than their counterparts in the United States.

Doing it for dad

Hughes' father, Francisco de Asis, was one of those who lived in the Philippines. He died when she was just 3, and before she and her mother came to the United States.  Her father was among roughly 80,000 Filipinos and Americans who fell captive to Japanese forces after a four-month battle. He was among those forced into the nearly two-week Bataan death march, but he escaped and hid in the home of a family for a few months, Hughes said.  "Somehow, he made it back home from that family house," she said. "He walked for about 10 hours, hiding through mountains so he wouldn't be seen and captured again, until he got to our house."  But even though the fight for recognition here has centered mostly on Filipino veterans living in the United States, Hughes says her passion for the equity bill is driven by the recognition that eluded her father.  He could have benefited from the extra hundreds of dollars per month, she said, that the bill would give to veterans living in the Philippines.

But mostly, she said, she still feels she owes it to her father to fight for the honor she said he still deserves. "He was proud of his service; he even kept a diary of it, which my brother in the Philippines has," she said. Rep. Bob Filner, chairman of the House Veterans' Affairs Committee and a longtime proponent of equitable status for the Filipino veterans, said the United States has an obligation "in both historical and moral terms" to provide them U.S. veteran status. He said that over the years, a reluctance to steer money from other veteran programs and a view that the Filipino veterans were "foreigners" have stymied his efforts to garner support for the bill. But he is more hopeful now that the measure has moved out of congressional committees, and the veteran affairs budget has increased by billions. "They helped us win the battle in the Pacific," said the California Democrat. "They held up the Japanese advance after Pearl Harbor for months and months so we had time to prepare." For his part, Diaz said he will continue to chase the dream of U.S. veteran status. "I am proud that I was able to contribute, help recover the Philippines from the Japanese," he said. "Why do I keep fighting for recognition? Well, because I'm still alive."



TOPICS: Government; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: arrgh; asia; eastasia; filipino; filipinos; history; philippines; seasia; southeastasia; veterans; vets; worldwar; worldwar2; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

1 posted on 09/05/2007 10:41:34 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Last time I looked, The Philippines was an independent country and its politicans were closing American bases to the spirited applause of their constituents.

You’re either independent or you’re not.


2 posted on 09/05/2007 10:46:19 PM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I rememeber meeting a Fillipino veteran in Vallejo California. He was a very nice fellow. Most Fillipino vets were paroled by the Japanese shortly after the Fall of Corregidor but many took the opportunity to join guerrilla units.


3 posted on 09/05/2007 10:46:44 PM PDT by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

All kinds of kudos to those old warriors.

I do have to wonder if we’ll see members of the French resistance units who fought alongside also attempting to claim VA benefits...


4 posted on 09/05/2007 10:47:13 PM PDT by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
If they had become US citizens that's one thing, but to have been in the US military as a foreigner and then returned/stayed in your home country after the war...

Wonder what Michelle Malkin thinks about this.

5 posted on 09/05/2007 11:00:29 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Triggerhippie

We gave more money to Japan after the war to rebuild than we gave to the Phillipines.

I’m more than willing to see these guys get their VA benefits.


6 posted on 09/05/2007 11:00:57 PM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
I’m pretty ambivalent on this one.

Can we really extend VA and pensions to every Tom, Dick and Harry that fought proxy for us?....

What about our boys who died there to free them from Jap butchers?

are they paying us...no, they ran us out last time I looked

it’s hard to save the whole world at once

if they gave us free base reign to counter the Red Chinese then geez...we might just happen to have some free medical there .

7 posted on 09/05/2007 11:09:04 PM PDT by wardaddy (the future of the West is bleak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

As they were considered U.S. nationals at the time and were subject to our draft, they deserve the status of U.S. Veterans and all that entails.


8 posted on 09/05/2007 11:14:43 PM PDT by skr (Car bombs and IEDs are the exclamation marks for the latest Democrats' talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

They were US nationals at the time of the fighting. So they should be considered US vets. Whether they should get VA benefits is another question. Many Filipino veterans immigrated to the US directly after the war and acquired citizenship. I don’t think there should be any doubt about their right to VA benefits. The ones that didn’t and stayed in the Philippines at the time of independence lost their status as US nationals. In my opinion, if a Filipino vet immigrated to the US and acquired US citizenship in a reasonable period after the war (maybe within 15 years) then they deserve to get VA benefits. Otherwise they have shown that they didn’t value US citizenship highly enough (not that that is an insult to Filipinos, but it should be disqualifying for US government benefits).


9 posted on 09/05/2007 11:15:11 PM PDT by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Give them the benefits.


10 posted on 09/05/2007 11:41:26 PM PDT by publana (Build the fence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

Filipino politicians are not the same as the Filipino people

The Filipinos were 80%+ for retaining the bases in 1991.

The politicos were trying to squeeze the last possible dollar out of the US for base agreements, and so delayed the treaty. The volcano intervened, and the US decided that rebuilding Clark AFB was not cost effective given the end of the Cold War. The Filipino politicians went around blaming each other for losing the bases, to deflect the popular disgust.

Even today, if the US were to propose installing new bases (pointless as that may be), the Filipinos would have a strong majority for them, which you may not hear because the media will focus on the tiny and noisy minority of leftists and ultra-nationalists.


11 posted on 09/05/2007 11:41:40 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: burzum

I quite agree with your opinion.


12 posted on 09/05/2007 11:43:11 PM PDT by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: skr

They were never subject to the US draft.

In 1941-42 they were subject to a draft for the Philippine Commonwealth, the status of which as an independent country was ambiguous. My grand-uncle was drafted and served on Bataan.

In 1942-46 they were not subject to any draft, and those who served as guerillas or in US or Philippine regular units were all volunteers. Several uncles fought as guerillas, though as far as I know none of them applied for benefits.


13 posted on 09/06/2007 12:29:51 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eternal_Bear

Only about 50% of those Filipinos who served on Bataan survived to be paroled by the Japanese. The rest died in battle, on the Death march, or, like a granduncle, from starvation and disease in the POW camps.


14 posted on 09/06/2007 12:41:35 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

There is a very strong case from the Filipino point of view that it was US strategy that put the Philippines on the Japanese invasion route. If the Philippines had been fully independent without US forces it could have negotiated an arrangement with Japan as did Thailand or French Indo-China, and escaped the worst of the war.

Alternately the US could have avoided war with Japan altogether had it wanted to, and thus also spared the Philippines. Or it could have put the war off for several years anyway.

President Quezon spent 1941 tearing his hair out about Roosevelts provoking the Japanese with embargoes, etc. He was terrified - with good reason, seeing the disasters that war brought. The cost of US strategy (which was eminently justified in the big picture) was paid partly by a ruined Philippines with a million dead.


15 posted on 09/06/2007 12:56:06 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

Japan attacked us, there was no reason to ‘put the war off for several years’. Doing so would not have made the situation any better


16 posted on 09/06/2007 1:21:20 AM PDT by GeronL (Fred Thompson '0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Where were these guys when the Philippines was throwing the U. S. out without so much as a “thank you.”
17 posted on 09/06/2007 1:26:37 AM PDT by Beckwith (dhimmicrats and the liberal media have .chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Why did Japan attack the US ?

a. Because it had been forced into a corner by US embargoes, of steel, oil, and eventually of credit, so that it could no longer trade to obtain raw materials. Its economy was facing collapse.

It had to choose between accepting Roosevelts ultimatums vs
continuing its war against China and its aggression against the European colonies in Asia.

If Roosevelt had let Japan do as it wished in Asia it would have happily done so without attacking the US or its Asian posessions.

That would have been better for the Philippines but much worse for the world. The Philippines paid dearly.


18 posted on 09/06/2007 1:40:28 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

The volcano threw the US out - or rather, the US chose to leave, post-volcano.

The Filipinos were all for the US staying, save for a noisy few. I saw Philippine polls throughout 1991 that had 80%+ in favor of the US bases.

I bet those Filipino polls were not reported by the US media, which no doubt concentrated on the nastiest anti-American leftists it could find to represent the Filipino point of view.


19 posted on 09/06/2007 1:43:46 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Triggerhippie

Did you miss this?

“Under U.S. law during the war, Filipino veterans were entitled to U.S. military veteran benefits. But after the Philippines gained independence in 1946, Congress passed the 1946 Rescission Act, stripping the Filipinos who had served in World War II of their U.S. veteran status.”

FRENCH “resistance” units obviously wouldn’t be entitled to U.S. benefits anymore than, say, British vets. That’s because they weren’t fighting on behalf of the U.S. as part of U.S. military units. The Filipinos were.


20 posted on 09/06/2007 1:55:41 AM PDT by Constantine XI Palaeologus ("Vicisti, Galilaee")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson