Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How I Didn’t Dismantle Iraq’s Army
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/06/opinion/06bremer.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin ^

Posted on 09/06/2007 8:27:35 AM PDT by lduucckkyy

September 6, 2007

Op-Ed Contributor

How I Didn’t Dismantle Iraq’s Army

By L. PAUL BREMER III

“The Iraqi Army of the future cannot be an extension of the present army, which has been made into a tool of dictatorship.” — Report by the Department of State’s Future of Iraq Project, May 2002

IT has become conventional wisdom that the decision to disband Saddam Hussein’s army was a mistake, was contrary to American prewar planning and was a decision I made on my own. In fact the policy was carefully considered by top civilian and military members of the American government. And it was the right decision.

By the time Baghdad fell on April 9, 2003, the Iraqi Army had simply dissolved. On April 17 Gen. John Abizaid, the deputy commander of the Army’s Central Command, reported in a video briefing to officials in Washington that “there are no organized Iraqi military units left.” The disappearance of Saddam Hussein’s old army rendered irrelevant any prewar plans to use that army. So the question was whether the Coalition Provisional Authority should try to recall it or to build a new one open to both vetted members of the old army and new recruits. General Abizaid favored the second approach.

In the weeks after General Abizaid’s recommendation, the coalition’s national security adviser, Walter Slocombe, discussed options with top officials in the Pentagon, including Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz. They recognized that to recall the former army was a practical impossibility because postwar looting had destroyed all the bases.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2007 8:27:37 AM PDT by lduucckkyy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lduucckkyy
On May 8, 2003, before I left for Iraq, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld gave me a memo titled “Principles for Iraq-Policy Guidelines” that specified that the coalition “will actively oppose Saddam Hussein’s old enforcers — the Baath Party, Fedayeen Saddam, etc.” and that “we will make clear that the coalition will eliminate the remnants of Saddam’s regime.” The next day Mr. Rumsfeld told me that he had sent the “Principles” paper to the national security adviser and the secretary of state.

Well, Paul, listening to Rumsfeld was your first mistake...the second was believing that Baathists would not again make good soldiers (because former SS Nazis once did in the reconstituted army of West Germany)...the trick was to weed out the hard core Sadaamists, leave the lukewarm Baathists, and have them swear the oath to their country instead of Sadaam.

2 posted on 09/06/2007 8:36:59 AM PDT by meandog ((Romney and Giuliani: Just like Bill Clinton, duplicitous draft-dodgers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lduucckkyy

I am glad Bremer and others are fighting back on the “failed war” meme.

Conservative and liberal hacks alike have taken to absurd characterizations of the Iraq war which has also been a great success.

Conservatives deserve to lose with they are not even willing to defend blatant successes like the Iraq war. Obsessed with some pathological sense of identity that requires ‘purifying” the party, some conservatives have done real damage to their own interests by agreeing to bad critiques of the Iraq war.

Saddam Hussein was a terrible ruthless dictator who used chemical weapons on his own people and wanted the world to believe he would increase his dangerous stockpiles. He is gone from this earth and Iraq is rapidly becoming the envy of the Arab world.

The pundits will soon eat W’s dust and I will relish the day.


3 posted on 09/06/2007 8:40:56 AM PDT by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lduucckkyy
By the time Baghdad fell on April 9, 2003, the Iraqi Army had simply dissolved. On April 17 Gen. John Abizaid, the deputy commander of the Army’s Central Command, reported in a video briefing to officials in Washington that “there are no organized Iraqi military units left.” The disappearance of Saddam Hussein’s old army rendered irrelevant any prewar plans to use that army. So the question was whether the Coalition Provisional Authority should try to recall it or to build a new one open to both vetted members of the old army and new recruits. General Abizaid favored the second approach.

I've attended talks by a major (may be a lt. colonel now) in Central Command who blames most of the problems in Iraq on Bremer. We made no attempt to call back the Iraqi Army and get them on a payroll and on our side. The only people willing to pay them were those interested in having them cause us trouble. A couple of times he needed some Iraqi troops, so he contacted the old commander and executive officer and got 85% of the unit back together within a couple of days.

If we had recalled the Iraqi military, got as many of them back into the barracks, paid them better than they were under Saddam and worried about de-Baathifying them later, they would have been available for both security and reconstruction work (and far cheaper than our contractors).

As it was, we had a bunch of armed, newly poor people with families to support. It would have been far cheaper both in money and lives to have paid them.

(No, I won't name him. One of the conditions for attending the talk was to not refer to him by name.)

4 posted on 09/06/2007 8:43:27 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67
Conservatives deserve to lose with they are not even willing to defend blatant successes like the Iraq war. Obsessed with some pathological sense of identity that requires ‘purifying” the party, some conservatives have done real damage to their own interests by agreeing to bad critiques of the Iraq war.

Huh? You have a few nuts like Buchanan and Paul. Other than that, conservatives are the only group that still support the war. You might notice that the Warners, Hagels, and their ilk are the wobbly ones (swaying with the breeze)--and they are hardly conservatives. The RINO's are working to stab Bush on the war much more seriously than the tiny fringe of conservatives (if you can call Buchanan and Paul conservatives) that oppose the war.

5 posted on 09/06/2007 8:53:24 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Bremer’s book is very interesting. It is all about people he met with and worked with. He worked to reach out to a broad spectrum of Iraqis and bring them into leadership to create a provisional government. That should work out a lot better than military rule ever does.


6 posted on 09/06/2007 9:03:16 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

I think you are largely correct. Coming from Ohio I can definitely identify with your point about the RINOS. Nonetheless, I wish conservatives— I guess in some sense neo conservatives would defend with more vigor. There seems to be some willingness to throw Rumsfeld overboard and view Petraus as the now proper strategy.

I do think taht Petraus work is good but it is the brillian response to a Democratic congressional win. Change course by upping the ante. That was shrewd and helped expose the Dems as empty suits and plummeted their popularity into the basement.


7 posted on 09/06/2007 9:54:31 AM PDT by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lduucckkyy

It was EXACTLY the right thing to do. Rummy was right. You cannot expect the Shiite population to respond to an institution that was so associated with the Saddam era. It would have been akin to bringing in entire units of Confederate soldiers to “protect” blacks in the South.


8 posted on 09/06/2007 10:07:10 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67
Exactly right. From WMDs to the "dissolution" of the Iraqi Army, the Administration NEVER, EVER should have backed off one iota---in fact, they should have been, in PR terms, on offense the whole time.

The minute they admitted there were no WMDs in Iraq, the PR war was 90% lost.

We did exactly the same thing with the Iraqi army that we did with the Wehrmacht.

9 posted on 09/06/2007 10:08:43 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Karl, I've heard just the opposite from high-ranking officers. So you can't use that as a basis for a judgment. The problem is, the army (as in ALL middle eastern countries) was associated with the regime. It wasn't an "Iraqi" army---it was SADDAM'S army. Every one of them had to be vetted, because if you didn't, you would have had all sorts of al-Qaeda types infiltrated the "new" army and the deaths would have been horrendous.

If you thought our guys were vulnerable with the disbanded army, it would have been 100 times worse with "embedded" al-Qaeda getting into the Green Zone on a regular basis as officers in the Iraqi army.

10 posted on 09/06/2007 10:11:17 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lduucckkyy
Rumsfeld & Wolfowitz screwed up this war big-time and we all are paying the price for it.
11 posted on 09/06/2007 10:14:24 AM PDT by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

You have been taking your fatuous idiot pills havent you ?

On your Home page I can see just how sick you are...Maybe you dont remember but Ronald Reagan was considered “The idiot” in his day


12 posted on 09/06/2007 10:15:09 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

Yea and didnt Eisenhower screw up WW2?


13 posted on 09/06/2007 10:17:53 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67
Conservatives deserve to lose with they are not even willing to defend blatant successes like the Iraq war

Reverse BDS.

14 posted on 09/06/2007 10:26:21 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Trails of troubles, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

Quite right

—except that it is Bin Laden and Zarqawi who screwed up and now Al Qaeda and all their allies who are paying the price for it.


15 posted on 09/06/2007 11:24:42 AM PDT by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: woofie
You have been taking your fatuous idiot pills havent you ?

Whassa matter Rummydummy? Are you still reeling over the "Der Autopen's" ouster and don't have anyone to give a mancrush to any longer...aww-w-w-w!

16 posted on 09/06/2007 1:22:58 PM PDT by meandog ((Romney and Giuliani: Just like Bill Clinton, duplicitous draft-dodgers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Yep you proved my point


17 posted on 09/06/2007 2:16:59 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lduucckkyy

thanks, bfl


18 posted on 09/06/2007 8:01:18 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

BINGO!

We have a winner...put down your markers...


19 posted on 09/06/2007 8:18:52 PM PDT by Crim (Dont frak with the Zeitgeist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy
"Rumsfeld & Wolfowitz screwed up this war big-time and we all are paying the price for it." No no no, my FRiend. This thing will pay for itself.
20 posted on 09/06/2007 9:11:12 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson