Skip to comments.
Too Sexy To Fly? (Southwest Airlines and the mini-mini skirt)
MSNBC ^
Posted on 09/08/2007 10:28:10 PM PDT by doesnt suffer fools gladly
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: endthematrix
You're right. (And I'm not picky) hahaha!
To: endthematrix
The funny thing in the video she pulls down her skirt and her top. I bet the shirt was up high and the skirt was pretty high also.
She’s not very old and her face has a real worn look of someone who has been in the fast lane.
To: luckystarmom
LOL! I was going to say looks 10yrs older.
23
posted on
09/08/2007 11:38:43 PM PDT
by
endthematrix
(He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
To: Tall_Texan
But the fantasy hit a quick ending when I could also notice armpit hair peeking out from under her arms. Yeah, that sort of ruins the moment.
(Note that I only said "sort of.")
;-)
24
posted on
09/08/2007 11:39:37 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
(Inventor of the 12-hour "power nap".)
To: doesnt suffer fools gladly
Should airlines have a dress code?
How about this - when airlines provide adequate seating space, on-time departures, adequate compensation for lost baggage, adequate compensation for getting bumped, adequate customer service in general, then they can start requesting that female passengers dress up to their standards. Until then, the airlines can keep their mouths shut and fly.
To: endthematrix
That’s the weirdest looking outfit I’ve ever seen. And the green color of that sweater-bra thingy...yikes. Looks like Mylanta. The overall look makes me want to take some Mylanta.
26
posted on
09/08/2007 11:54:43 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
How about his. It’s their airline and they set the standards. And all of the liberals who dare question their standards can walk. I’ll definitely remember that Southwest has standards and keeps skanks like this one in their low life place.
To: picard
Ummmm, just as a guess, were their any Molems involved in this?Them damn Molems crawl right up there everytime,
To: endthematrix; luckystarmom
How thoughtful for her to bring her sister along...
I'm bad - sorry. :O)
29
posted on
09/09/2007 12:00:44 AM PDT
by
jdm
Matt's in-depth investigation..
30
posted on
09/09/2007 12:11:17 AM PDT
by
D-fendr
To: doesnt suffer fools gladly
Well, I watched the link video, nice snatch shot. That said, I’ve seen worse. I think this is a bunch of whining about nothing, and the only reason we’re hearing about it is because the liberals from california smell money....
31
posted on
09/09/2007 12:13:59 AM PDT
by
ScreamingFist
(Annihilation - The result of underestimating your enemies. NRA)
To: american_ranger
How about his. Its their airline and they set the standards. And all of the liberals who dare question their standards can walk.
Right, like it takes a liberal to wonder why some Southwest employee who happens to share your prudish tastes sees fit to annoy paying passengers. Apparently the woman was not dressed in a manner that violated any decency laws. Southwest claims not to have any dress code other than those mandated by the law. The employee behaved in an immature, unprofessional manner. And the fact that this woman doesn't happen to dress in a manner that suits your tastes doesn't make her a "skank", Mr. Class.
To: idkfa; dighton
Another Southwest ad here.
Well......first they changed the dress code for the
stewardesses Flight Attendants, now one for the passengers.
33
posted on
09/09/2007 12:20:25 AM PDT
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
To: D-fendr
I’m sure he got to the bottom of it.
34
posted on
09/09/2007 12:20:49 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: american_ranger
Ill definitely remember that Southwest has standards and keeps skanks like this one in their low life place.
By the way, do you believe that there's any qualitative difference between what you said above and the rantings of some Muslim fundamentalist demanding that women keep covered? What is it that you guys who hate women in revealing clothes are so afraid of?
To: AnotherUnixGeek
36
posted on
09/09/2007 12:34:16 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: jdm
37
posted on
09/09/2007 12:39:40 AM PDT
by
Krankor
(kROGER)
To: doesnt suffer fools gladly
She looks much worn out for a 23 years old college attendee. I dont know the real reason for it, because I am not visiting porno sites, or I am not watching live cams from college girls dormitory. Kudos for Southwest Airlines reminding her, that an airplane is not a whore house and the passengers are not the customers waiting for her to advertise herself to the highest bidder. What belongs to a whore house, should stay in a whore house.
38
posted on
09/09/2007 12:41:47 AM PDT
by
OneHun
To: jackibutterfly
That’s what I’m thinking too—I bet she had quite a bit of her stomach showing.
To: doesnt suffer fools gladly
It is very short. It’s telling that they had to bleep her crotch on tv because it was showing. I think it’s good that Southwest asks women to dress in a modest way on their flights. It’s their company, and they should be allowed to do that. I was pleased with the comments too. I was expecting them to be in favor of her outfit, but many people felt it was too sleazy. It leads me to believe there is still some moral hope for America.
40
posted on
09/09/2007 1:55:45 AM PDT
by
Pinkbell
(Duncan Hunter 2008 - Protecting and Restoring America)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson