Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney didn't approve anti-Thompson site
Yahoo! News ^ | September 11, 2007 | Glen Johnson

Posted on 09/11/2007 8:50:15 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last
To: CharlesWayneCT

I just paid $52,500 in medical bills and care flight bills out of my own pocket from the injury of an independent sub-contractor by another independent sub-contractor (which I don’t legally owe, according to everyone) because the roughneck who was hurt was ultimately helping my company and it was the right thing to do, so yes.

Legal or not, the buck stopped with me.


21 posted on 09/11/2007 9:04:40 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

YES....I would think it would fall to my responsibility to ensure that people I hired acted in my or my companys best interest. I would follow through to make sure that the company I hired in my behalf took responsibility for those under their watch. Lacking that...I think should reflect on my own capabilities as a responsible leader.


22 posted on 09/11/2007 9:04:44 AM PDT by donnab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Wesley Donahue is NOT an advisor of any kind to the campaign.

Yes, I caught that after I posted, and was about to clarify when I saw this response.

he works for the same company

Well, that's a little ingenuous... he's a business partner, not just a casual co-worker. I would be more willing to accept that the guy acted on his own if this didn't fit the pattern of operation I've witnessed from the Romney campaign since April.

23 posted on 09/11/2007 9:04:48 AM PDT by kevkrom (The religion of global warming: "There is no goddess but Gaia and Al Gore is her profit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

Do you know everything being done by your business partners, or co-workers?

You think that his partner, knowing the value of deniability, WOULDn’T set up this site without telling him, precisely to keep that deniability?

As soon as they were told about it, Romney acted to have the site taken down. Most people who know about the site ONLY know about it because of Fred Thompson supporters posting about it.

He acted quickly and decisively. He denounced the tactic.


24 posted on 09/11/2007 9:04:59 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stm

Just like Mitt’s security force..


25 posted on 09/11/2007 9:05:19 AM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

The site was down before the newspapers reported about it. As soon as Romney heard about it, it was taken down.

The only reason we know what was on the site is that people are posting it and newspapers are reporting it.

And probably someone has a cache of it somewhere.


26 posted on 09/11/2007 9:06:16 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
. Most people who know about the site ONLY know about it because of Fred Thompson supporters posting about it.

Actually, it was the Washington Post that found and wrote about the smear site. And for it being not associated with the campaign, it somehow disappeared real fast once the Post contacted Romney's folks.

27 posted on 09/11/2007 9:07:04 AM PDT by kevkrom (The religion of global warming: "There is no goddess but Gaia and Al Gore is her profit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

The man responsible was not his staffer, he worked with Thompson, who was his advisor.

And he took “responsibility”, in that he reacted immediately, denounced the site, and the site was taken down.

I guess you can go through life not believing anything anybody says even when you have no evidence to the contrary. Sometimes you will be correct to doubt, and your hunches will be right.

It’s just not a fun way to live, always thinking ill of others and assuming you are being lied to.


28 posted on 09/11/2007 9:09:13 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I guess that puts Tompkins in the ‘inept businessman’ category.

Yes, I knew what my business partners/co-workers were doing when it came to something affecting the business I was in. I worked with people of integrity I trusted. It’s not hard to find them if one looks close enough. Or, hard enough.


29 posted on 09/11/2007 9:11:45 AM PDT by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
You think that his partner, knowing the value of deniability, WOULDn’T set up this site without telling him, precisely to keep that deniability?

He was pretty dumb to do so using the firm's resources, that's for sure. (In the initial stories, someone posted info that the "phonyfred" site was hosted as a sub-domain to the consulting firm.)

30 posted on 09/11/2007 9:13:55 AM PDT by kevkrom (The religion of global warming: "There is no goddess but Gaia and Al Gore is her profit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

The Web site, PhoneyFred.org, was created by Wesley Donehue, a business partner of Warren Tompkins, a South Carolina political operative on the Romney payroll and Romney's top adviser in the early voting state.

The connection still stands!

31 posted on 09/11/2007 9:14:20 AM PDT by dragonblustar (Freedom of Speech is for everyone, not just liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
The anti-Fred site started ages ago, by those associated with the Brownback campaign (conservativesgainstfred.wordpress.com), was much more cut-throat and devoid of any humor. Yet, it barely raised an eyebrow around here. Why not? Maybe because the Fredheads aren't threatened by Brownback?

There are anti sites out there on every candidate. In this day and age, it seems a little naive (and thin-skinned) not to expect it.

It is nothing compared to what the Clinton machine will dish out. If you can't stand the heat....

Wonder where all the articles are about Brownback's anti-Fred website?

Just like usual, anything Romney is treated with a double-standard by Fredheads.

32 posted on 09/11/2007 9:14:42 AM PDT by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I agree-the man responsible was a business partner of his advisor. And, for the moment, I'll believe what Romney said, that he knew nothing about this.

Given that, what does this say about the advisor, that he cannot even control his own business partner in what is clearly a very sensitive area for their firm? What's wrong with a memo to the entire staff of the firm saying "there will be absolutely NO activity related to the Republican Presidential nomination or candidates without it going through Toompkins first?

I also find it hard to believe that Tompkins' partner just did this thing all on his own, without the outright direction, or at least tacit approval, of Tompkins.

If I was in Romney's place, I'd ask Tompkins to resign, as a way of getting this thing behind the campaign, and as a warning to all other advisors/ad firms that they had better not engage in this kind of activity. But that is me.

33 posted on 09/11/2007 9:16:37 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Still, if Mitt doesn’t fire Tompkins, he has tacitly endorsed the website and it message. Plausible deniability has its limits.

Correcto!

Sort of like hitlery didn’t know anything about Hsu.... yeah right.


34 posted on 09/11/2007 9:16:49 AM PDT by dusttoyou (FredHead from the git go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
“The only reason we know what was on the site is that people are posting it and newspapers are reporting it.”

Well, that’s good then! If Romney didn’t have control it may have been left up. Good use of authority on Mitt’s part.

Now as long as the reporters report accurately no harm done.

Wonder if the Wayback Machine caught it.

35 posted on 09/11/2007 9:19:06 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What SISSIES !!!!

Negative Campaigning just isn’t what it used to be...

Bush castrated McCain and everyone KNEW it was Bush doing it.

But NOOOO... A Spoof site is all “Bad Mitt Baaaaaad Mitt”.

BAH.

I wish I had seen it... It was probably FUNNY !!

Get a life for the luv !!


36 posted on 09/11/2007 9:23:14 AM PDT by RachelFaith (Doing NOTHING... about the illegals already here IS Amnesty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is this the Hillary Clinton defence for the Republican side? I don’t know. I don’t remember.


37 posted on 09/11/2007 9:25:00 AM PDT by hoosierpearl (To God be the glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Plausible deniability was the intent, no doubt. But the deniability of this sleaze is no longer plausible.


38 posted on 09/11/2007 9:25:10 AM PDT by Petronski (Cleveland Indians: Pennant -13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

The story here is that Mitt had people do this who were dumb enough to get caught.


39 posted on 09/11/2007 9:25:23 AM PDT by kevkrom (The religion of global warming: "There is no goddess but Gaia and Al Gore is her profit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah right!

Not that I care, I wasn’t pulling for Romney anyway.


40 posted on 09/11/2007 9:26:08 AM PDT by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson