1) Novice pilots couldn't have flown the planes into buildings.
2) The fires couldn't have melted WTC 1 and 2, therefore they had to have been taken down with explosives.
3) The WTC 7 collapse couldn't have been caused by structural damage so it was taken down by explosives too.
4) Flight 93 was shot down.
5) The Pentagon was really struck by a missile.
We're dealing with some 32nd degree moonbats here.
I’m trying to remember the really weird one I heard. That Bush ordered the hit...?
Flight 93....had it continued and been in range of DC...might have eventually been shot down. There was a “intercept” in progress and some folks often debate that had the plane still been in the air 8-10 minutes later...it would have been up to the fighter-intercept whether they would have shot them down. My guess is that the fighter would have damaged the wing enough to force it down.
All that is pretty nifty for a doofas like Bush. Then he followed it up with the Katrina/NOLA nastiness. Wow...for a dumbass, he can wreck a lot of crap.
Rosie O’Donnell has said that fire couldn’t melt steel, so there are so many unanswered questions about what really happened on 9/11 in her mind. She must have advanced training in the laws of physics to understand all this.
If this is all they have, then I'd say most rational people should have no problem laying the smack down on these idiots.
So, how do they explain the missing airplane?
“5) The Pentagon was really struck by a missile.”
I have a good friend who actually watched in horror as the plane descended to the Pentagon that day.
Debunked.