Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: U.S.-born? So what?
Sacramento Bee ^ | 9/16/7 | Editor

Posted on 09/16/2007 5:29:00 PM PDT by SmithL

From its beginnings as a nation, the United States differed from Europe in its citizenship policies, welcoming all those born on U.S. territory as U.S. citizens.

Now Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Gold River, and 89 other Republican members of Congress want to end the tradition of birthright citizenship. Eleven of 19 Republicans in the California congressional delegation have signed on to sponsor this terrible bill (HR 1940) that would move the United States toward becoming a restrictionist nation of descent based on parentage.

In practical terms, if this bill passed, no longer could people born in the United States simply show a birth certificate to prove their citizenship.

Want a driver's license or a U.S. passport? You would not only need to dig up your birth certificate but the birth certificate, citizenship papers, green card or proof of active military service of one parent. A new bureaucracy would be necessary for determining the validity of a parent's citizenship.

Why would so-called "small government" conservatives want that kind of outcome?

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; anchorbaby; birthright; citizenship; immigrantlist; immigration; slavery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Freee-dame
I think that your parents would be considered "under the jurisdiction of the USA" which is the language in the constitution, IIRC.

They would have been, however, this bill is clear that only those born to US citizens, with no exception for legal residents, would become citizens.

21 posted on 09/16/2007 6:00:57 PM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
But this bill arguably (and it WILL be argued if it comes to it) conflicts with Amendment 14. So instead of being exposed to any number of state-level courts, it would inevitably be appealed through the infamous Ninth Circuit (Circus) court and further appealed all the way to the Supreme Court.

All we really need to do is stop the money! If we didn't provide free health care, WIC, Housing Subsidies, food stamps, etc to non-citizens the 'anchor baby' issue would go away. You get more of what you pay for, and our government is paying for illegals to have children at the same time that it is paying (through planned parenthood) for citizens to not have children, and paying for in-school programs encouraging our children to not have children. When we payed poor people not to work, we got a lot of non-working poor people; when we stopped paying them they stopped being 'non-working'.

22 posted on 09/16/2007 6:01:42 PM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This author is playing games.

It is about ILLEGAL ALIENS not legal residents.


23 posted on 09/16/2007 6:02:26 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

Regarding the 14th Amendment problem, illegal aliens are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, in my opinion. They presumably are subject to the jurisdiction of their countries of origin, unless you want to count our interactions with them in law enforcement or the simple fact that they are geographically inside our borders.


24 posted on 09/16/2007 6:04:12 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Oh, Geesh, not THIS crap AGAIN?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

I thought the bill simply mandated that one parent must be a U.S. Citizen or legal resident. Did you check thomas.gov about that?


25 posted on 09/16/2007 6:06:09 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Oh, Geesh, not THIS crap AGAIN?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
if an amendment is needed, I am positive the ‘Will of the People’ LEGAL Residents, would be heard overwhelmingly. None here is looking to cause grief to LEGAL residents of this nation. There could not be a law if LEGAL residents were penalized.....mho
26 posted on 09/16/2007 6:06:27 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (God Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform, Our Heroes. And Vote For Mr. Duncan Hunter, America! TLHNWY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I copied this quote - don’t remember from where but it could have been from here:

“We are NOT a nation of immigrants, but a nation of settlers and builders who created a nation that later immigrants desired to become a part of”


27 posted on 09/16/2007 6:06:29 PM PDT by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Funny how the enemedia wants to ape Europe when it comes to socialized medicine, an an unarmed populace and the nanny state. But when it comes to updating our citizenship laws they want to remain in the 18th century.


28 posted on 09/16/2007 6:07:44 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

If this law passed, do adults born here from non-citizen parents also lose citizenship?


29 posted on 09/16/2007 6:08:16 PM PDT by tbw2 (Science fiction with real science - "Humanity's Edge" by Tamara Wilhite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

It would be easy to note in BIG letters on the birth cert that the subject is the spawn of illegals and therefore also illegal.


30 posted on 09/16/2007 6:10:57 PM PDT by dbacks (I forgot to pay the rent on my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Found it:

`(b) Definition- Acknowledging the right of birthright citizenship established by section 1 of the 14th amendment to the Constitution, a person born in the United States shall be considered `subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States for purposes of subsection (a)(1) if the person is born in the United States of parents, one of whom is--

`(1) a citizen or national of the United States;

`(2) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States whose residence is in the United States; or

`(3) an alien performing active service in the armed forces (as defined in section 101 of title 10, United States Code).'.

That is fine with me.

31 posted on 09/16/2007 6:11:45 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Oh, Geesh, not THIS crap AGAIN?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
If you are in the country as an illegal alien and you give birth, your child is an illegal alien.

Nicely put, although I would prefer it to be more exclusive: Children born to non-citizens and non-permanent legal aliens are not citizens. This version would exclude children born to people legally here on temporary visas.
32 posted on 09/16/2007 6:13:11 PM PDT by FreedomFromGov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
If this law passed, do adults born here from non-citizen parents also lose citizenship?

I doubt it. That would violate the Consitution's ban on ex-post-facto law.

33 posted on 09/16/2007 6:13:28 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Oh, Geesh, not THIS crap AGAIN?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFromGov

The bill does exlude temporary visas. The aliens have to be admitted for permanent residence or serving in the armed forces.


34 posted on 09/16/2007 6:16:05 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Oh, Geesh, not THIS crap AGAIN?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The part (you posted) is certainly okay by me.....
Legal verses Illegal.....Appears defined very well
But I am not an attorney.......and the Supreme Court
will have the last word, one can bet......so now the election
is more important than ever.....
but I would hate to be the Supreme Court person
voting with the Illegals....
Such a vote would be the last nail, or nearly the last nail in America's sovereignty.
The world would have the citizens right where they want us....subservients, and 80% plus of the citizens of the nation would have been ignored. This is not a foundation for a continuing relationship between those in office and the citizens.....but who am I to predict.....a non-eventful outcome....should Illegals be given the day.....

All is well!....we can all go back to sleep now....just as congress, other assorted leaders, the world, and the media desire.....

NUTS! I choose to stay awake....

There is always a time when the elites are wrong....This is that time.

35 posted on 09/16/2007 6:23:59 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (God Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform, Our Heroes. And Vote For Mr. Duncan Hunter, America! TLHNWY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

You are correct.


36 posted on 09/16/2007 6:26:15 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

The key work here is “illegal”.

I’m assuming from what you’ve stated that your parents did everything according to the law. Though foreign nationals, they were here as legal residents. Upon citizednship they became naturalized citizens, or in other words, immigrants. This was all done according to our laws. Please understand that there is no such thing as an “illegal immigrant”.


37 posted on 09/16/2007 6:30:01 PM PDT by SatinDoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The bill does exlude temporary visas. The aliens have to be admitted for permanent residence or serving in the armed forces.

Perfect. Thanks for that info.
38 posted on 09/16/2007 6:30:58 PM PDT by FreedomFromGov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Dick Durbin has proposed these kids be kept here as long as they arrived before they were 16 years of age, and then put in the military where they could earn citizenship.

In short, at least one Democrat has proposed creating a Janissary system in the US very similar to the one used by the Turks.

39 posted on 09/16/2007 6:33:39 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
similar to the one used by the Turks
and the Romans.....
One has to watch those congresscritters full time....
or apply ointment....full time....
40 posted on 09/16/2007 6:36:59 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (God Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform, Our Heroes. And Vote For Mr. Duncan Hunter, America! TLHNWY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson