Skip to comments.
Editorial: U.S.-born? So what?
Sacramento Bee ^
| 9/16/7
| Editor
Posted on 09/16/2007 5:29:00 PM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: pnh102
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
If this law passed, do adults born here from non-citizen parents also lose citizenship? I doubt it. That would violate the Consitution's ban on ex-post-facto law.
The Lautenberg Gun Ban (for those accused of domestic violence and violators of domestic restraining orders) has retroactive effect.
The largest tax increase in U.S. history, signed by Bill Clinton, was applied retroactively to a date 20 days before his inauguration.
To: ml/nj
"subject to the jurisdiction thereof"This is KEY....aliens are not "subject to the jurisdiction, therof", but are subject to the jurisdiction of their home countries. The language has been twisted to include ANY foreigner who drops a baby here on U.S. soil, then the Liberals jump on the deportation of the illegals because "you're breaking up a family".
What a crock of steaming dung....
43
posted on
09/16/2007 6:44:02 PM PDT
by
traditional1
( Fred Thompson-The ONLY electable Republican Candidate)
To: SmithL
It would repeal a key part of the 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, which confirmed that principle: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." If these children were under U.S. jurisdiction, Vincente Fox wouldn't have spent the last decade championing their cause while they were on OUR soil. The Sacramento Bee is once again championing foreign nationa's supposed rights over our own. I wouldn't subscribe to this rag if it extended my life five years.
44
posted on
09/16/2007 6:47:25 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
To: longtermmemmory
45
posted on
09/16/2007 6:49:28 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: DoughtyOne
46
posted on
09/16/2007 6:52:12 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: stephenjohnbanker
He probably thinks the anchor baby Assembly Speaker is doing a terrific job.
To: SmithL
The people are pissed off about illegals.
You now have a choice: ignore them or pass the laws they want.
We’re supposed to be a government of, for and by the people...
48
posted on
09/16/2007 6:55:34 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: ruination
49
posted on
09/16/2007 6:57:21 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: SmithL
50
posted on
09/16/2007 7:01:22 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: ml/nj
"and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," meant something to the authors and ratifiers (such as they were) of the amendment.Are children born to foreign ambassadors who are not subject to US jurisdiction automatically US citizens? I think not.
Are children born to illegal entrants ignoring US jurisdiction automatically citizens? No, by the same argument.
51
posted on
09/16/2007 7:04:09 PM PDT
by
Poincare
To: SmithL
This is such a stupid editorial, I don’t even know where to begin!
52
posted on
09/16/2007 7:05:30 PM PDT
by
TheLion
(How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
To: stephenjohnbanker
53
posted on
09/16/2007 7:08:20 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
To: DoughtyOne
54
posted on
09/16/2007 7:23:10 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: TheLion
“This is such a stupid editorial, I dont even know where to begin!”
Best to write it off as an editorial “bad debt” :-)
55
posted on
09/16/2007 7:24:20 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: stephenjohnbanker
No new RINOS is a great one too, not that the other part isn’t something I could buy into.
56
posted on
09/16/2007 7:26:31 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
To: puppypusher
>>Why should a kid of a criminal alien be entitled to all of the benefits of American citizens?<<
Why should a CRIMINAL ALIEN be entitled to all of the benefits of American citizens? Heck - the illegal invaders have more freebies than CITIZENS!
57
posted on
09/16/2007 7:33:53 PM PDT
by
yorkie
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
To: muawiyah
The United States, from its inception as a nation, clearly differentiated among citizens, slaves, indians and immigrants. True, and the citizens were citizens of the States, not 'US citizens'.
"The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress."
U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
59
posted on
09/16/2007 7:38:26 PM PDT
by
MamaTexan
(~ I am NOT over 40.....I'm $39.95 + shipping & handling ~)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
`(b) Definition- Acknowledging the right of birthright citizenship established by section 1 of the 14th amendment to the Constitution,"Every Person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons."
Senator Jacob Howard, co-author of the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, 1866.
60
posted on
09/16/2007 7:43:08 PM PDT
by
MamaTexan
(~ I am NOT over 40.....I'm $39.95 + shipping & handling ~)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson