Don’t understand why John Cox and Alan Keyes are there. Keyes will probably cut off Farah with his bloviating ROFLI don't understand why Ron Paul is there.
He doesn't represent conservative values.
Posted on 09/17/2007 3:30:35 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
Republican Presidential Candidate Debate #6 – Fort Lauderdale, Florida 09/17/07 - Official Discussion Thread
The debate will focus on issues of special concern to social and religious conservatives who brand themselves "values voters." The candidates will begin arriving here mid-afternoon, and the debate kicks off at 7:30 p.m. Eastern Time. It will be streamed live via the Internet at ValuesVoterDebate.com and the website for the American Family Association.
It is also reported to be telecast on Sky Angel's Angel One channel & Dish Network channel #262.
Moderated by Joseph Farah, editor of WorldNetDaily
Candidates participating
Anybody having luck with dial-up?
I’m getting just a few words at a time.
Maybe somebody will let me know the highlights once in awhile.
We need to hear from Alan Keyes more frequently.
Me too - and I don't even like football
“grow up”
right back atcha.
’ All of the candidates (on stage) are fine conservatives.’
fine conservatives, indeed.
since you’re both the triplet-name guys, i’ll respond to both at the same time.
have fun with keyes who disowned his daughter and called for reparations
have fun with ru paul the surrendermonkey goldbug shrimp-porker (bacon wrapped shrimp?)
have fun with hucksterbee the open borders dumbass
john cox.... maybe he can start a 3rd party bid with mike gravel.
have fun with sam the sham brownback - another open borders munchkin
hunter and tanc are both ok... but realistically neither has been able to show a ground game that will win a presidential campaign.
think about that one.
First question (each has a minute) is on institution of marriage
I like Alan Keyes but there are already a couple of great conservatives in the race and he only dillutes the vote further.
Marriage question:
Huckabee wants a constitutional amendment to confirm marriage as between a man and woman.
Tancredo too.
grow up
In this case hitting the bottom is not that far away.
I’ll exchange Alan Keyes for Ron Paul any day...
Ron Paul Compares U.S. Marines to “Mall Security”
http://www.patgray.com/content/blogcategory/9/32/
‘Why are you even on this thread? I know it’s your right. But why would you make the choice to come and irritate people you otherwise have so much in common with.’
so now you can speak for everyone on the thread.... they’re all irritated, and you know it. mmm hmm...
i have the feeling i caused a few chuckles.
i didn’t realize this was the 1 percenter version of the daily dose of koolaid bush-worship thread, where we must all be cox-lovers. paulsies, and supporters of fine conservatives like alan keyes and his now hallmark reparations issue.
Has anybody found the debate on a DirecTV channel?
Ru Paul eating shoe leather....
OK. Bye.
Ron Paul has been married 50 years. Congratulations.
Does not need to see a constitutional amendment to define marriage. Look up “marriage” in the dictionary (LOL)
Thanks for the ping, too funny the AFVA invited all the Dhimmis to have a values debate and they all declined..too funny
‘grow up’
that’s the best you can do, because my characterizations were all correct.
Tank is for it
Cox says marriage is about protecting children, says we need marriage amendment
Brownback says it was his amendment that got through sub committee and it lost on the floor.
Ron Paul ...I don't see a need for another Constitutional amendment. Fed marriage act covers it. Marriage is a church function, not a state function
Hunter agrees that it is a state law, but it accomidates the Judeo / Christian traditions of our country, which is a family. He is for amendment
Keys... says it is needed, mentioned gays and Mit refusing to answer on this issue.
Don’t understand why John Cox and Alan Keyes are there. Keyes will probably cut off Farah with his bloviating ROFLI don't understand why Ron Paul is there.
Duncan Hunter supports amendment.
Keyes goes after the phony homo marriages, decided arbitrarily by judges, slams Mitt Romney (yes!)
Go Keyes Go!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.