This is dissapointing, but not surprising. Now, if only liberal Californians would STAY in California.
I guess the good news is she’s going to take things (read rights) away from us BUT it’s for our own good. So we have that to look forward to.
Californicate is a lost state in every sense. I would not invest a cent there unless they split their electoral votes as proposed.
Will the Mexicans stop coming to the rest of the states if we just give them California? Oh, and the Californians would have to stay there, too.
Aah, California. Where no one EVER polls Republicans. We’re out here, but we never hear from the pollsters. Wonder why?
This should at least lay to rest the myth that a liberal Rudy would do substantially better than a Conservative Fred (and Fred is only getting warmed up) in a rodent-leaning state.
WOW, I’m so shocked. Kalifornia, for Clinton...who would believe it.
If you only look at San Franfreeco and Lost Angeles, they are correct. Those two cities, because of their population numbers control the state. If you took out those two cities, California would be overwhelmingly Republican.
What was the name of that conservative who won in California? Reagan?
Don’t see anything about Ron Paul in here.
i’d say 95% of my neighbors in my apartment building are tv-moron democraps.
they hate bush and the iraq war,
but probably none of them could find iraq on a map.
How is the drive going in CA to get the proposal on the ballot to give out Electoral Votes per Congressional District rather than winner-take-all?
Can anyone give us an update?
The very, remote possibility of that has the Dems crapping down both legs.
I see Rudy is working that magic hat trick he and other supporters claim can turn blue to red. A 1% difference in support. Wow. Sure is electable.
Sanity and morality are severely frowned upon here.
It’s a lonely place for a conservative. : (