Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney wins Michigan Republican Leadership Conference Straw Poll
The Hotline - National Journal ^ | 23 September 2007 | Press Release

Posted on 09/23/2007 7:53:18 AM PDT by Spiff

Mackinac Island, MI-
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE—September 23, 2007
CONTACT: Amy Walter (202) 280-0675

Gov Mitt Romney won the Michigan Republican Leadership Conference straw poll, receiving 39 % of the 979 votes cast.

Sen. John McCain came in second with 27%, followed by Rep. Ron Paul with 10.8%.

The straw poll, sponsored by the Hotline, was held this Friday and Saturday on Mackinac Island.

Frmr New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was close behind Paul, taking 10.62%. Frmr Sen. Fred Thompson took 7%. All five spoke before conference attendees this weekend, as did Rep. Duncan Hunter, who took 1% of the vote. Mike Huckabee and Sam Brownback were scheduled to appear, but cancelled on Friday.

The Michigan Republican party unofficially certified the straw poll results.

Only conference registrants who were Michigan residents were eligible to vote.

Final results are below:

S. Brownback 3 .31%
Rudy Giuliani 104 10.62%
M. Huckabee 25 2.55%
D. Hunter 12 1.23%
J. McCain 260 26.56%
R. Paul 106 10.83%
M. Romney 383 39.12%
T. Tancredo 0 0%
F. Thompson 70 7.15%
Uncomm 16 1.63%

###


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 2008; electionpresident; elections; fred; fredthompson; mi2008; michigan; mittromney; romney; strawpolls; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Spiff

Good news. Michigan is a critical state.


41 posted on 09/23/2007 1:30:51 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Catholic4Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Congrats Mitt! Keep pushing for change in the party—fiscal restraint, enforcing immigration laws, and ethical high standards— and you will start to win more people over.


42 posted on 09/23/2007 2:04:38 PM PDT by nowandlater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Another great speech from Romney, based on substance, vision, ideas, and ideals.

Competence on steroids? You betcha!

Mitt Romney has been out in front on almost every issue...I could barely keep up with him this week alone.

Go Mitt!


43 posted on 09/23/2007 2:58:50 PM PDT by IwaCornDogs (No one appreciates the very special genius of your conversation as the dog does.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IwaCornDogs
****Another great speech from Romney, based on substance, vision, ideas, and ideals.

Competence on steroids? You betcha!

Mitt Romney has been out in front on almost every issue...I could barely keep up with him this week alone.

Go Mitt!****

Romney’s speech was pretty good, but anyone can mouth platitudes or have a good speech writer. To me, Romney is a weather vane, changing directions depending on which way the wind is blowing. Of course the same thing could be said about almost all the other Republican and Democratic candidates, except Ron Paul. I ran for election once and, sad to say, I tailored my message depending on the group I was meeting with. Nothing against my core beliefs, but what they wanted to hear, as far as rationally possible.

44 posted on 09/23/2007 4:53:52 PM PDT by jmeagan (Our last chance to change the direction of the country -- Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Mitt bump!


45 posted on 09/23/2007 5:54:51 PM PDT by TheLion (How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Is the Republican Leadership Conference related to the Republican Leadership Council?

The Republican Leadership Council is the home of Christine Todd Whitman and the RINOs. I am on their mailing list. These types would have little room for guys like Huckabee, Brownback, Hunter, Tancredo or even Thompson.

Sample recent e-mailing:

Can you believe they did that??

Centrist Republicans are under attack once again – this time in Idaho, where social fundamentalists are attempting to purge people out of the party. They are doing so in order to attain greater “purity” within the Republican
Party.

A recent article in the Idaho Statesman http://www.idahostatesman.com/richert/story/124134.html explains that social fundamentalist activists have “given up even being subtle about it.”

If you or a friend is a Republican voter in Idaho, make sure to express your support for the big-tent philosophy. Purging people is never good for our party and these are the type of internal party squabbles that have diminished our party in the past – we must not let it happen again.

2007 Candidates

The Republican Leadership Council will soon be announcing our endorsed candidates for the 2007 elections! In 2006, despite a bad year for Republicans, 65 of the RLC’s candidates won their campaigns. We look forward to improving on that record this year.

If you know of a candidate who deserves our support, encourage them to apply. Additional information, as well as our candidate survey, can be found HERE.

Tell us what you think!

The Republican Leadership Council always strives to bring you the latest news and information important to centrist Republicans. For insightful reactions to today’s news and political campaigns, be sure to check out our BLOG and let us know what you think. If you would like to be a contributor to the blog, please email heather@republican-leadership.com.


46 posted on 09/23/2007 7:32:37 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ((Not a newbie, just wanted a new screen name))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
Is the Republican Leadership Conference related to the Republican Leadership Council?

No. Not at all.

47 posted on 09/23/2007 7:38:23 PM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Sure, Romney won, but just wait until Fred actually ANNOUNCES, then he’ll clean up.

Oh, wait, he did announce. Never mind.


48 posted on 09/23/2007 7:51:52 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

It could be that they listened to Romney’s speech, and believed that he meant it.

On most issues, Romney’s saying the right thing. A lot of conservatives have trouble believing him, but at least he’s saying mostly what we want to hear.


49 posted on 09/23/2007 7:53:55 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

Fred Thompson is not talking the talk that will keep the conservatives on his side. His comments on CFR, along with his comments about why he doesn’t go to church, could turn off both the social conservatives and the small-government conservatives.


50 posted on 09/23/2007 7:58:11 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT; Spiff
Spiff, thanks for making the lack of a connection clear.

Sure, Romney won, but just wait until Fred actually ANNOUNCES, then he’ll clean up.
Oh, wait, he did announce. Never mind.


Many of us who are willing to support Thompson over Romney, McCain or Giuliani are grown-ups about it.

We don't pretend that Thompson will win Massachusetts, New York, Utah, Arizona or even Michigan.

Thompson starts with a strong base in the south, and is quite competitive in Florida, which had been a Giuliani stronghold.

I believe that Thompson will have a plurality of delegates after duper Tuesday, but by no means a majority. The later primaries may wind up meaning more than people think. I would have to be up more on the delegate rules in various states and the selection of "super-delegates" to have a better grip on it.

Those players with national name-recognition and fund-raising will be able to outlast a poor showing in Iowa or New Hampshire if they can point to a place where they can win early. Romney has Michigan (home state/legacy name); Giuliani should play well in the northeast, where the few remaining conservatives don't always know the rest of the country isn't like the northeast; Thompson can take South Carolina. It will be easy to portray Iowa as "bought and paid for" by Romney, and New Hampshire can be portrayed as supporting the local, as Clinton successfully did when MA Sen Tsongas beat him in 1992. Thompson winning SC won't hurt the other candidates, so Florida will be the first big test between Thompson and Giuliani. If Giuliani can't take Florida, he's through. Romney has support in the NE and possible upside potential in California. He should also do well in Moromon heavy states (Utah, Nevada and Idaho). These will NOT translate in meaningful numbers in the south or much of the midwest, in my opinion.

Many of us willing-to-support Thompson types do not think he is Ronaldus II, or is even a true "movement" conservative. We ARE afraid of the character of the party being deformed by a Giuliani-type. Personally, I will put up with his personal defects as I believe as president he can actually use his communication skills to pass stuff a GWB couldn't get through. I think Thompson would be less than RWR, but better than either Bush, and miles ahead of Bob Dole. Given wat's on the menu, I can live with him. In the general, I can even be enthusiastic.
51 posted on 09/23/2007 8:15:28 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ((Not a newbie, just wanted a new screen name))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

If Thompson is our nominee, I’ll be with him. I had just hoped for more from him. Meanwhile, my preferred candidate, while not getting any more traction in national polls, does appear to be coming on in state-by-state polls and is saying and doing mostly the right things.


52 posted on 09/23/2007 8:35:51 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

“I don’t have to tell you that my Dad made a mark on Michigan. And he made a mark on me. And I guess that is at the heart of things; he’s a big part of why I’m running for President today. In 1957, when he was the President of America n Motors, he gave a speech in which he reported the following conversation:

“’My nine year old son’ – that would be me – ‘came home from school and said “Mom, we really build the best cars, don’t we?”’

“She said, ‘Why Mitt, of course we do. Why do you ask?’

“’Well, if we build the best cars, why is it that less than three percent of the people agree with us?’

“After my Dad heard of this conversation, he took me aside and said, ‘Look, Mitt, size doesn’t always indicate strength and popularity doesn’t always indicate truth, and sales volume doesn’t always indicate value.’

“And then he added: ‘Right always prevails.’


So Dad ran a company that made lousy cars, and pretended they were quality.

Son learned well: He has had liberal positions, and pretends he is a conservative.


53 posted on 09/24/2007 6:49:01 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson