Skip to comments.
In switch, NRA eyeing role in GOP primaries (Might endorse Fred!)
The Washington Times ^
| September 25, 2007
| Joseph Curl
Posted on 09/25/2007 2:13:46 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
To: jellybean; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; pitbully; granite; ...
41
posted on
09/25/2007 7:53:22 AM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This would be a huge lift for Fred`s campaign. The NRA realizes the seriousness of this primary season and stopping a lying liberal from getting the GOP nomination is critical. Rooty's an anti-gun, gun grabbing authoritarian and can’t be trusted.
Go Fred go!
42
posted on
09/25/2007 7:53:43 AM PDT
by
Reagan Man
(FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
To: taxed2death
Who are you to call someone stupid? You are afraid of a think tank which has Angelina Jolie as a member.
43
posted on
09/25/2007 8:01:40 AM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"You don't support the Second Amendment; you LIVE the Second Amendment" Good move, NRA.
44
posted on
09/25/2007 8:06:24 AM PDT
by
b9
("Fred... doesn't suffer fools and he has the guts and the microphone to say what I think" ~ Samwise)
To: AlaskaErik
45
posted on
09/25/2007 8:06:47 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Reagan Man
This would be seismic.
I wonder how the MSM will spin this.
FNC is 100% predictable. They will take a yankees lose approach. “Guiliani lost the radical NRA endorsement today. it went to somebody else we can’t name.”
NYC Effete Elites will circle the waggons.
46
posted on
09/25/2007 8:10:16 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Ol' Sparky
He seems no more capable of winning the nomination than Alan Keyes. In December of 1999, Dr. Keyes was competing for last place with Orrin Hatch. Five weeks later, he had finished strongly in Iowa and earned one of the proverbial three tickets to New Hampshire.
This fight has barely begun. Not a single ballot will be cast for many months.
Conservatives need to stop listening to the gatekeepers in the Democrat Media and in the party and start listening very, very carefully to what the candidates are really saying.
If they can find the wisdom do that, they will discover that when it comes to real policy, and real principle, Alan Keyes stands head and shoulders above ANYONE in this race.
Alan Keyes - Jan Mickelson's show - WHO Radio in Des Moines, IA
47
posted on
09/25/2007 8:12:24 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
("The Pledge For America's Revival" - Alan Keyes 2008 - www.AlanKeyes.com)
To: Politicalmom
I’d be a lot less worried of this “think tank” if there were no politicians as members.
The NAU could almost work if Messico were excluded. Logic would dictate that having three “partners”, two having nearly the same standard of living and one being a corrupt cesspool will create untold problems.
48
posted on
09/25/2007 8:12:25 AM PDT
by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This could be very good news to those that feel Rudy is watering down the Republican party and forcing it away from its social conservative politics.
Let’s move NRA.
49
posted on
09/25/2007 8:13:43 AM PDT
by
commonguymd
(Move it to the right)
To: taxed2death
Wait.
You have the nerve to call ejonsie stupid, and you post ...
“The NAU could almost work if Messico were excluded”
Now, THAT’S stupid!
50
posted on
09/25/2007 10:33:55 AM PDT
by
papasmurf
(I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
To: rellimpank
ditto thatRon Paul has a little more chance as the nominee than I do Come on rellimpank, don't be so hard on yourself. If you think about it, you actually hve the same chance of being the nominee as Ron Paul!
51
posted on
09/25/2007 10:40:48 AM PDT
by
RayBob
(If guns kill people, can I blame misspelled words on my keyboard?)
To: papasmurf; ejonesie22
Merely pointing out the obvious... the extreme imbalance between Messico and her two northern neighbors.
Sorry if I offended you...but if another poster wants to call me “crazy”... at least they should ping me.
52
posted on
09/25/2007 10:43:04 AM PDT
by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: taxed2death
They have been debating this crap for years, especially after NAFTA. There will be bits that work and bits that don’t. The crap will go way and the stuff of benefit will stay in the long run. But it is not a North American Union in the vein of the EU. Not going to happen...
Quit being paranoid, we have real windmills to tilt at...
53
posted on
09/25/2007 10:50:25 AM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: papasmurf
Hey, in his defense I have called it Messico myself...
After a few too many shots of Tequila....
54
posted on
09/25/2007 10:52:48 AM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: ejonesie22
Ok, now, that was deeply funny!
Man, sometimes I cruise through just lookin’ for your wisea$$ posts, makes my day. LOL
55
posted on
09/25/2007 10:56:55 AM PDT
by
papasmurf
(I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
To: taxed2death; papasmurf
I was referring to crazy in a broad sense, as in people who fear the CFR.
Fear of MEXICO being brought into some form of union with the US outside of trade and a bit of security cooperation (which would be a good thing for a number of reasons IMHO)is at this time over the top. There will be no EU style arrangement on this Continent. There is no advantage to it for all the players. The EU succeeded because every country there basically sucked, so it "helped" everyone.
56
posted on
09/25/2007 11:00:50 AM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: papasmurf
57
posted on
09/25/2007 11:03:42 AM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: ejonesie22
You think the EU is a success?
At what?
58
posted on
09/25/2007 11:05:49 AM PDT
by
papasmurf
(I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
To: ejonesie22; taxed2death
Sorry, I was laughing too hard and hit the wrong poster name...(thinking of the sign over my commode)
taxed2death You think the EU is a success?
At what?
59
posted on
09/25/2007 11:08:25 AM PDT
by
papasmurf
(I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
To: absolootezer0
Fred said it was an absolute individual right... did Hunter call it a Super Duper individual right? Fred is 100% second amendment. Hunter is also.
LLS
60
posted on
09/25/2007 11:11:15 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson