Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

300 at CSU urge firing of editor over anti-Bush profanity
Daily Camera, via Drudge ^ | September 25, 2007 | Bill Scanlon

Posted on 09/25/2007 7:04:40 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner

FORT COLLINS — The student newspaper that stirred up a hornet's nest when it dropped the F-bomb last week drew more fire Monday.

(snip)

College Republicans at Colorado State University collected more than 300 signatures calling on CSU's Board of Student Communications to fire Editor in Chief David McSwane.

(snip)

Asked by CNN if the editorial could be characterized as vulgar or sophomoric, McSwane said he "wouldn't entirely disagree."

"We wanted people to understand that free speech is something we should talk about," he told CNN. "We felt that this campus, for one reason or another, has been really apathetic. Too quiet. We felt that the best way to spark that dialogue was to exercise it ourselves."

McSwane will get a chance to defend himself again Wednesday evening before CSU's Board of Student Communications.

His staff wasn't entirely supportive Monday. Thomas Andrews, a senior music performance major, said he was laid off from The Collegian on Monday because the newspaper had lost about $30,000 of advertising revenues from businesses that didn't like the editorial.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycamera.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: bush; collegerepublicans; csu; fword; mcswane; profanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
$30,000 in lost advertising overnight? Ouch!
1 posted on 09/25/2007 7:04:43 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

We felt that this campus, for one reason or another, has been really apathetic. Too quiet. We felt that the best way to spark that dialogue was to exercise it ourselves.”


One of the reasons I went to CSU is because they typically DON’T feel the need to express every sophomoric thought that floats into their mind. Good grief, what ever happened to just going to school? If you want to be all politically active, just go to CU like everyone else.


2 posted on 09/25/2007 7:13:20 AM PDT by mad puppy (I'd rather live a day on my feet than a year on my knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"300 at CSU urge firing of editor over anti-Bush profanity

TONIGHT, WE DINE IN THE COPY ROOM!!!!


3 posted on 09/25/2007 7:15:17 AM PDT by RabidBartender (Al-Qaeda doesn't need an intelligence network. They have the U.S. media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Mr Mcswane created a a great object lesson for the CSU students of what is happening out in the real world.

1 Make mindless left wing insults against Bush.

2 Readers and Advertisers respond negatively.

3 Revenues and circulation shrink.

4 Liberals left to whine about free speech to a declining audience while they have to make do with less.

Pretty much the NYT model, isn’t it?


4 posted on 09/25/2007 7:16:34 AM PDT by Wil H (Turning $1000 into $100,000 through cattle futures requires the "willing suspension of disbelief")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Young leftist with skulls full of mush love to hide behind
“freedom of speech” in order to spew sophomoric vulgarities.
There is, however, freedom FROM obscenities and abusive behavior.
One can say that they hate Bush or hate Clinton, but they can’t run naked in the streets screaming F_ _ _ whoever.
The left, however, keeps pushing the envelope of civility
every day.
5 posted on 09/25/2007 7:26:41 AM PDT by AlexW (Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia. Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

I would have been more impressed with his demonstration of free speech if he had used a racial slur or said something against the politically correct college culture, but then that would have violated the campus’s policies against harassment and hate speech.

Free speech is great except for unapproved speech.


6 posted on 09/25/2007 7:40:29 AM PDT by NeilGus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"...the newspaper had lost about $30,000 of advertising revenues from businesses that didn't like the editorial."

Hmmmm. Sounds like they *&%^@# themselves instread of Bush.

7 posted on 09/25/2007 7:41:32 AM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

They forget that with rights come responsibility. You have the freedom of speech but others have the freedom to react. Did they learn nothing from the Dixie Chicks?


8 posted on 09/25/2007 7:48:17 AM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wil H
Pretty much the NYT model, isn’t it?

But look at it this way. There was no chance he could have gotten a major media job coming out of that school. Now he will probably have multiple offers from major media outlets.

9 posted on 09/25/2007 8:04:55 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
I must have missed something here:

First, a disruptive person is tased at a John Kerry gathering.

Second, these idiots direct an obscenity at Bush as if he was responsible for it.

ADD at work? BDS maybe?

10 posted on 09/25/2007 8:23:37 AM PDT by Kenton (All vices in moderation. I don't want to overdo any but I don't want to skip any either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy
You are absolutely correct. With freedom of speech also comes having to take responsibility for ones own words. That little part is frequently forgotten (again see Dixie Chicks).
11 posted on 09/25/2007 8:32:51 AM PDT by CastleMan95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy

Exactly, I loved my time at CSU because of the lack of political idiocy. Some Kerry relative came to speak there at one point during the 04 campaign, a few hundred showed up to listen, a few dozen to protest. That was about the most exciting political event I remember in my time there. Other than the professors in my department being really dejected the day after the election. There were only two of us grad students in the whole department who were conservative and we had a really hard time not making fun of the others where they could hear.


12 posted on 09/25/2007 8:39:35 AM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
The comments on the Daily Camera website, after this story, are an excellent read. "...the reason the editor should be fired is NOT because he said F* Bush!.... He should be fired because, as a journalism major and editor, his writing skills are equivalent to a fifth grader."
13 posted on 09/25/2007 8:46:36 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"We felt that this campus, for one reason or another, has been really apathetic. Too quiet. We felt that the best way to spark that dialogue was to exercise it ourselves."

The best way to spark debate would be to challenge the facile acceptance of any style of speech whatsoever with an irreverent essay denying that free speech is a good idea.

They could even start with this quotation from Kirkegaard: "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."

14 posted on 09/25/2007 11:24:02 AM PDT by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox
...from Kirkegaard: "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."

It is amazing but I have never come across that quote before. Thanks.

Good to bump into you on the internet highway again.

15 posted on 09/25/2007 11:39:34 AM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free...their passions forge their fetters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

There will be free speech for him. But no free speech for those who favor Bush. That’s the way it works!
Remember the kid who was tasered.


16 posted on 09/25/2007 11:45:21 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
Good to bump into you on the internet highway again.

Likewise!

17 posted on 09/25/2007 12:12:00 PM PDT by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Hate speech!


18 posted on 09/25/2007 12:18:06 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

What is it about President Bush that brings out the worst from people’s tongue and pen ?


19 posted on 09/25/2007 12:19:16 PM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Free Speech is speech without government interference, not speech without consequences from employers, advertisers, customers, neighbors or other citizens.

Neither the State of Colorado nor the United States of America has jailed, threatened to jail, sent armed (or unarmed) personal to harass, intimidate or threaten McSwane. He is still free to walk up and down any place of public access and tell his fellow citizens, audibly visually and/or with interpretive dance to F*** Bush – he doesn't’t even need to us asterisks. His right to free speech is intact.

What has happened is that the forum (a college student newspaper editorial) that he originally used, which was not his – that forum was given to him by others – may be taken away, because those others believe he misused that forum. Certain advertisers have pulled $30,000.00 worth of ads because they believe he misused the forum of editorship – this is their right to spend their money as they see fit. Other students have said (used their free speech) to say he should be removed. The collage is looking at the question of his misusing their forum.

This is a very real life lesson in the use of words. If you or I or anyone want to get a messages out, whatever said messages is, the only way to truly control that messages is to control the forum used to spread the message. Most people do NOT control their forums, so they have to take into account, when spreading their message, what the forum owners want the message to be. That is reality as opposed to fantasy. The sooner people understand the difference the sooner we as a country can get back to civil discourse between opposing points of view.

The other real life lesson is that if one wishes to put out an unpopular or controversial message – own you own forum. What you own can’t be taken away from you. However, if you are using other people’s forums you must take their views into account when spreading your message.

20 posted on 09/25/2007 4:04:37 PM PDT by Talking_Mouse (O Lord, destroy Islam by converting the Muslims to Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson