Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Verizon Rejects Text Messages From Abortion Rights Group
New York Times ^

Posted on 09/26/2007 4:55:11 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Sun

So you would boycott a cell phone company for letting a group send messages to people who signed up to receive those messages? I’m going to go out on a limb and say that there are plenty of messages sent over the Verizon network you do not approve of. Especially with the advent of media messages and sending video.

Will you boycott Verizon when they don’t allow pro-life groups to send messages either?

And free speech is also about allowing messages you do not approve of to be sent. In fact that is the primary purpose of free speech.


41 posted on 09/27/2007 11:05:17 AM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde

As I said before, Verizon is not a religion, nor are they perfect, but check out some of the other cell phone companies, and you will see how bad some of them are.


42 posted on 09/27/2007 11:11:27 AM PDT by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

I hate abortion but I don’t like this. Subscribers should be able to choose what messages they get on a text network. If this precedent stands you can bet it will be used on conservative groups too. So watch out!


43 posted on 09/27/2007 5:44:13 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde

Great post. Some folks just don’t get that this can be used on us too and infringes on free speech. Nor do they get that they won’t get the messages. But this site has a lot of nanny-state “Conservatives” so i’m not surprised.


44 posted on 09/27/2007 5:45:17 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
But I’m sure the U of M would never discriminate against people like David Horowitz and groups like the ROTC and LifeChoices. And I suppose if the fairness doctrine passes, NARAL will gladly broadcast pro-life messages, too, right?

Eff you Susie Q. No company has to pass your pro-murder messages.

45 posted on 09/27/2007 5:51:16 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

I see verizon caved within hours of this article


46 posted on 09/27/2007 6:15:29 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
I hate abortion but I don’t like this. Subscribers should be able to choose what messages they get on a text network. If this precedent stands you can bet it will be used on conservative groups too. So watch out!

They changed their minds and caved anyway.

47 posted on 09/27/2007 8:52:26 PM PDT by xjcsa (Hillary Clinton is nothing more than Karl Marx with huge calves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sun

So I guess now that Verizon is going to allow the pro-abort messages, you’re going to have to get rid of them?


48 posted on 09/28/2007 6:18:20 PM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad

“So I guess now that Verizon is going to allow the pro-abort messages, you’re going to have to get rid of them?”

I don’t have ANY cell phone.


49 posted on 09/28/2007 6:53:54 PM PDT by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad

BUT if I did, I would do my RESEARCH, and go with the least of the evils.


50 posted on 09/28/2007 6:55:07 PM PDT by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sun

“BUT if I did, I would do my RESEARCH, and go with the least of the evils.”

I did my research and went with the company that would actually work at my house. Their stance on allowing private text messages requested by the customer isn’t part of the equation.


51 posted on 09/29/2007 2:54:33 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad

If you don’t care about unborn children, why are you on this thread?

Why don’t you start your own “What works in MY house” thread?


52 posted on 09/29/2007 8:28:06 AM PDT by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Sun
What makes you think they will do that??

That's their policy.

53 posted on 09/29/2007 8:32:49 AM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Still looking to see what phone company you’ll go with now that Verizon is allowing pro abort texts.

Fact is those messages are going only to folks who request them. I can’t see what’s wrong with that.


54 posted on 09/29/2007 5:52:45 PM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Nancy Keenan, Naral’s president, said Verizon’s decision interfered with political speech and advocacy.

What spin is this? It is NARAL who is trying to force Verizon to comply with their way of doing business.

Sorry NARAL, you don't own Verizon, and Verizon just told you to shove off!

55 posted on 09/29/2007 6:15:06 PM PDT by pray4liberty (Watch and pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad

You ignored my comment. If you don’t care about unborn children, and all you care about is how well a cell phone works in YOUR home, why don’t you start a “All I care about is how a cell phone works in MY home” thread.

What are you doing in THIS obviously pro-life thread?

And do you drink, sir? You keep repeating your posts.

I have already told you that I don’t have a cell phone.


56 posted on 09/29/2007 7:25:12 PM PDT by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas
Verizon isn't blocking the text messages, only limited how one signs up for them.

If a carrier decides not to provide a short code for a certain organization, the org would be wise to set up a page on their site where you can subscribe to the msgs.

it’s a question of the right of a carrier to control the political content of messages I CHOOSE to receive.

57 posted on 09/29/2007 7:35:26 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy ("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: william clark
FYI, and others, if you start to reveive text mesaages such as the ones you mention, reply to them with the word STOP. That will usually unsubscribe you.

because I began to get unsolicited text messages, including being fraudulently signed up for a subscription to a joke-of-the-day service, all of which I would have been charged for.

58 posted on 09/29/2007 7:39:40 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy ("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson