Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Verizon Rejects Text Messages From Abortion Rights Group
New York Times ^

Posted on 09/26/2007 4:55:11 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
more bias............
1 posted on 09/26/2007 4:55:12 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I might have to change my cell phone to Verizon...


2 posted on 09/26/2007 5:04:44 PM PDT by xjcsa (Hillary Clinton is nothing more than Karl Marx with huge calves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What a load of crap. Verizon knows they will get a lot of cancellations if people start getting pro abortion text msgs on their phones.

>>>>“This is right at the heart of the problem,” said Susan Crawford, a visiting professor at the University of Michigan law school, referring to the treatment of text messages. “The fact that wireless companies can choose to discriminate is very troubling.”


3 posted on 09/26/2007 5:24:50 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

spcrawf@umich.edu


4 posted on 09/26/2007 5:26:44 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The issue here is a lot bigger than Abortion, it’s a question of the right of a carrier to control the political content of messages I CHOOSE to receive.


5 posted on 09/26/2007 6:07:46 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I am happy I have a verizon account for both my mobile and my PC Card!

Finally a major corporation does something right; (usually these days you only hear of bad things coming out of the corporate world..)>!


6 posted on 09/26/2007 6:14:49 PM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; MountainFlower

ping


7 posted on 09/26/2007 6:15:24 PM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas

“The issue here is a lot bigger than Abortion, it’s a question of the right of a carrier to control the political content of messages I CHOOSE to receive.”

Exactly. This is a bad, bad precedent, people. Think about it - is most of corporate America more likely to censor liberals or conservatives?

We might like the censorship here, but I can assure you, we won’t like it the next time...


8 posted on 09/26/2007 6:49:08 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas
The issue here is a lot bigger than Abortion, it’s a question of the right of a carrier to control the political content of messages I CHOOSE to receive.

FR bans people all the time. They're free to go elsewhere. Verizon's organization, verizon's rules.

9 posted on 09/26/2007 8:48:38 PM PDT by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

WOOOHOOOO — VERIZON! It is a start. I will call them (they are my carrier) and thank them for the start.


10 posted on 09/26/2007 10:37:56 PM PDT by MountainFlower (There but by the grace of God go I.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; Calpernia; cpforlife.org; Pinkbell; Salvation; Sun; MHGinTN; All
ping!

I understand the question about what will they choose to NOT allow access next time.... It is a business, where you pay for the services. Would you want to be bombarded by advertising messages? Let alone those that are against your values? Whether their motivation is right, or not....it is a move in the direction of the RIGHT. God has moved governments in the past to do His bidding....why not a cell phone company?

Another side of this coin....how many TEENS have cell phones? Would you want your teen bombarded by NARAL and PP advertisements in text messages? If they (NARAL, PP) were allowed to do that, how far would it go? Where would it stop? I prefer to see this as a VERY POSITIVE thing in the world of so many negatives.

May Verizon continue to make wise decisions that match my values!

11 posted on 09/26/2007 10:46:35 PM PDT by MountainFlower (There but by the grace of God go I.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas
"The issue here is a lot bigger than Abortion, it’s a question of the right of a carrier to control the political content of messages I CHOOSE to receive." ... Specious bullfeathers, sir! IF Verizon were the only carrier with cell phone access, you might, MIGHT have a point. But you are free to choose a different carrier if you don't like the terms and conditions of service. NOW, if we could just get the stupid government to realize cable offering should be similarly arranged, making competition among carriers so that we could reach the point where we can choose exactly which channels we want coming into our homes and eliminate those we don't want, we'd be getting somewhere!
12 posted on 09/26/2007 11:06:31 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support. Defend life support for others in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MountainFlower

The problem is that Verizon would also ban Pro Life text messages if such a group wanted to send them.


13 posted on 09/26/2007 11:19:35 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

“I might have to change my cell phone to Verizon...”

Let’s all do that!!


14 posted on 09/27/2007 7:07:36 AM PDT by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas

It’s theit network, not yours not NARAL’s.


15 posted on 09/27/2007 7:09:39 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Hillary 2008: "The willing suspension of disbelief")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MountainFlower

“WOOOHOOOO — VERIZON! It is a start. I will call them (they are my carrier) and thank them for the start.”

You realize, don’t you, that under this reasoning Verizon will also ban pro life text messages? Do you still think it’s good?


16 posted on 09/27/2007 7:10:04 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sun

“I might have to change my cell phone to Verizon...”

Let’s all do that!!”

Will you switch again when they ban pro life messages?


17 posted on 09/27/2007 7:10:59 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MountainFlower

“it is a move in the direction of the RIGHT.”

EXACTLY, and we should support Verizon to send a message to other businesses.


18 posted on 09/27/2007 7:11:11 AM PDT by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad

“Will you switch again when they ban pro life messages?”

What makes you think they will do that??

PLUS, some of the other cell phone companies support a left-wing agenda, but not Verizon.

Please do research on the company that you now have.

Thanks.


19 posted on 09/27/2007 7:14:13 AM PDT by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
What a load of crap. Verizon knows they will get a lot of cancellations if people start getting pro abortion text msgs on their phones.

I don't think that these are "unsolicited" messages. Users have to send a message to NARAL via text message to sign up for these messages from NARAL. Verizon is just not allowing NARAL to use Verizon's network for this purpose. I don't really see a problem with this.

20 posted on 09/27/2007 7:17:05 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the frequently disappointed but ever optimistic Mets fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson