Superior Court For The State Of California (Fraud Lawsuit Filed Against The Clintons

Hillcap.org ^ | 2/25/2004 | Staff

[Laissez-faire capitalist]

Peter F. Paul, Plaintiff, v. William Jefferson Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton For U.S. Senate Committee, INC., New York Senate 2000, David Rosen, Gary Smith, James Levin, and Aaron Tonken, Defendents.

Case No. BC 304174

First Amended Complaint for damages and restitution, among other relief, arising from:

1) Fraud and Deceit 2) Negligent Misrepresentation; 3) Unfair Business Practices 4) Unjust Enrichment 5) Civil Conspiracy; and Demand for Jury Trial

Assigned to: Hon. Aurelio N. Munoz Department 47

Plaintiff, Peter F. Paul, by counsel, complains and alleges as follows:

[Laissez-faire capitalist]

What say you?

[Unicorn]

BTTT

[FormerACLUmember]

Can anyone stop the Crooked Clintons? Hell, the democrats would do a lot better with John Edwards as their candidate.

[Rudder]

February of 2004-—and the result of this action was?

[ANGGAPO]

Bout time.

[Libloather]

Ping...

[Kevmo]

Any recent updates?

[festus]

This will end with a heart attack.

[eyedigress]

Probably in Fort Marcy Park.

[Calvin Locke]

Camille Paglia was on Drudge Sunday night, moaning that since she's a Dem, she'll support Clinton as their candidate, even though she prefers Edwards or at least Obama.

She lost her credibility as a rational thinker, imho, saying that.

[Blood of Tyrants]

The Hildebeast has lawyers who will drag this out for years and years just like Bill did with the Paula Jones.

[claymax]

Can anyone tell me why we as Republicans/Conservatives have that ridiculous rule in our party that states that a Congressman in the Republican Party must step down if their are indictments against him, even if found innocent? I understand we have a higher standards and more morals then the the other clowns, but for us to be effective, we must play the same game. I think we are losing on that front because we don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings or to be frowned upon the Demoncrats. I say to hell with this pity crap and start playing their game and take down these morons as they have taken down Tom Delay. This is crazy to fight this kind of political battle when the rules are made for us to lose in the first place. My Grandpa use to tell me “you don’t take a knife to a gunfight” and this kinda holds true in this philosophy

[abigailsmybaby]

I have goosebumps. I hope they’re justified.

[papasmurf]

Sweet!

[DoughtyOne]

Sould play out about right, with the timing and all.

[stylin19a]

DFU has been all over this.

see the timeline here

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1873379/posts

[doug from upland]

I guess some people have been asleep. It goes to trial soon. There were oral arguments two weeks ago, and we are waiting for the Appellate ruling as to whether Hillary comes back in as a defendant to join her husband. In any case, she is going to be under oath and this baby is going to trial during the campaign.

[doug from upland]

Waiting for the appellate ruling. We should know soon whether she is just a witness under oath or joins her husband as a defendant.

[doug from upland]

For those who have paid attention, you know that a trial date for defendant Bill had already been set for March 27 of this year. Peter delayed that by taking it to the appellate court to try to bring back the beast as a defendant. This has already been dragged out. It is going to be tried during this campaign.