Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh is under attack. Your immediate action is needed
Brent Bozell Email ^ | 1 OCT 2007 | Brent Bozell

Posted on 10/01/2007 8:14:51 PM PDT by radar101

Media Research Center From the Desk of: Brent Bozell, Founder

++ Rush Limbaugh is under attack. Your immediate action is needed. See details.

To All;

The radical left activist group, Media Matters (funded by George Soros and others) has launched an all-out smear attack against Rush Limbaugh. And the liberal media are shamelessly promoting the assault.

Their goal? To force Rush off the air. Unless our MRC Action Team takes a stand right now, they could actually succeed.

Here is what is happening:

Media Matters is claiming that Rush called any soldier that opposes the war a "phony soldier." In fact, Rush was referencing an anti-war activist who falselyand despicably passed himself off as an Army Ranger and Purple Heart winner.

Rush was calling the phony soldier a "phony soldier"!

MSNBC willfully echoed the liberal attack campaign against Rush -- despite the obvious spin and deception by Media Matters. CBS's online "Public Eye" then joined in. And now, liberals in Congress are trying to get Rush removed from Clear Channel radio.

+ + Urgent Action Items

Action #1 -- Demand Clear Channel Radio "Keep Rush"

XXXX, Our contacts tell us liberal groups are flooding Clear Channel with demands to get Rush removed.

Go here to Email or Call Clear Channel to support Rush: (Note: after you send your letter, click here)

http://www.MRCaction.org/r.asp?u=2246&rid=11790865

Action #2 -- Flood Congress with calls today.

Liberal Senators are moving a resolution forward to publicly denounce Rush. We are urging all members of the MRC Action Team to contact your Congressman and Senators telling them you are offended by this action and urge them to oppose any legislative measure attacking Rush.

Sen. Schumer: 202-224-6542 Sen. Clinton: 202-224-4451

Congressional Switchboard: 202-224-3121

XXXX, I want to be able to report to the media how our MRC Action Team is responding to this attack. Once you take action on either or both of these items, simply click here and our system will automatically log that you have taken action:

http://www.MRCaction.org/r.asp?u=2242&rid=11790865

This is nothing more than an all-out effort to silence Rush and liberals will not stop until he is removed from the airwaves.

Thank you for taking action with me.

L. Brent Bozell, Founder Media Research Center

Clear Channel 200 East Basse Road San Antonio, TX 78209 Phone 1-210-822-2828

Communications / Media Relations: Lisa Dollinger 1-210-822-2828 lisacdollinger@clearchannel.com

Radio Sanda Coyle Phone: 1-210-822-2828 Email: sandacoyle@clearchannel.com

To: lisacdollinger@clearchannel.com

SAMPLE EMAIL TO CLEAR CHANNEL

E-mailed on Oct. 1, 2007

RE: Keep Rush Limbaugh

Dear Ms. Dollinger,

Recent news has it that Clear Channel Media is contemplating taking Rush Limbaugh off the air because of a bogus accusation trumped up by the leftwing organization Media Matters. Media do matter Ms. Dollinger, and that is why it would be unconscionable and no doubt economically foolish for Clear Channel to take Mr. Limbaugh’s excellent voice and message off the air.

I can sympathize with Democrat liberals who have found it difficult to get their message out via the airwaves, which is why they’re so intent on manufacturing grievances against the likes of Don Imus, Bill O’Reilly, and now Rush Limbaugh.

But Clear Channel should not bow to their impotence. If your channel really stands for free speech, it is important that you keep the debate going and keep Rush Limbaugh broadcasting for all the world to hear.

Sincerely yours,

X X


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clearchannel; cultureofcorruption; democratparty; democratscandals; fundedbysoros; handwringers; harryreid; jessemacbeth; mediamatters; partisanwitchhunt; reid; rushbashing; rushlimbaugh; soros; stalinisttactics; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: radar101

I’ve been busy e-mailing reps and Senators that are supporting this slander of Rush. I have asked them where their outrage was when Durbin, Harry, Murtha, etc. slandered our troops.


21 posted on 10/01/2007 8:37:06 PM PDT by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Low life Harry’s voicemail box is still full.

I emailed Clear Channel to voice my support for Rush.


22 posted on 10/01/2007 8:37:26 PM PDT by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GlennBeck08

Harry Reid is either playing dumb or really is dumb.

Jesee Macbeth and other PHONY SOLDIERS did not serve. They did not see combat. But they lied about such experiences.

Harry has said that Rush is insulting the men and women who serve in uniform but disagree with the war. Men like Jesse Macbeth NEVER SERVED and do not wear the uniform.

So which is it Harry, are you deliberately lying about who Rush was referring to or are you just mimicking MoveOn.PAC’s talking points?

Either way you are FAR more of a fraud and dangerous congressman tha Joseph McCarthy was.


23 posted on 10/01/2007 8:37:54 PM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Rush is fine. And with MacBeth getting smoked in Federal Court harry reid is going to be made to look like the Jack Ass that he is.


24 posted on 10/01/2007 8:38:05 PM PDT by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

I don’t think Rush is in any danger of getting taken off the air.


25 posted on 10/01/2007 8:38:36 PM PDT by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

These idiots. They simply make crap up and the Main Scream Media are willing accomplices. These people are eaten up with hate and their liberal asshole attitudes.


26 posted on 10/01/2007 8:39:02 PM PDT by shankbear (Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Time to now fill his email box. I have contributed.


27 posted on 10/01/2007 8:39:34 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Don’t forget the grievances against Michael Savage, Rush Limbaugh x 3 (he got canned from football, investigated at the airport for Viagra, shaken down in Florida by a partisan hack...), Bill Bennett, and Bill O’Reilly...

There is a concerted effort to take down anyone who speaks from the wrong side of the political aisle.


28 posted on 10/01/2007 8:41:20 PM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
I watched Ried on the floor today, and I was thinking to my self .. “Am I in the twilight zone?” Every thing that worm said was a bold faced lie. This whole thing is just unreal.
29 posted on 10/01/2007 8:41:31 PM PDT by chaos_5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: radar101

I don’t think Clear Channel would be so stupid as to kill their goose who lays the golden EIB eggs, but if they were, their value would tank almost immediately. Then Rush could buy up the whole company and put himself back on the air. :o)


30 posted on 10/01/2007 8:44:13 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (You Know Who knew there was poo on her Hsu but she wore it with a smile anyhoo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Clear Channel will never let him go, for a number of reasons:

1. He is too BIG a money maker for the company. And face it - money talks louder than any whining senator or congresscritter.

2. What ever happened to “free speech?” This is all about that, right? (all PC crap aside) If a company as large as Clear Channel knuckles under, what kind of example would that set ofr other media outlets?

3. Most broadcast news oriented companies love these kinds of controversies - gets them ratings.

I’ve been in the broadcast industry a long time and my estimation is that Rush will not be let go, no matter how much the liberal crybabies lie and cry. Just won’t happen, so don’t worry. Rush did nothing wrong or illegal to warrant his dismissal.

(PS - CBS let Imus go because they are SO in bed with the libs, it’s not funny. Likewise NBC. But I think he will come back as well).

- Pete


31 posted on 10/01/2007 8:45:21 PM PDT by peteram (Liberals are just Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peteram

ofr = for


32 posted on 10/01/2007 8:46:18 PM PDT by peteram (Liberals are just Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Harry Reid is a jack ass. Imagine the overzealous, flamingly liberal staffers any Democratic Congressman or woman has... need more be said. “It’s not the way the message is brought forth, it’s the message, maaaan!”


33 posted on 10/01/2007 8:46:37 PM PDT by GlennBeck08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

I just scanned an article here on FR where the hildabeast is involved with Media Matters.


34 posted on 10/01/2007 8:49:12 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Excellent observation.


35 posted on 10/01/2007 8:49:52 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vox humana

Go to senate.gov and look up old Harry and send him a good one. Don’t forget to also do Harkin, and for sure tell your Senator to support Rush. Cover the House too.


36 posted on 10/01/2007 8:50:55 PM PDT by mojo114
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: peteram
2. What ever happened to “free speech?”

"nappy headed hoes" thats what happened to it.

37 posted on 10/01/2007 8:51:28 PM PDT by chaos_5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Another excellent observation.


38 posted on 10/01/2007 8:51:34 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Another excellent observation.


39 posted on 10/01/2007 8:51:42 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: radar101

LOL. I can’t help but laugh. Rush is going nowhere. People need to calm down.


40 posted on 10/01/2007 8:52:57 PM PDT by Imgr8t
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson