Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Parmenio
Not loooking good for the Russians if this bit is true and not dissembling to cover an F-117 strike:

With prior approval from Washington, Israeli F151 jets were scrambled and, minutes later, the installation and its newly arrived contents were destroyed.

So secret were the operational details of the mission that even the pilots who were assigned to provide air cover for the strike jets had not been briefed on it until they were airborne. In the event, they were not needed: built-in stealth technology and electronic warfare systems were sophisticated enough to ‘blind’ Syria’s Russian-made anti-aircraft systems.

F-15I's don't HAVE stealth capability. Which, if it really was an F-15I strike, is really bad news for anyone stupid enough to buy an SA-23 system from the Russians.

6 posted on 10/04/2007 9:45:54 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

Really. The F-15 is about as stealthy as Mothra


15 posted on 10/04/2007 9:56:19 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr
F-15I's don't HAVE stealth capability.

There is passive stealth and active stealth. They aren't passively stealth. Now radars can only see what they are programed to see. If the actual return is masked be an overpowering false return which does not meet the threshold criteria, the radar may show nothing. The radar operator wouldn't even know its happening.

26 posted on 10/04/2007 10:00:29 AM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr

An all-important comma here: “In the event, they were not needed...”

I read this as the fighter planes were there to take out any attempt to shoot down the missle(s)? that delivered the actual strike.

I paused a long time at this particular phrasing and wished the author had elucidated his point.


59 posted on 10/04/2007 10:34:26 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr
F-15I's don't HAVE stealth capability. Which, if it really was an F-15I strike, is really bad news for anyone stupid enough to buy an SA-23 system from the Russians.

And if it wasn't and F-15I strike, that's also an interesting detail...

74 posted on 10/04/2007 10:50:38 AM PDT by null and void (<---- Living a life of quiet desperation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr

F117’s and B-2’s have stealth capability, but only the US has them.

Speculation can lead to madness, but could the Israeli’s be providing cover for a covert US mission?

Or maybe a joint mission, Israeli commandos supported by US airpower?

It’s probably not, but who can say, except those who know? And those who know can’t say.


96 posted on 10/04/2007 11:05:32 AM PDT by biggerten (Love you, Mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr
"F-15I's don't HAVE stealth capability."

But there are other ways of blinding the enemy to aircraft positions.
241 posted on 10/04/2007 1:32:54 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr
1. The Israeli's do not need us for this type of mission.

2. No US aircraft were directly involved.

3. F-117's are on the road to the scrap bin. Most have already been retired.

4. Russian stuff is CR$P.

5. We wouldn't have touched that mission directly on a bet.

246 posted on 10/04/2007 1:42:53 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (in the halls of Valhalla...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson