Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Fred Thompson Video on Gay Marriage: "So Be It"
CBNnews.com ^ | October 4, 2007 | David Brody

Posted on 10/04/2007 12:49:47 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah

The Brody File is working around the clock and this time has found video of Fred Thompson talking this week to the Des Moines Register editorial board. He’s explaining his view of a federal marriage amendment. This video has not been out there before. It is now, courtesy of The Brody File. Watch it here.

Part of the transcription reads:

“A judge couldn’t impose this (gay marriage) state or federal unless they had the acquiescence or unless the state legislature moved on its own to put it into law. If a state chose to recognize it (gay marriage) and the Governor signed off and signed it into legislation so be it. My opinion would be that that would be a very bad thing and a very surprising thing.”

His position here is not new. But the words “so be it” may be just a tad bit flip for social conservatives. The marriage issue could very well be a problem for Fred Thompson with many Evangelical voters. I know that his view is not well received with certain Evangelical groups. Comments like "so be it" don't help.

You see, let me try and explain what’s going on here. The millions of religious conservatives who are adamantly for a strict federal marriage amendment believe that marriage IS a one size fits all approach. Thompson is trying the federalism track here but here’s where he gets into trouble. Let’s take slavery for example. Hypothetically, if a state legislature approves slavery and a Governor signs it into law, then “so be it”? Of course not.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antifredhitpiece; axisofdesperation; elections; fma; fred; fredthompson; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; ia2008; pushlimbaughunderbus; romney; romneyhitsquad; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261 next last
To: dirtboy
"You are TRULY absurd with that comment."

Take it up with the Creator of the Universe.

221 posted on 10/05/2007 8:00:43 AM PDT by trickyricky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

“accepted societal mores of the day.”

BS most people in the even 1800s knew the property argument was BS, ratioalization of convenience.


222 posted on 10/05/2007 8:06:14 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I do. No different than a mother paying a hit-man to kill her child.


223 posted on 10/05/2007 9:14:45 AM PDT by redtetrahedron ("Before I formed you in the womb I knew you" - Jer 1:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

In other words, we’re your main competition and you want us gone. Understandable. Censorious and cowardly, but understandable.


224 posted on 10/05/2007 9:29:18 AM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: trickyricky
Take it up with the Creator of the Universe.

I'd say the problem lies more in your interpretation of what He said.

225 posted on 10/05/2007 9:55:54 AM PDT by dirtboy (Ron Paul - shrimp pimp rock schlockster surrender crustacean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

It was fully replied to on the other thread and you either missed it or you are a liar like she is. I do not care which or why and will point it out every time you or anyone else try and name drop the worthless traitor sellout.

Cheers !


226 posted on 10/05/2007 10:31:24 AM PDT by RachelFaith (Doing NOTHING... about the illegals already here IS Amnesty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
Your reasoning is circular. The “people” actually retain no power as power without a means of enforcement is mute. It is power in name only as it only becomes realized when it’s transferred via conduit to the legislature.

If the people retain no power that would mean that the 10th amendment is meaningless and the state has has practically unlimited powers while intimating that the 9th amendment is equally meaningless. It would also mean that there is no purpose to state constitutions, lays ruin to the concept of limited powers, and boils down to us being subjects of the state, not the state being subject to the people. Retained powers of the people are commonly referred to as rights. Rights ceded to government become powers.
227 posted on 10/05/2007 10:34:56 AM PDT by Durus ("Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling; Canticle_of_Deborah; Spiff
He is also making a full fledged move to go after the Christian vote by smearing the other candidates (falsely as shown here.)

Explain how a freeper for Mitt is a smear when this is Youtube is in Fred's own word not a doctored tape like they do to Mitt to fit their agenda!

Fred made this Youtube in a way to try not of offend the SSM!

228 posted on 10/05/2007 10:41:28 AM PDT by restornu (No one is perfect but you can always strive to do the right thing! Press Forward Mitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
” The ABA has a section devoted to making model codes for legislators to make future laws. The ABA’s model code for domestic relations has a future marriage based on “sex partners” and childre ARE NOT PART OF MARRIAGE. Children are an accessory to “breeding pairs”. (sound familiar?)”

This frightens me.

229 posted on 10/05/2007 10:42:19 AM PDT by oiler (Reagan Republicans Unite!!!!! Draft Fred Thompson in 08')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: restornu

See post 33 along with my and JimRob’s responses and you’ll understand what we were talking about.


230 posted on 10/05/2007 10:47:15 AM PDT by mnehring ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Your candidate, and your shilling, attacks, and lies, are highly dishonorable and beneath the dignity of this website. The decision to excise the Rudybots, who were behaving in similar fashion, was justified, and so is your removal.


231 posted on 10/05/2007 10:59:33 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

please give the link for the #33 is not clear!


232 posted on 10/05/2007 11:05:09 AM PDT by restornu (No one is perfect but you can always strive to do the right thing! Press Forward Mitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: restornu

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1906640/posts?page=232#33


233 posted on 10/05/2007 11:06:05 AM PDT by mnehring ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

What was that suppose to be it took me right back where I started!


234 posted on 10/05/2007 11:33:18 AM PDT by restornu (No one is perfect but you can always strive to do the right thing! Press Forward Mitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Durus

It’s just a matter of semantics. The “people” retain the power to cede power but the people in and of themselves have no tangible power.

But don’t confuse rights with power as obviously people have many rights that they have conferred upon themselves though constitutions both federal and state.


235 posted on 10/05/2007 11:35:06 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

**The ONLY reason I can think he does not want to dump the unsupportable federalism argument is that he has some closet homosexuals somewhere on his staff **

Fred’s communications director, Robert Traynham, is openly homosexual.

http://www.race42008.com/index.php?s=Robert+Traynham


236 posted on 10/05/2007 11:39:04 AM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Catholic4Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: restornu

rest, it has become so bad that any news article or fact, even a quote by Fred, is considered to be an attack on Fred.

Sad.


237 posted on 10/05/2007 11:42:45 AM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Catholic4Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

So one guy that works for him is Gay and Fred is dumping the marriage idea.

Right.

It could be something about realistic and acihevable goals, but no matter, we’ll go with your unbiased ideas...


238 posted on 10/05/2007 12:07:03 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

I have no idea if the two are connected. Probably not. I simply posted a fact in response to another poster’s inquiry.

You guys are paranoid.


239 posted on 10/05/2007 12:08:27 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Catholic4Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Deb, you owe me a keyboard AND a monitor...

I am still laughing....


240 posted on 10/05/2007 12:09:08 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson