Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defendant owes $222,000 for illegal downloading
Salon and USA Today ^ | Oct 4, 2007 | ThePythonicCow

Posted on 10/04/2007 4:15:18 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow

A staff write for Salon, Farhad Manjoo, and USA Today (which I can post from) are reporting that a Duluth, Minnesota jury has ordered Jammie Thomas to pay record companies $220,000 for illegal downloading and sharing of copyrighted music.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 10/04/2007 4:15:20 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
Oops - USA Today - which I can can't post from
2 posted on 10/04/2007 4:16:22 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (The Greens steal in fear of pollution, The Reds in fear of greed; Fear arising from a lack of Faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
Now available as an AP article:

Record Companies Win Music Sharing Trial

By JOSHUA FREED – 1 hour ago

DULUTH, Minn. (AP) — The recording industry won a key fight Thursday against illegal music downloading when a federal jury found a Minnesota woman shared copyrighted music online and levied $220,000 in damages against her.

Record companies have filed some 26,000 lawsuits since 2003 over file-sharing, which has hurt sales because it allows people to get music for free instead of paying for recordings in stores.

This was the first such case to go to trial. Many other defendants have settled by paying the companies a few thousand dollars.

The jury ordered Jammie Thomas, 30, to pay the six record companies that sued her $9,250 for each of 24 songs they focused on in the case. They had alleged she shared 1,702 songs in all.

3 posted on 10/04/2007 4:22:27 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (The Greens steal in fear of pollution, The Reds in fear of greed; Fear arising from a lack of Faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow

More from the AP (later, updated story):

The companies accused Thomas, 30, of Brainerd, of offering the songs online through a Kazaa file-sharing account. She denied wrongdoing and testified that she didn’t have a Kazaa account.

During the three-day trial, the record companies presented evidence they said showed the copyrighted songs were offered by a Kazaa user under the name “tereastarr.”

Their witnesses, including officials from an Internet provider and a security firm, testified that the Internet address used by “tereastarr” belonged to Thomas.


4 posted on 10/04/2007 4:26:02 PM PDT by upchuck (Hildabeaste as Prez... unimaginable, devastating misery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow

This is insane!


5 posted on 10/04/2007 4:26:08 PM PDT by MrLee (Sha'alu Shalom Yerushalyim!! God bless Eretz Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
Jammie

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

6 posted on 10/04/2007 4:26:52 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

GUILTY!


7 posted on 10/04/2007 4:34:35 PM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow

What do you want to bet they never collect a dime and she goes right back to file sharing?


8 posted on 10/04/2007 4:35:58 PM PDT by antinomian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrLee
The more powerful our federal government is, the more it attracts the powerful, eager to write laws and win lawsuits, to increase their power, and keep the rest of us outlaws.

Combined with a general break down of community morality, and the utter corruption of our schools, universities and mainstream media by secular, Marxist, leftist lies and deceptions, this is leading to the decline of this great nation.

I fully favor enforcing just laws.

Not all laws and not all court proceedings, are just.

9 posted on 10/04/2007 4:36:51 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (The Greens steal in fear of pollution, The Reds in fear of greed; Fear arising from a lack of Faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow

220,000 people should donate her $1.00 and the rest of the population should cease to purchase any CDs whatsoever . Let the RIAA eat the damn discs .


10 posted on 10/04/2007 5:08:12 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk

just sayin...


11 posted on 10/04/2007 5:08:55 PM PDT by radiohead (Dissolution of the IRS as we know it - Fred Thompson. Stop...You had me at "dissolution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow

If she’s going to pay that much in fines she might as well sell the downloads and make something while she’s at it.


12 posted on 10/04/2007 5:19:23 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow

I read that her lawyers rested without calling any witnesses. Sounds like a bad plan.


13 posted on 10/04/2007 5:43:35 PM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

I guess everyone here who is on her side and against the RIAA thinks their favorite singers and songwriters should make music as a hobby and offer it free to anyone who hears it. Come to think of it, why should they charge for concerts? Why shouldn’t you get in free if you can figure out a way to tear a hole in the fence?

What do you get paid for? Can I have it free?


14 posted on 10/04/2007 6:25:39 PM PDT by SoCalRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent

I wonder if the fact that she is an American Indian gives her “rights” that will allow her to avoid the penalties?


15 posted on 10/04/2007 7:00:17 PM PDT by formerlytempaussie (Minnesota- National Mosquito Runway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent

What sort of defense witnesses would you call?


16 posted on 10/04/2007 7:20:17 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow

The copyright cartel likes this precedent — it’s been getting a lot of bad ones lately. OTOH, those bad ones are where the RIAA went after people they knew were innocent.

She traded in copyrighted material and got caught. Too bad.

My question is: Will the artists see a dime of any money the RIAA gets from her? I doubt they will, since they already get none of the money that people pay when they settle.


17 posted on 10/04/2007 7:31:12 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCalRight
I guess everyone here who is on her side and against the RIAA thinks their favorite singers and songwriters should make music as a hobby and offer it free to anyone who hears it. Come to think of it, why should they charge for concerts? Why shouldn’t you get in free if you can figure out a way to tear a hole in the fence? What do you get paid for? Can I have it free?

They will continue to make money exactly the same way most of them make money today - by selling tickets to live performances. Most bands who have albums make little or nothing from them. The records companies make it all and the album serves as the band's billboard.

The internet and technology will make music CD's and record companies obsolete soon. But professional musicians will still be around and making money.

18 posted on 10/04/2007 7:35:53 PM PDT by antinomian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
The companies accused Thomas, 30, of Brainerd, of offering the songs online through a Kazaa file-sharing account. She denied wrongdoing and testified that she didn’t have a Kazaa account.

Dummmy question: Is the RIAA also going after people for Limewire downloads? My tech savvy teenagers are swearing to me that it isn't; I'm skeptical.

19 posted on 10/04/2007 7:50:54 PM PDT by Castlebar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

I doubt the RIAA will share the $385.42 per song they’re getting. She should pay for her crime, but not for more than the crime is worth.


20 posted on 10/04/2007 7:51:28 PM PDT by skr (Car bombs and IEDs are the exclamation marks for the latest Democrats' talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson