Posted on 10/07/2007 1:19:40 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
Question: What’s harder to get rid of than a cold? Answer: The Republicans getting rid of Senator Larry Craig.
It’s a story with (wide stance) legs. And a new allegation:
The male escort responsible for the downfall of Christian evangelist leader Ted Haggard is now alleging that embattled Senator Larry Craig also came to see him.
While promoting his new book during a radio interview with KNWQ-AM in Palm Springs Wednesday night, Mike Jones hesitated from making the allegation on the air.
Management for the radio station says Jones told them he would reveal something about Idaho Senator Larry Craig on the “Bulldog Bill Feingold Show.”
While he hesitated doing so on the air, a NewsChannel 3 camera was rolling when he made the accusation during a commercial break.
Feingold asked whether the Senator had seen Jones in a hotel room.
Jones responded, “No, he came to see me.”
Jones then added, “His travel records to Denver have been documented. That’s what I wanted to say.”
NewsChannel 3 asked Senator Craig’s office to comment on the allegations that Craig came to Denver to see Jones, who calls himself a gay escort.
Craig’s office said in response, “Mike Jones’ allegations are completely false.”
An allegation that will prove to be true? Or an allegation made to capitalize on a big story? No matter what, it remains an allegation.
But the case of Craig and the GOP is starting to resemble the classic comedy movie, “What About Bob.”
In that film, a psychiatrist played by Richard Dreyfus can’t get rid of his patient, played by Murray. Each time he thinks it’s over and he’s gotten rid of him, he shows up. And as the patient gets stronger, the psychiatrist gets weaker.
In case you’ve been on Mars — or visiting the Minneapolis airport restroom where Craig was arrested which has become a big tourist attraction (are pay toilets in its future?) — Craig, who pleaded guilty to disorderly bathroom conduct, had first said he would resign. But then he changed his mind about resigning and said he would wait to see what happened in his effort to try to get his guilty plea withdrawn. The judge said no so now Craig changed his mind about resigning if he lost in court and says he’ll stick out it out for the remainder of his term.
“As I continued to work for Idaho over the past three weeks here in the Senate, I have seen that it is possible for me to work here effectively,” Craig said in a statement. “I will continue my effort to clear my name in the Senate Ethics Committee - something that is not possible if I am not serving in the Senate.”
…..”I believe the best thing for him to do is keep his word,” said Sen. John Ensign of Nevada, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
“It’s embarrassing for the Senate, it’s embarrassing for his party,” Ensign said.
Other GOP senators agreed. “He ought to keep his word,” said Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. And Sen. Norm Coleman of Minnesota said, “I thought the original decision was the right thing to do.”
(“Keeping his word”? Isn’t that asking Craig to do something politicians don’t do? )
The betting now is that GOPers will try to force Craig out via Senate Ethics Committee hearings, but that vote can’t lead to his expulsion — only censure – and there are no signs Craig intends to leave before he intends to leave.
Meanwhile, Craig’s decision to dig in his heels (versus tapping his foot three times which got him into trouble at the airport) has thrown the GOP in Idaho into a state of dismay:
“A lot of Republicans in Idaho think they need to sit down on a good shrink’s couch right now,” said Tracy Lotz, a vice-chairman of the state Republican Party until last year. “We’re in shock.”
Unaccustomed to political relevance, Idaho has endured more than a month of political parody - and that was before Craig provided new material by saying he would stay in office, after all.
Some profess a respect for Craig for showing an indigenous “moxie” in telling off the national Republicans who tried to force him out, and some insist he has done nothing wrong. Yet it is also clear from interviews with people across the state that Craig has lost considerable support as he attempts to finish out his term.
Many people say his repeated revision of his plans to serve and not serve has served only himself and has ruined his credibility.
“He’s using politics, and that’s not really what his roots are,” said Jim Warren, superintendent of the Midvale School District, where Craig, 62, attended a one-room schoolhouse until he was in the seventh grade. “People here really pride themselves on keeping their word.”
Right now the outlook is for Craig to remain with his name still in the headlines as the committee hearings unfold. Craig might also be expected to take some strong political stand or make some comments that help him be more known again as a Republican politician versus someone who hurriedly left a stall without flushing when a police credential was flashed at him.
One theory is that Craig and his associates believe he has nothing to lose if he stays. His state will surely vote for a Republican to succeed him, no matter whether it’s one who is appointed or one who follows him after his term. And, the theory goes, the jokes have run their course.
Perhaps, but the Larry Craig jokes still rage on the internet in sites such as THIS, THIS and THIS. There is even a site with the Top 10 Larry Craig Bathroom Pick Up Lines.
There's an obvious double-standard that's perpetuated by the complicit liberal media and it makes me want to vomit also.
Frank was censured by congress. Craig was not.
Craig is a selfish jerk for not resigning ASAP. He’s hurting his party, and any Republican/conservative causes he may once have supported.
It was actually just drunken boorishness. Years ago, Kennedy & Chris Dodd cornered a waitress in a restaurant and forcibly pinned her between themselves - aka the "sandwich" - with obvious sexual connotations.
I've no love lost for either of those two wastes of flesh, but that's not really a valid counterpoint to the level of misbehavior we're talking about here.
News flash: if you're "half" of our political coalition, we are the other "half." That's sort of a mathematical necessity. And I'm sure Giuliani supporters feel real welcome in your fold right now. But no, in your eyes, the only ones being "attacked" are you self-proclaimed martyrs in the Evangelical movement.
I'm telling you: you guys can write me off as a "troll" all you wish. You can believe me when I say I would have no problem voting, in a general election, for Brownback, Huckabee, Hunter, or Tancredo, or whomever, or not. In a perfect world, my choice would be Hunter. But I possess something you apparently don't: a survival instinct, so I'm not supporting sure fire losers in a primary.
You are sewing the seeds of your own demise in whining about double standards with these lurid stories instead of forcefully comdemning the people involved and insisting on a house cleaning.
They shouldn't. At this point, I could vote for any of the Republicans on the ballot EXCEPT Rudy. I
don't have a religious test - I consider both Mitt and Fred to be members of cults, but I'm supporting Fred in the primaries at this point, and would be willing to support Mitt if he turns out to be the nominee.
I'm not a single issue guy, either. I don't like CFR, but I'll tap McCain if he's on the ballot next November. Huckabee made a fool of himself on the outside smoking ban, so I don't back him in the primary, even though he is one of the strongest supporters of Christian views.
So perhaps it is you gun grabbing pro-abortionists that are narrow minded.
Christianity is most popular among people who desperately need it. It's like an addict needing a fix. People who aren't drug addicts don't have a longing for drugs-- they can see some coke on a table and just keep on walking by.
Won’t happen. I went into Barney Frank’s office 17 years ago and demanded his resignation after it came out his companion was running a male prostitution ring out of their home. Even led a massive rally on the U.S. Capitol steps, Supreme Court and DNC calling for him to step down.
We’re still waiting.
Uhh, I'm pro-life and pro-gun. That might screw up your narrative, but sorry. Facts are a b**tch.
So perhaps it is those of you who support gun grabbing pro-abortionists baby killers that are narrow minded.
That better?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.