Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times Poll: Evangelicals Agree with Dr. Dobson
CitizenLink.com ^ | 10-8-2007 | Jennifer Mesko

Posted on 10/08/2007 5:17:30 PM PDT by monomaniac

New York Times Poll: Evangelicals Agree with Dr. Dobson

by Jennifer Mesko, associate editor

Majority only will support a presidential candidate who shares their values.

A New York Times/CBS News poll shows white, evangelical Republicans agree with Dr. James Dobson.

Nearly 60 percent of those who plan to vote in the primaries said they could not support a candidate they didn't agree with on issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage. Eighty-six percent said presidential candidates should be judged on both their political record and their personal life.

Dr. Dobson has taken a beating in the media for promising to vote only for a candidate who shares his basic values, even if that means supporting a third-party candidate.

Last week, he wrote an op-ed piece for The New York Times to clarify his position: "Speaking personally, and not for the organization I represent, I firmly believe that the selection of a president should begin with a recommitment to traditional moral values and beliefs. Those include the sanctity of human life, the institution of marriage, and other inviolable pro-family principles. Only after that determination is made can the acceptability of a nominee be assessed."

Rick Scarborough, president of Vision America, a Texas-based group that has a network of 5,000 pastors willing to mobilize their churches to vote, said evangelicals are not bluffing.

“I am not going to cast a sacred vote granted to me by the blood of millions of God-fearing Americans who died on the fields of battle for freedom, for a candidate who says it’s OK to kill the unborn,” he told The Times. “I just can’t.”


WATCH DR. DOBSON ON TV
Dr. James Dobson will be a guest on Hannity & Colmes on the Fox News Channel tonight at 9 ET. The program re-airs at midnight ET. He will offer his views, as a private citizen, on the 2008 presidential election.

FOR MORE INFORMATION
Read Dr. Dobson's op-ed that ran in The New York Times last week.



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008; abortion; christianvote; dobson; duncanhunter; electionpresident; elections; evangelical; evangelicals; fred; fredthompson; hannity; hannityandcolmes; homosexualagenda; humanlife; killing; life; nyt; poll; prolife; religion; republicans; romney; rudy; samesexmarriage; thompson; unborn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-296 next last
To: monomaniac

Dobson plays a good game of poker. And most people are falling for his bluff. Even Freepers.

He’s not content getting a RINO as our primary winner. He wants a real conservative. Me too.


101 posted on 10/08/2007 7:15:50 PM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
I know it is on Hannity’s site, in the Friday archive of his show. He read the email to dobson on the air. dobson said the he did indeed write it but if it had been for public release he would not have used the words that he did... words that were harsh, untrue, degrading. demeaning and vicious... and he admitted that he has never met Fred! He attacked Fred in every way the msm has, ventured into personal attacks not worthy of carville, plus he said he was not a Christian. He also lied about his people calling Fred and apologizing about the email. Fred’s team had documented the call and content. dobson lied saying that they called Fred but there was no apology. Incredulous lie. This man is a vile liar and the truth is not in him. BTW, FRED has a 100% rating on Right to Life issues! He also said that if the States can't get it done that he would support a marriage amendment as a last resort. Not good enough for James the pious!

LLS

102 posted on 10/08/2007 7:16:14 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Finny, you’ve got it EXACTLY RIGHT!!!

I’m sick of the republican party because it stands for a little more fiscal responsibility than the dems. They will both spend us into oblivion and socialism. There is no longer a bridge to build between the two ideologies; conservatism vs. socialism so we should give up trying. At this point, it’s a pure power grab with 3 TRILLION at stake.

Geeeez, talk about missing the elephant in the room!!!


103 posted on 10/08/2007 7:17:00 PM PDT by mek1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
LOL, I don’t know that he is, I havent’ seen it, maybe it sounds that way because he is not slamming him? Or maybe he doesn’t think Huckabee has the #s, or maybe he likes RG as a person, or maybe he has a gut feeling?

I don’t know.

104 posted on 10/08/2007 7:17:39 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: gscc
I would say that you may not believe Guiliani, that is your right, but if you were a betting man I can give you a sure bet that whoever Rudy would select would be a heck of a lot better than what Hillary would.

You are 100% guaranteed that she would elect someone whos first loyalty would be to Planned Parenthood. But with Rudy you at least have a chance that he would keep his promise to select Judges like Roberts and Alito. You would also have more political influence on him (same goes for any of the Republican nominees), where you will never ever have a seat at Hillarys table.

What you are doing by helping her get elected is loosing any minute chance of a voice at the Oval Office.

105 posted on 10/08/2007 7:18:06 PM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

because Hucksterbee is for amnesty, a wuss on the War on Terror and a nany stater


106 posted on 10/08/2007 7:19:08 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: RedOhioan

Where has Dobson said that he speaks for “most conservative Christians”? Give me just one example. Not two. One.

You’re buying into the character assassination, my friend, and even promoting it.


107 posted on 10/08/2007 7:19:11 PM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark; All

I agree. I think Dobson is sadly mistaken on this one.

I am thoroughly disgusted with him at this point.


108 posted on 10/08/2007 7:19:19 PM PDT by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

“What I don’t understand is this: Dobson is against Guiliani, against Thompson, I’m assuming against Romney? Who is he for???? It seems he’s left himself no option but a third party candidate because he’s already dismissed the top tier as unsuitable.”

I am with you,it does seem that way. I listened to Mr.Dobson and he is against Thompson over the marriage issue? Fred does believe that marriage is defined as between a man and a woman. So because Fred does not think a Constitutional ammendment is necessary, Dobson would let Hillary win??? Someone please help me understand this.


109 posted on 10/08/2007 7:19:53 PM PDT by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

“He gave us some GREAT SCOTUS Justices...”

I can’t agree:

December 2, 2005; Posted: 3:16 p.m. EST (20:16 GMT)

(CNN) — Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito had a private meeting with the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Friday as he sought to reassure lawmakers that he would respect legal precedent on abortion rights and put his personal views aside.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/02/specter.alito/

Sept. 13, 2005
WASHINGTON — Supreme Court nominee John Roberts said Tuesday that the landmark 1973 ruling legalizing abortion was “settled as a precedent of the court” as he was immediately pressed to address the divisive issue on the second day of his confirmation hearings.
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/9/13/103353.shtml


110 posted on 10/08/2007 7:19:58 PM PDT by donna (Perhaps if republicans would adhere to the Bible’s first 10 Commandments they wouldn’t need an 11th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: gscc

“You have no idea how well known and respected Dobson is in the Evangelical community.”

And after his slime attack on Fred.....could care less.

Let him start his little “It’s all about me” party and I’ll be happy to rid the Republicans of this tumor.


111 posted on 10/08/2007 7:21:47 PM PDT by RedOhioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Thank you,as you just explained what I wanted to know.


112 posted on 10/08/2007 7:21:55 PM PDT by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Theo
Dobson plays a good game of poker and I would never listen to a gambler when casting my vote.
113 posted on 10/08/2007 7:22:04 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (Waiting for Samson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
do it now while we face several SCOTUS retirements. This is not bringing on Jimmy Carter, HRC will be there for two terms and will get the judges. That is not a "lesson" to the republican, it is damning the innocent.

Selfish fools are going to bring on the very thing the abhor to pass. Idiotic, pure and simple.

I agree with you. Yes, we should get the MOST conservative candidate possible through the primary process. And then support the opponent of Hillary, and NOT through a coalition-splitting third party. That is a selfish act that WILL led to decades more of death.

I believe this is an example of evil triumphing because good men did nothing.

114 posted on 10/08/2007 7:23:15 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again. And Always Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I saw Dobson on Hannity’s show tonight. He made alot of sense and I agreed with him. Sean is so busy pushing Rudy when he should be pushing a true conservative. Ann Coulter agreed with Dobsen too. Dobsen made some excellent points. Ann suggested that we push for a true conservative to win the primary and stop promoting the so-called top 3. However, I would never vote 3rd party because Hillary is just evil. We just need the right man(conservative) to win the primary and he will win the election.


115 posted on 10/08/2007 7:23:15 PM PDT by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

The Masada wing of the GOP.


116 posted on 10/08/2007 7:24:07 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Democrat Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Wow! Choir finally agrees with Preacher!


117 posted on 10/08/2007 7:24:13 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedOhioan
There was and is only one Billy Graham... friend to all Presidents... walking amongst the enemy as Christ did. Even ‘toon had to moderate when Billy was on deck. The rest are all wannabes and worse. Swaggert... the other TV Evangelist that had a gay scandal... and Oral Roberts son going off all Capone... seems satan finds many of them an easy mark... kinda like a few of our Senators. At least we have “some” good ones... evilcrats have none at all.

LLS

118 posted on 10/08/2007 7:25:14 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

I agree. And very importantly, what will the effect of a Hillary (God forbid) presidency have on our volunteer armed forces?

How many will choose to re-up under her Heinous? Hello, draft.


119 posted on 10/08/2007 7:25:30 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again. And Always Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: bootless

Oops. Forgot to un-ital that last line - that was my response.


120 posted on 10/08/2007 7:26:10 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again. And Always Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson