Posted on 10/10/2007 10:46:42 AM PDT by Man50D
Edited on 10/12/2007 5:33:39 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Or be a dope and
double post
double post
double post
LOL!
more baseless acccusations bordering on smears. You know nothing of me, yet you accuse me of being in bed with special interests? Where's the Nazi accusation? That ought to be coming up next, eh? you're no better than the looney left attacking Rush and other people who are your betters.
WOW! this dude’s so PO’d at me that he has to emphasise his anger with a double post. Please, control yourself or you’ll likely go overboard.
youse guys sure have entertianing tactics....;-)
(actually I kinda LIKE this guy!)
YOU began with the paid shill crap. Not me. If you can’t take it don’t dish it out.
Excuse me? I believe you are making baseless accusations and smears. How do you guys get the nerve to accuse us of anything? See my tagline.
I simply asked a question, for which I have not received an answer. you responded not by answering the question, but by name calling and personal attacks. THEN you accused me of being a shill.
my question remains on the table unanswered. That means that I and everybody else can make whatever inferences about nto only the question, but by your refusal to make an honest reply.
The question of who's being paid to post here? No one. There, question answered. Dumb question by the way. In the vein of "when'd you stop beating your wife?"
my question remains on the table unanswered.
Because no one but me would pay it any mind.
I was not responding to a question I was responding to your smear tactics which were very overt no matter how innocent you now try to portray yourself.
The question of who's being paid to post here? No one. There, question answered.How could you possibly know that no one is being paid to post here?
Dumb question by the way. In the vein of "when'd you stop beating your wife?"I believe the AFFT has paid at least one person to post on her in the past so it's not such a dumb question.
Then you agree it's a dumb question?
I believe the AFFT has paid at least one person to post on her in the past so it's not such a dumb question.
Well, make up your mind. How could YOU possibly know that someone is being paid to post here? It is the anti's that have so much status quo to protect. The likelihood is much higher that paid posters are on that side.
Interesting corollary today the panel giving the “peace prize” to AlGore is of just the same caliber as the panel behind AFFT
How could you possibly know that no one is being paid to post here?
Then you agree it's a dumb question?
What? If I know that one person is paid to post here I could say "people are paid to post here." To say "no one" is paid to post here you would have to have certain knowledge of everyone who posts here. I really doubt it's possible for you to have that knowledge so you can't possibly say "no one" is paid to post here. Get it?
I believe the AFFT has paid at least one person to post on her in the past so it's not such a dumb question.
Well, make up your mind. How could YOU possibly know that someone is being paid to post here?
I believe Chief Negotiator's wife stated after he died that he was paid for his pro-FairTax activity on FR.
It is the anti's that have so much status quo to protect. The likelihood is much higher that paid posters are on that side.
And yet the AFFT is the only organization known to have paid people to post here. Funny, isn't it.
Since no one knows the answer we can only infer an answer. I infer that the SQL's have more to lose and therefore are more likely to have hired guns.
One of the most obnoxious questions ever on these threads. Only two people use it. Hmmm.
I infer that the SQL's have more to lose and therefore are more likely to have hired guns.Huh? Aren't their people who stand to gain under the FairTax (e.g., Linbeck, McNair, Trotter and their River Oaks Country Club crowd)? Aren't they willing to "hire guns" to achieve these gains? It appear they have in the past.
One of the most obnoxious questions ever on these threads.Given your tendency not to "get it," it's not obnoxious at all to ask if you "get it."
The country club crowd is least affected by the FT. It is those beholden to the income tax that stand to lose JOBS that are going to hire shills. The jobs such as those under the National Association of Underwriters. Get it? I think you'll find few FairTaxers who stand to lose their jobs IF the income tax remains. So simple logic would indicate that paid spinners are out in force against the FT. Get it?
Because of something you "heard" from Chief's wife? Sorry you can't say that and have anyone believe you. It also APPEARS that you and louie are reading from the same script. Get it? Get it? Get it? You both use that small minded stinger at the end of your diatribes as if you yourselves aren't convinced of your own arguments.
Let's see how well your scriptwriters dispel my notion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.