Skip to comments.
ABC Turns Presumption of Innocence Upside Down in Boot-Camp Case: 'Enough Evidence to Acquit?'
New York Times/NewsBusters ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 10/13/2007 6:08:37 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
To: governsleastgovernsbest
One of the guards involved with this is black, and he said they were doing as they were trained, and the "boy's" medical condition killed him. So how is this "racism"?
Also, the family got $5 million from the taxpayers of Florida even though they didn't deserve it. So can't they STFU now?
To: Crim
were all equal....cops are just a little more equal. But the refutation to your assertion is in your own post. The guards were charged with aggravated homicide, not negligent homicide. That is the difference. You used the "n" word in your post, being the conclusion you drew from watching the video (and likely not from all the testimony that the jurors heard). Would you say the video supported the "a" word? I doubt you could support that.
Now, perhaps the "more equal than others" racket came from the prosecution being purposefully overzealous in the charge and underzealous in presenting the case. I dunno but suspect the real smoking gun might be found there.
42
posted on
10/13/2007 11:18:50 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
OJ, Duke Students, Libby, Clinton, DeLay, Bill Frist, Terrorists.
It’s quite clear. Those the media deems the good guys are always innocent victims, those the media doesn’t like are guilty even after proven innocent.
43
posted on
10/13/2007 12:30:16 PM PDT
by
enough_idiocy
(www.daypo.net/test-iraq-war.html)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
This leaves an extremely bad tastes in my mouth, defending ABC....
But the State of Florida settled over 5 mil in taxpayer dollars worth of liability to the family prior to the resolution of specific criminal charges,indicating somebody on the government payroll was guilty of something, in this young boy’s death.
Why did the State essentially admit liability, if nobody did anything wrong?
Was it prosecutorial misconduct?
Did the guards get away with murder or merely negligent homicide? If they didn’t do anything wrong, why would the State of Florida accept liability for the child’s death?
This does not make any sense to me, as a parent.
The “government” accepts liability for the death of this child, but nobody in the employ of the government is actually ever identified as the person or persons guilty of causing the childs death?
The State closed the entire program down, prior to the trial of the individuals who were tried for the death of this child.
Why have the criminal trial at all, since the State of Florida had already assumed liability for the wrongfull death?
No, I don’t see that the child's parents can ever find any justice under the law, here.
Got a dead body,whose death was videotaped.
The State tries to pay the parents off, shuts down the entire boot camp program, but no individual(s) anywhere did anything wrong...it just...happened.
If it had been my child, I wouldn’t consider the “case” closed.
If it had been yours, would you?
44
posted on
10/14/2007 6:46:25 PM PDT
by
sarasmom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson