Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japanese Ship Hijacked In Africa
BBC ^ | 10-29-2007

Posted on 10/29/2007 8:16:36 AM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: According2RecentPollsAirIsGood

An informative website
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/pirates.htm


61 posted on 10/29/2007 2:59:50 PM PDT by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blam; null and void

WOOHOO! Go Navy! America’s finest! Thanks for the link, null and void.


62 posted on 10/29/2007 3:12:19 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar; blam; null and void
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1918044/posts
63 posted on 10/29/2007 3:15:05 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
Need something like a Harpoon. Not sure a Predator can carry that.

The pirate "ships" are mainly speedboats that they use to get boarding parties onto the ships. One 250-lbs JDAM would turn one into splinters

The Predator B (the new, larger version of the old Predator) can carry 3,000 pounds of ordinance, plus 3,000 pounds of fuel, giving it a loiter time of 32 hours at 50K feet altitude. I would guess you could put a pair of 1300 lbs harpoons on one and stay within the weight limits, but I'm thinking you would need to redesign the hardpoints on the wing

64 posted on 10/30/2007 6:17:40 AM PDT by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
True, true. But by the looks of it, I was a little prescient. See post 7. And then this was posted later.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1918044/posts

65 posted on 10/30/2007 6:27:16 AM PDT by Pistolshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Thanks for the detailed response. I am old enough to remember the tanker war in the Gulf where there was talk of fitting supertankers with chaff and other antimissile systems, but I recall it being rejected for much the same reasons you described. In a way, some of these concerns are similar to those that made the “classic” pirates successful, for economic reasons merchant ship crews were small in number compared to pirate crews and not well enough paid to have any incentive to fight off a pirate attack (and the pirates would kill everyone on board a ship that resisted). Better to surrender and take your chances.

Thanks again for the information

66 posted on 10/30/2007 7:14:49 AM PDT by Steelerfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Steelerfan

You’re welcome.


67 posted on 10/30/2007 9:49:46 AM PDT by Gritty (East of Athens, restraint is weakness; olive branches are cowardice, aid is a bribe-Ralph Peters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson