Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Great Media Pile-On ( Hillary Clinton )
Washington Post ^ | November 1, 2007 | Howard Kurtz

Posted on 11/1/2007, 10:27:25 PM by george76

Edited on 11/1/2007, 10:45:01 PM by Admin Moderator. [history]

Finally, what the media have been panting after, lusting after and devoutly wishing for: a crack in Hillary's armor!

A couple of stumbles in the Dems' seventh debate, and the journalistic sharks are circling. If not for that, all we'd have to work with is Dennis Kucinich's UFO sighting. Roughing up a presidential front-runner is so much more down to earth.

Hillary Clinton... botching of the Spitzer question was a clear mistake. The substance--whether she backs the New York governor's plan to give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants--is not insignificant.

But it was her utter inability to take a position that will launch a thousand stories on the media's most negative rap against HRC:

She's a triangulator. A trimmer. A carefully calculating pol who says what people want to hear. A canny candidate who is allergic to specifics.

That image could damage Clinton long after everyone has forgotten about her specific answer on MSNBC. Remember the Bush ad that showed John Kerry windsurfing left and right in a flip-flopping metaphor?

The Boston Globe...

"Hillary Clinton won't say how she will fix Social Security. She spurns a deadline for withdrawing troops from Iraq. She's for free trade, except when it doesn't work. She defends her home state's issuing of driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, but doesn't really like the idea."

Andrew Sullivan ...

"The obvious loser was Senator Clinton. Her constant calculation, careful parsing, avoidance of direct answers to direct questions: all these were reminders of a pure politician. She's obviously capable, extremely intelligent, and so hollow you could almost hear the focus-grouped platitudes echo within her.

She also lost that new-Clinton benign smile, that newly poll-tested glow. Instead we got an occasionally droning, lecturing, and unrelenting stream of tight-faced opportunism."


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2008; clinton; debates; demdebates; democratparty; elections; hillary; hillaryclinton; hillaryscandals; illegalimmigrants; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; polls; spitzer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:27:27 PM by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

ouchies...


2 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:30:32 PM by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
The Dims will go with her, their first instinct, no doubt about it.

Their goal is giving Bill his 3rd and 4th terms.

3 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:31:22 PM by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

” The substance—whether she backs the New York governor’s plan to give driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants—is not insignificant. “

Thats all Howie needed to write. If there was ever an issue important to New Yorkers and one where we should expect our senators to take a stand, this is it. No excuses.


4 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:35:59 PM by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Blood in the water..................


5 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:36:24 PM by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

She is revealing herself to be nothing more than...

...President Clinton’s wife.


6 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:37:33 PM by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Not to worry, the coronation of Queen Hillary as the Dem nominee will go ahead as scheduled.


7 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:38:35 PM by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76
 Pick Hillary

     2008

8 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:39:43 PM by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Her advisers obviously told her that if this question came up she should turn it around and Blame Bush for the lack of “comprehensive immigration reform.” Anybody with two brain cells knows that Bush wanted this bill. She used the word “administration.” Liar.


9 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:44:48 PM by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Finally, what the media have been panting after, lusting after and devoutly wishing for: a crack in Hillary's armor!

What a croc

She has enough corruption radicalism in her background to sink 10 candidates if the media was really serious about getting the facts
10 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:51:40 PM by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76


Peter Paul & Hillary
Greatest Hits!
11 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:53:20 PM by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Finally, what the media have been panting after, lusting after and devoutly wishing for: a crack in Hillary's armor!

The cracks have always been there, but the press has denied their existence, lacked any curiosity, or expended any time or effort to examine the cracks. Now that Hillary inserted her own foot in her own vicious mouth, the lazy giant is waking up.

12 posted on 11/1/2007, 10:58:40 PM by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

The Empress has no clothes.


13 posted on 11/1/2007, 11:04:57 PM by pacpam (action=consequence and applies in all cases - friend of victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: george76

And why should Hillary be exempt from media scrutiny? Or is it that ‘pile ons’ are designed only for Republicans?


14 posted on 11/1/2007, 11:05:00 PM by Magnolia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

She actually looks fairly attractive in pastel pink. Pastels are her best color palette. The severe black pantsuit, black eyebrows and russet red lipstick (like she wore in the debate) are not becoming at all. She must think she has to wear the dark colors to appear more serious.


15 posted on 11/1/2007, 11:08:16 PM by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pacpam
The Empress has no clothes.

EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!

16 posted on 11/1/2007, 11:12:20 PM by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: randita

She was trying to be a New Yorker with the black pantsuit.


17 posted on 11/1/2007, 11:17:59 PM by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: george76

All of these articles talk about how badly Clinton did, but I have yet to read one gushing about how well the other candidates did. In other words, it remains all about Clinton. The other candidates did little to distinguish themselves outside of attacking her, and I expect little to change in this race.


18 posted on 11/1/2007, 11:19:01 PM by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

The only Democrat that didn’t pile on her the other night was Bill. [Credit to the Tonight Show].


19 posted on 11/1/2007, 11:20:52 PM by Mr. Mojo (My other Telecaster is a Thinline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson