Posted on 11/06/2007 7:58:38 PM PST by doug from upland
Let us say it loudly for the entire world to hear us: We do not believe that violence against women is simply cultural; we believe it is simply criminal.
Bump!
Must read for later.
GIVE ME A FREAKIN' BREAK!
The "news media" are proven liars and dishonest cover-ups.
CLINTONS TOOK MONEY FROM TRAFFICKER OF WOMEN - http://youtube.com/watch?v=jx1JDiXtwsQ
THE BILL CLINTON SEXUAL PREDATOR SONG - http://youtube.com/watch?v=T_kia4Ig1QA
HEY, HILLARY....STOP THE SEXUAL PREDATOR - http://youtube.com/watch?v=qBTehvzkTe8
When I saw your name, I thought I was living through that nightmare all over again. Point by point. Confess that I couldn’t stomach those details again. I hope you mentioned that the Democrat Senators never looked at the report of Kenneth Starr. Correct me if I am wrong.
It’s possible Bill Clinton would not have been President if they had.
Thanks for posting what really happened.
But in his book, Schippers reveals a stunning new detail as he recounts Woznicki’s version of Broaddrick’s story.
“One evening, years before, in 1984 or 1985, Mr. and Mrs. Broaddrick had attended a function in Hot Springs, Arkansas. The couple didn’t realize that Clinton was the keynote speaker. When they found out, they returned to their hotel room.
“In the course of the evening, (Juanita’s husband) David went down to the bar and found himself standing next to Clinton. Clinton stuck out his hand and said, ‘You’re with Juanita, aren’t you?’
“Broaddrick squeezed Clinton’s hand as hard as he was able. He looked Clinton right in the eye and, continuing his grip, said, ‘Don’t you go near her or near her home; don’t you even so much as look at her.’
“Startled, Clinton pulled his hand away and said, ‘I didn’t know she was with you when that happened.’ “
When “that” happened? Clinton wasn’t mystified by Mr. Broaddrick’s angry demeanor and ominous-sounding words. He accepted the warning without protest and asked for no further explanation. His sanguine reception of Broaddrick’s hostile behavior has only one explanation.
Undoubtedly, Clinton knew exactly why Broaddrick was upset about “that.”
Certainly David Broaddrick had understood. Without explicitly saying so, the future president of the United States had just acknowledged he was a rapist.
No Dems went to the Ford Building. Even if they had, it would not have made a difference. The only thing that could have made a difference was if Trent Lott saw that Clinton’s victims testified before the Senate. Lott is a coward and didn’t do that. There was no chance to convict Clinton in the Senate with the American public being convinced he was a rapist. Public opinion might have changed things.
To this day I still can’t believe that Clinton got away with this and so many many other things.
I mean, intellectually I know it, but Dear God Above how in the world did he manage it?
DIRTEXPOTUS at large, still up to his same old game.
And now, here comes Hillary! If we can’t stop that.... woman (using the term loosely) this country is doomed.
It began with the bombing of the Murrah Building. Clinton used that to create the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy and “hate talk radio” and save his presidency. He galvanized support against the dreaded right wing. By defending anything he did, they were fighting the right wing. It was evil, but he pulled if off brilliantly.
I have my old video tape of the Dateline interview with Juanita, but is it available anywhere on the internet?
I’ve seen parts on the Net.
The techniques that were employed by David Copperfield to lure women (using subordinates to make contact, promises of future employment oppportunities, etc.) are predatory and are being exposed by the press as the sick conduct that they were. However, these were the same techniques used by Clinton decades earlier (Arkansas state troopers, Wiley’s job opportunities, denial when caught) and the press gave him a pass. Clinton and Copperfield are both predators, but why should one get a pass and not the other? Couldn’t following Clinton’s role model behavior be an excuse for the magician?
JUANITA’S GREETING TO THE FREEPERS - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1913935/posts
There has to be somewhere you can upload it. Get it out there. Ask around and see if any FReepers have ideas of other places to post it.
He gets away with things because the people want him to get away — it’s like when theatergoers secretly root for the “lovable rogue” to prevail. Plus a lot of American like the idea that the president is more immoral than they. So, it’s on to HRC in 2008 and 2012 — it’s fate.
Is Kathleen still for HRC because of her faith in “democracy”?
I don’t understand. When was Kathleen for HRC?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.