Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nat'l Right to Life to endorse Thompson
Politico ^ | Jonathan Martin

Posted on 11/12/2007 9:52:42 AM PST by jaybeegee

Fred Thompson will pick up the support of the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) tomorrow, according to two Republicans familar with the decision.

For a candidate who came up empty-handed last week when three prominent Christian conservatives endorsed GOP hopefuls and is falling in both national and early state polls, the move comes at a critical time.

NRLC is the most prominent anti-abortion group in the country, with affiliates in all 50 states and over 3,000 local chapters.

A spokesperson for the organization declined to comment on their endorsement decision, but Thompson was likely rewarded for his strong pro-life voting record in the Senate. As Thompson frequently touts on the stump, he rated out at 100% on the group's report card.

More...

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008endorsements; abortion; dehydrate; dehydration; elections; eugenics; euthanasia; fred; fredthompson; nrlc; prolifevote; starvation; starve; starvedehydrate; terrischiavo; thompson; tyranny; whiterose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 841-848 next last
To: mnehrling

This is HUGH!!!


61 posted on 11/12/2007 10:35:55 AM PST by malos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Squidpup

National Right to Life does a lot of good work but they have gotten so pragmatic in the last few years that they often times sell pro-lifers short. For example, they actually opposed the proposed South Dakota Law to ban abortion because they were afraid it would backfire. Similarily they are now (possibly) going to endorse Fred Thompson who is at best only moderately conservative on abortion. He opposes our pro-life platform which calls for a human life amendment and has made public statements - including two on his meet the press interview last week - which suggest that he is uncomfortable with even the states passing laws which would criminalize 1st trimester abortions.


62 posted on 11/12/2007 10:37:12 AM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
NRLC will endorse Thompson
63 posted on 11/12/2007 10:37:20 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
Oh come, you know better, every conservative group in the world could line up behind Hunter, he would still have little appeal beyond the deepest core, and that is no where near enough to win. He is a great guy, but too focused on too few key issues. This is a national office, you have to be broader than he is.

This is a race for the whitehouse, not who is the hardest core conservative. They chose very well.

64 posted on 11/12/2007 10:38:25 AM PST by ejonesie22 (Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Isn’t it going to be fun around here when Duncan Hunter withdraws and endorses Fred Thompson?


65 posted on 11/12/2007 10:38:30 AM PST by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country.... Valor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

I’m sure that a lot of things surprise people who have sold their soul to support Mitt Romney.

At NRLC, they, unlike your average MittWit, are able to discern between ratings that are tainted by a disagreement on CFR and actual pro-life votes.


66 posted on 11/12/2007 10:39:39 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

No, they realize that 1) The president has NO ROLE in the amendment process and 2) If pro-lifers do not get behind one “pro-life” candidate the following will happen: 1) Guiliani nominated, 2) Pro-lifers and conservatives stay home, 3) Hillary elected and 4) Roe will NOT be overturned for another generation.

Counter, your all or nothing strategy will be a disaster.


67 posted on 11/12/2007 10:40:49 AM PST by malos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

Fred may not be your first choice but he is a good choice. The NRTL has seen the same polls we have. Rudy is pulling away. Even the NRTL endorsement would not be enough to make up the support needed for Hunter, but this could go a long way toward making up the difference for Fred. Thompson is still within reach if more Conservatives get behind him.


68 posted on 11/12/2007 10:41:21 AM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - President Fred D. Thompson /"The Constitution means what is says.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

Actually, I think male voters are more likely to support legal abortion than females. The massive army of women ready to storm the polls to elect a “pro-choice” candidate is a media created myth. Women do vote more liberal than men, but it’s because they want socialist goodies and handouts, not because of abortion.

That having been said, you are right about this being a tactical battle.


69 posted on 11/12/2007 10:41:59 AM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Fox and MSNBC have confirmed it.

LLS


70 posted on 11/12/2007 10:42:09 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JFC

Smoking some goooood Inside the Beltway reefer huh.


71 posted on 11/12/2007 10:43:00 AM PST by malos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

Look two posts below yours.

LLS


72 posted on 11/12/2007 10:43:06 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

Fox Breaking News...

SOURCES TELL FOX NEWS THAT FRED THOMPSON WILL GET NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE ENDORSEMENT


73 posted on 11/12/2007 10:43:36 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jaybeegee

Go Fred Go!


74 posted on 11/12/2007 10:44:35 AM PST by HerrBlucher (He's the coolest thing around, gonna shut HRC down, gonna turn it on, wind it up, blow em out, FDT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

On to the NRA next! :)


75 posted on 11/12/2007 10:44:58 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Fred clarified that he is not opposed to the HLA on the Republican platform. Directly from Fred in a follow up to the Russert discussion:

At a campaign stop in South Carolina, Thompson indicated that he had given Russert's question more thought and sought to clarify his position. "I can run on the Republican Platform. ... I have a different priority in terms of how to achieve the same objective. I think Roe v. Wade should be changed with good judges following the law. … [E]ven when Republicans had control of the Senate, we could not move that (constitutional amendment) forward."

76 posted on 11/12/2007 10:45:47 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

DAMN!!

I was just getting ready to post that the NRA will likely be next!


77 posted on 11/12/2007 10:46:14 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

you cant reason with people that are unwilling to take off their blinders.


78 posted on 11/12/2007 10:47:02 AM PST by donnab (saving liberals brains....one moron at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Are they as much Thompson Hater’s as they are Rudy supporters? I can’t tell the difference!


79 posted on 11/12/2007 10:47:39 AM PST by Camel Joe (liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Route66
They believe Fred Thompson can be trusted to remain 100% pro life. I do, too.

Trust being the operative word....and Fred is THE trustworthy candidate, no doubt about that.

80 posted on 11/12/2007 10:48:31 AM PST by HerrBlucher (He's the coolest thing around, gonna shut HRC down, gonna turn it on, wind it up, blow em out, FDT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 841-848 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson