Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Saudi's running scared that their golden spigot is about to have competition?
1 posted on 11/14/2007 6:23:24 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Dane

Stable supply is more important than low price IMO. Besides, the cost of extracting the Alberta oil will go down as the extraction technology improves.

I was talking to a Canadian engineer who was in Tokyo trying to line up Japanese expertise and investors and he was getting a lot of attention from some powerful companies here.


2 posted on 11/14/2007 6:28:44 PM PST by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

If I knew my gasoline was derived from Canadian oil sands and not Saudi crude, I would gladly pay $3 a gallon at the pump.


3 posted on 11/14/2007 6:29:02 PM PST by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

OK Mr Suadi...then put them out of business by dropping the price of your oil to $30.00...otherwise STFU


4 posted on 11/14/2007 6:29:13 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
Ali Al-Naimi noted that the "sands of oil" in northern Alberta need prices to be at least $40 to $60 US a barrel...

We passed that up about $40 ago.

5 posted on 11/14/2007 6:29:23 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

what is OPEC actually selling for these days?


6 posted on 11/14/2007 6:29:38 PM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68 (CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

Maybe they realize that they have allowed the price to go too high?

I think they need to start bringing more oil to market quickly if they want to stifle the new kid on the block. Once the initial infrastructure to develop Alberta oil is in place, the cost to bring it to market in the US will be a lot less.


7 posted on 11/14/2007 6:30:09 PM PST by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

The product is there. The need is there. The technology to develop it will follow.


8 posted on 11/14/2007 6:30:43 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

A theory I have, is the US is intent on paying what seems to be expensive prices today, buying overseas, to save our own hemisphere stocks for later. Smart plan, and allows for a very large strategic oil reserve.

This is like me eating my sisters lunch first, then mine. The other way around, I always had to eat my food really fast, and I’d only get about half of hers.


9 posted on 11/14/2007 6:31:32 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

Saudi oil money comes back to us in car bombs and radical jihad. Canadian oil money comes back to us in vacationing Albertans and British Columbians getting medical treatment. Which should we prefer?


12 posted on 11/14/2007 6:35:53 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Government is the hired help - not the boss. When politicians forget that they must be fired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

When will the US get it’s head out of it’s ASS and drill locally? Screw imports!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


15 posted on 11/14/2007 6:40:42 PM PST by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

Just wait...the largest oil field/s in the ME will be in Iraq. The crude will be an extremely high grade. Sunni territory...saddamn wouldn’t open up this area...that’s why the Sunnis’ are against al qeada...exploration companies require no violence...


24 posted on 11/14/2007 6:46:20 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

Exact-o-mundo, my friend. They want us to be vulnerable to extortion. Oil independence is not in THEIR favor.


26 posted on 11/14/2007 6:47:36 PM PST by SatinDoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
suggesting Saudi Arabia is a better value for investors

Well, Saudi oil is certainly much, much cheaper, as long as it lasts. But what does he mean by saying that it is a better investment? The major US oil companies invested in Arabia, and the Arabs nationalized the operation.

So, how is it a better investment to put your money in a part of the world where terror is common, the locals are too lazy to do their own work, and any money you put in will be confiscated?

Sure, you can go and work for the Saudis, and get paid well because it's such an unpleasant place. But invest?

32 posted on 11/14/2007 6:52:10 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

Too expensive for WHOM? Not for them, they’re not buying. I think it is worth it and 20%, just to disengage from the sand-pounders.


34 posted on 11/14/2007 6:53:26 PM PST by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

Energy independence is one of the most important planks of any war on terror. We shouldn’t have to depend on what some Middle Eastern (or South American) (or Eastern) dictator says to be able to get ourselves to our jobs.


38 posted on 11/14/2007 6:55:37 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
Saudi, afraid of a little compititon?
39 posted on 11/14/2007 6:57:12 PM PST by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

no kidding. anyone with familiarity knows the arabs can put you out of business in the blink of a camel’s lash. thats why we have such a keen interest in the region’s politics.


47 posted on 11/14/2007 7:03:11 PM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
From the linked article: "Aramco is one of the lowest cost producers on the planet. Saudi can produce a barrel for less than $2 and can bring on incremental production capacity ..."

There is a saying that one should never get in an argument with somebody who buys ink by the barrel.

Similarly, one should never get in a price war with a nation which can produce oil for $2 per barrel. At some point the people who are investing in alternative energy schemes are going to find themselves producing product which is not price competitive even with vast government subsidies.

50 posted on 11/14/2007 7:07:18 PM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

“Canada is one of the world’s costliest oil producers and requires high prices to remain viable, Saudi Arabia’s oil minister said in Riyadh on Tuesday, suggesting Saudi Arabia is a better value for investors.”

At the rate OPEC is going, Canadian oil will soon be very price competitive.


59 posted on 11/14/2007 7:36:50 PM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
Alberta need prices to be at least $40 to $60 US a barrel to develop the massive reserves

Ablerta oil sands facilities have gotten the cost way cheaper than that.

There are $150 Billion in new projects are various stages ongoing.

Inventory of Major Alberta Projects
http://www.alberta-canada.com/statpub/albertaConstructionProjects/mpgetem.cfm

60 posted on 11/14/2007 7:38:50 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson