Skip to comments.Thompson Argues Polls Will Change
Posted on 11/15/2007 3:49:47 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Republican presidential hopeful Fred Thompson brushed off concerns Thursday about his single-digit showings in recent Iowa and New Hampshire polls, saying he expects a new television ad on immigration will help boost his numbers. "In the past, a lot of things have changed in the Iowa presidential elections - Howard Dean can tell you that," he said, referring to 2004 when Dean's third-place showing in Iowa derailed his campaign for the Democratic nomination.
"So you've just got to do what you do and keep at it and understand that the end of the day is all that counts," he said.
CBS/New York Times polls in Iowa and New Hampshire show Thompson at 9 and 5 percent for Republicans, respectively. Mitt Romney leads both states with 34 percent in New Hampshire and 27 percent in Iowa.
Thompson, who was in New York for a fundraiser and a closed town-hall meeting, said he expects his recently released television ad in Iowa to help sway voters in that crucial state. The ad stresses the need to secure U.S. borders and enforce immigration laws.
Illegal immigration has divided Republicans and remains a critical issue to many GOP voters. This past summer, Arizona Sen. John McCain supported legislation that would have strengthened border security and allowed for many illegal immigrants to become citizens. The leading GOP contenders, Romney and Rudy Giuliani, both opposed the legislation, which was backed by President Bush (website - news - bio) but failed in the Senate.
On Thursday, Thompson reiterated that the government should strip federal dollars from cities and states that don't report illegal immigrants, and he criticized Giuliani for "going to court to preserve sanctuary cities" while he was mayor of New York City.
Giuliani has defended New York's so-called sanctuary policy, which stopped city workers from reporting suspected illegal immigrants. He sued the federal government to keep his city's policy.
"If we will enforce the border, if we will stop inducements like sanctuary cities, and we will tell employers that they're going to have to obey the law too, then over a period of time, this situation will turn much to the good," Thompson said.
The former Tennessee senator tried to highlight other differences between himself and Giuliani, who has been a supporter of gun control and abortion. Thompson is opposed to both.
He also said the Romney campaign should stop "whining" about losing the National Right To Life Committee's endorsement to him. Thompson said he believed the endorsement would help at the polls.
Ah, nothing like the smell of unbridled optimism when you wake up in the morning. :)
Does anyone know of a site that lists all the primaries, delegates available, and their vote dates? Thanks.
BOB DOLE BOB DOLE BOB DOLE BOB DOLE
REAGANESQUE, REAGANESQUE, REAGANESQUE, REAGANESQUE
Bob Dole, your name is Romney.
I support Fred...but I think you overstate the NRTL endorsements impact. I think Fred’s position on abortion makes sense, but a lot of hard core anti-abortionists don’t seem to agree with me.
Another babbling anti-Fred suffering yet another psychotic hissyfit.
I just can’t imagine voting for any of the rest of them.
Obviously being a RudyBot,I doubt that there are ANY conservatives you would support. You're lost in Rudyville, for a McCain-light liberal.
Thompson let Clinton skate on Chinese abuses which Reagan would have exposed in a heartbeat; he is therefore unqualified to be the POTUS.
Do you care to back up your accusation with cold hard facts?
Or are you just a drive-by poster?
See my tagline...
Endorsements don’t mean squat.
Only the most informed voter’s even know what the NRLC is.
How did he do this?
Not if he doesn’t get off his lazy ass and take this run seriously!
“I’m sorry, but he’s not even close to Reagan.”
Reagan wasn’t Reagan until he served a few years in the White House.
Anybody who is engaged on the Right-to-Life issue knows exactly who the National Right To Life Committee is.
You will have to try harder to minimize this great endorsement!
Wow 2DV, the crazies are out tonight...
Try here. Good site for all sorts of election minutiae.
I didn’t realize you posted here, Mr. Dole.
And no, I'm not going to go and do your homework for you. You go and google the subject and then come back here and refute what I've said.
I will NEVER vote for Fred Thompson because of the ChiCom BS, and I would hope that anyone who remembers feels likewise.
That said, I don't have a preferred candidate; I just know that Fred doesn't fill the bill. Unless a Republican statesman steps up we stand a strong chance of having a dem in the Oval Office in January of 2009.
I’m not used to not having someone at home to discuss this with. My husband passed away in July, and after almost 50 years of marriage, the two things that we agreed on was politic's and religion. I really miss his input.
Keep dreaming. No one will vote for a man that shows no desire for the office!
Only the most informed voters even know what the NRLC is.
Okay, then why did Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee fight so hard to get the NRLC endorsement, if it wouldn't have done them any good? Why did uber-Mittwit Paul Weyrich whine, moan and accuse Team Fred of bribery when Willard was denied the prize? Same reason you're tying to downplay it, I presume.
So you are saying that pro-lifer's aren't aware of the largest grassroots pro-life organization in the United States? Sounds like that tripe the media is always spewing about evangelicals being misinformed sheeple and easily led by their preachers and televangelists. Do you agree with the MSM?
Right, because unbridled lust for power is an attractive quality in a candidate, just look at what it does for Hillary.
“No one will vote for a man that shows no desire for the office!”
Exactly why i’ll vote for him. Because he’s not someone that is in it for power. He’s in it because people think he could do something great for this country. The others just seem frothing at the mouth power hungry. No thank you!
“I’m sorry, but he’s not even close to Reagan.”
Odd complaint coming from a Rudy man.
“I would happily vote for Guiliani, but if McCain is the Veep, no thanks. I’ll stay home.
You Rudy people keeping an eye on FR, please take that to note.”
I just know the political apathy that is within the Evangelical/pro life ranks. I would go so far as to say that 9 out of 10 voters’ that say that they are pro life haven’t a clue about this organization.
“That said, I don’t have a preferred candidate;”
See post 36
Then it's the Fred Thompson supporters and Team Fred's job to get that information out there. Maybe Fred should make a pro-life commercial with the people from NRLC. Show it in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. His anti-illegal amnesty ad will change some minds, if I know politics.
The conservative pro-life faction of the Republican party is hopelessly divided between all the major candidates—yes, even Giuliani. There is no evidence yet that this one endorsement is going to change any of that.
Fred, not that I’m complaining or anything (which I am) — it’s about time you started caring about polls and such before it is too late and we are stuck with Rudy McRomney......PLEASE!
Dont get me wrong I hope to cast my vote for Fred in the GE. He gave me pause yesterday by not being for the HLA. My only two other concerns is clean out the closets now and how serious is his desire for potus.
Look, I'm not happy with the crop of candidates we have (Rudy included), but Fred has been trotted out to address those concerns, and has been presented as the "Next Reagan", and nothing could be further from the truth.
Most of them don’t like Fred because they hopped into bed with other candidates too soon. The NRTL endorsement is HUGE. That’s why it sent a shockwave through the pundit class, as well as the Huckabee and Romney campaigns. Did you hear Hugh Hewitt completely lose it yesterday? The endorsement is HUGE.
What would you like him to do?
Tell the reporters that due to his falling polls he’s quitting?
What else can he say in public?
Funny, because I worked for President Reagan and I disagree with you. Are they the same man? OF COURSE NOT!! Is Fred the closest we'll get to Mr. Reagan in the foreseeable future? Hell yes!!
Not a thing in public, BUT his late start is being compounded by his slow start. I am worried. I want a TRUE conservative to run. I am banking on Fred or Duncan Hunter.
What would you like him to do? Tell the reporters that due to his falling polls hes quitting?
Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
Self ^ | 11/11/07 | Kevmo
Posted on 11/15/2007 3:43:17 AM PST by Kevmo
I’ll bet you would. Still wouldn’t help Hunter overcome his Hunter problem. But our opinions differ on that, even though my opinion is reality based and yours is in Hunter-la-la-land.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.