Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy's Gamble: Giuliani's audacious strategy for the nomination
The Wall Street Journal ^ | November 16, 2007 | KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL

Posted on 11/15/2007 11:40:48 PM PST by Aristotelian

Give Rudy Giuliani this: He's living his campaign slogans. The flinty ex-mayor keeps telling America he's fearless, a risk-taker, the guy who can accomplish the impossible (say, cleaning up Sin City). As if to prove it, he's betting the shop on a high-stakes path to the Republican nomination.

Ever since a relatively unknown Georgia peanut farmer used the early primary states to garner the national spotlight, the track to the presidential nomination has run square through Iowa, New Hampshire and (more recently) South Carolina. . . .

It's been clear for some time that Mr. Giuliani was putting his chips on bigger, if later, primary states such as Florida, California and New York--where a less ideological Republican electorate might prove more open to his social record. Still, there was something about Mr. DuHaime confirming this approach--and by extension dissing the usual three-state slingshot--that had a national press corps blinking. It also earned the Giuliani camp a scoffing dismissal from rival Mitt Romney. . . .

Let's be clear, some of this is simple necessity. You might even say Mr. Giuliani didn't have a choice. Iowa's caucus system, dominated by social conservatives, was never going to blow kisses at the pro-choice, antigun New Yorker--Pat Robertson notwithstanding. . . .

At the same time, this year's primary fight, and in particular the Republican race, are unique. The Giuliani wisdom, if that's what it proves to be, has been in recognizing those differences early on and toiling ever since to ply them to the mayor's advantage.

Changed circumstance No. 1 is this year's hypercompressed primary season. . . .

Changed circumstance No. 2 is the unusual nature of the Republican field itself, in which there is no clear front-runner and voter confusion. . . .

Finally, there's Mr. Giuliani, superstar.

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; giuliani
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

That caveat is told to every investor when considering a mutual fund or some other investment strategy. It is, in a way, self-evident. But is also implies this -- there are other ways to skin a cat.

That's what Rudy's doing. He exploring a new way. In that regard, he's trail-blazing. And I say, Good for him.

1 posted on 11/15/2007 11:40:50 PM PST by Aristotelian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

As long as that trail goes to Mars...I like it.


2 posted on 11/15/2007 11:47:41 PM PST by Rick_Michael (The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Why would any conservative be rooting for a “pro-choice, antigun New Yorker (ie, liberal)?”


3 posted on 11/16/2007 12:03:29 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
Rudy identified his constituency very accurately and has pursued them successfully. And, on the other hand, he has similarly learned not to waste inordinate resources chasing rainbows or so-cons.

A variation on the simplest of strategies, used even by simple beasts: Lick the hand that feeds you and avoid the one that beats you.

4 posted on 11/16/2007 12:12:23 AM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Why would a conservative favor Giuliani? Here’s why:

His stance on economic policy, notably taxation. Rudy is closer to Reagan on economic-tax policy than any other GOP candidate. He knows how an economy works. And he knows government’s place in the economy, as shown by his tax-cutting record as NYC mayor.

5 posted on 11/16/2007 12:21:47 AM PST by Aristotelian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
That's what Rudy's doing. He exploring a new way.

Campaigning for the presidency as an open, flaming liberal scarcely qualifies as "a new way," really.

6 posted on 11/16/2007 12:23:08 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Hillary made an unqualified bar bouncer, security head
in the WH.

Rudy made his unqualified driver, police chief and
pimped him as homeland security chief.

Not much difference between the two!


7 posted on 11/16/2007 12:28:16 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Of course, Rudy has also worked to change the rules in his favor.

1) Changing the allocation of electors, distributing them equally to congressional districts making Democrat districts with few Republicans equal to major Republican strongholds.

and 2) Moving the election up from June to February.

In effect, he is letting the liberal districts gain power and minimizing Republicans. Nothing like stabbing the electorate in the back. He’s following in Arnold’s footsteps in his “trailblazing,” hardly something to celebrate.


8 posted on 11/16/2007 1:21:59 AM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Whatever I think of Giuliani and his attempt to “empower” liberal and moderate Republicans, it’s about time we spread the power to nominate beyond two or three little states which, if the polls are to be believed, certainly aren’t doing the conservatives any favors this time around.


9 posted on 11/16/2007 2:47:41 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (I'm starting to think I need a new party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
His stance on economic policy, notably taxation. Rudy is closer to Reagan on economic-tax policy than any other GOP candidate. He knows how an economy works. And he knows government’s place in the economy, as shown by his tax-cutting record as NYC mayor.

He also knows how to grab guns (lawsuits agains gun manufacturers), promote the gay agenda, support abortion, and support illegal immigration. Rudy supported last summer's shamesty, hardly a stance for someone who is genuinely concerned about reducing taxes and spending given the enormous costs that bill would have inflicted on us.

Whatever pluses Rudy may have, his minuses far outweigh them......he is a disaster waiting to happen.

10 posted on 11/16/2007 4:18:40 AM PST by HerrBlucher (He's the coolest thing around, gonna shut HRC down, gonna turn it on, wind it up, blow em out, FDT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
Whatever pluses Rudy may have, his minuses far outweigh them......he is a disaster waiting to happen

Hillary is a disaster that will happen if we do not rally around whoever is nominated.

I will never forget the frustration I suffered watching the idiot Ross Perot put us in a situation where we are today with Hillary.

11 posted on 11/16/2007 4:40:06 AM PST by GWB00 (Barbara Streisand barely made it out of high school.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GWB00
Hillary is a disaster that will happen if we do not rally around whoever is nominated.

They are both disasters. I took some consolation that Rudy would not bring in Soros and gang but that consolation was tossed out the window on another thread. So all that is left is Rudy isn't Hillary....yah that is something to really rally around.....

12 posted on 11/16/2007 4:44:44 AM PST by HerrBlucher (He's the coolest thing around, gonna shut HRC down, gonna turn it on, wind it up, blow em out, FDT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

gee it seem his strategy was just get money to huckabee as vote splitter.

Giuliani’s strategy is not to get the most votes, Giuliani’s strategy is to split the non-giuliani votes as much as possible.


13 posted on 11/16/2007 4:45:35 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Rudy can manipulate all he likes to get the nomination.

Only problem he has is that he cannot force voters to the polls to vote for him on election day....well, at least not yet. But I am sure he is the type that might look to finding a way to do that.


14 posted on 11/16/2007 4:51:19 AM PST by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Why would any conservative be rooting for a “pro-choice...

Here's my take. Rudy would not do anything to set back the strides made against abortion; if a Dem is elected the set back will take years from which to recover. Maybe the conservatives' motto on this one should be 'live to fight another day'.

15 posted on 11/16/2007 4:56:51 AM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye

No, conservatives should fight today.


16 posted on 11/16/2007 5:01:50 AM PST by fetal heart beats by 21st day (Defending human life is not a federalist issue. It is the business of all of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Why would any conservative be rooting for a “pro-choice, antigun New Yorker (ie, liberal)?”


Two reasons: Hillary, and he cleaned up New York.


17 posted on 11/16/2007 5:03:40 AM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fetal heart beats by 21st day
No, conservatives should fight today.

I agree, conservatives should fight today for the right candidate. My comment was directed more to if Rudy gets the nomination. It is my opinion that a President Rudy will not damage the abortion "status quo" while a Dem certainly will do so.

18 posted on 11/16/2007 5:08:44 AM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye

I see no evidence from Rudy’s life to suggest I should trust him on anything.


19 posted on 11/16/2007 5:31:15 AM PST by fetal heart beats by 21st day (Defending human life is not a federalist issue. It is the business of all of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

More pro-Rudi propaganda from the Murdoch-owned WSJ/FNC mediaplex.


20 posted on 11/16/2007 6:13:38 AM PST by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson