Posted on 11/16/2007 3:25:10 PM PST by COUNTrecount
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton's camp tried to convince voters on Friday that she had put a bad two-week stretch behind her and emerged strong from her debate performance in Las Vegas.
The Clinton campaign put together video clips of some of her remarks at the debate showing her fighting back and defending herself against her rivals. The videos were turned into a Web appeal asking for campaign contributions.
"In the November 15 Democratic debate in Las Vegas, when there was the most at stake, Hillary put on her best performance. She was prepared, firm, and 100 percent ready to lead America," said a statement posted on the Web video link, which was available on her campaign's Web site.
Clinton, a New York senator, needed a smooth debate performance to try to tamp down an emerging notion that her air of invincibility had been punctured by a lackluster showing at the last debate on October 30 and a series of other seeming missteps.
In Las Vegas, she shifted from an above-the-fray style to one of attacking her closest challengers, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama and former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, accusing Edwards in particular of slinging mud.
Obama and Edwards refused to cede any ground to Clinton despite glowing descriptions of the former first lady's performance from various political experts such as the Des Moines Register's leading political writer Daniel Yepsen, whose column headline was a play on the words of an old Frank Sinatra song: "That's Why the Lady is a Champ."
Clinton, Obama and Edwards are all in a tight race in Iowa, which on January 3 kicks off the state-by-state battles to pick the Democratic and Republican candidates who will face off in the November 4, 2008, election.
A victory in Iowa can generate momentum heading into the next state contest, in New Hampshire, and beyond.
TAXES AND SOCIAL SECURITY
Obama's campaign challenged Clinton's debate answers on questions about how to keep the Social Security retirement benefits system solvent in coming decades.
The Obama camp circulated a letter to Clinton written by an Iowa citizen, Tod Bowman of Maquoketa.
Bowman noted that Obama had clearly stated he would be in favor of raising Social Security taxes for high-income earners. He also said Clinton attacked Obama for the position despite having told him, Bowman, she would consider raising those taxes as well, during an October 7 event in his hometown.
"It just gives the impression that you're not being straight with people about where you stand. And if you won't be straight with us on the campaign trail, how can we be sure you'll be honest with the American people when you're president?" Bowman asked.
The Edwards camp criticized Clinton's debate comments on the North American Free Trade Agreement, the U.S.-Canada-Mexico trade accord that many Americans believe has cost the United States jobs.
Eager for support from union workers, the Edwards campaign criticized Clinton for having "laughed off" a question about NAFTA by saying, "All I can remember from that is a bunch of charts."
Clinton's husband, then-President Bill Clinton, had signed the NAFTA accord when he was in office in the 1990s. She did say that NAFTA "did not do what many had hoped" and that "we do need to figure out how we're going to have trade relations that are smart."
Long-shot Democratic candidate Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut senator, accused all three -- Clinton, Edwards and Obama -- of dodging questions, and singled out Obama in particular for speaking without clarity on whether illegal immigrants should qualify for drivers licenses.
Dodd criticized Clinton for a last-minute shift in her position on the topic, from saying at the last debate it "makes a lot of sense," to being against it once New York state killed a proposal that would have allowed undocumented workers to get drivers licenses.
"Instead of clarity, we've been treated to a procession of flip-flopping, hyper-qualification and answers of convenience," Dodd said
She won the debate in the same way crooked lawyers win in a kangaroo court. But I’m just as pleased as I can be that she thinks winning among a field of seven dwarfs is a big deal. It means she won’t be ready for the real debates when she mixes it up with the grown ups.
Wolf Licksher did a good job. He can sleep better and his pets are safe......for now.
She was playing with loaded dice in Las Vegas. .............
You notice that there has been no mention of her dreadful answer on education. The teachers’ union must be going nuts.
Biden came off as the most personable of the group (I only lasted 50 minutes before I had to tune out, couldn’t take that woman anymore).
Hillary talking about mud throwing is like having Bill talk about marital fidelity.
Asking and expecting an answer about licenses for illegals is a legitimate question. Pointing out that Hillary does not answer questions is just pointing out the obvious, she is trying to intimidate them into shutting up and it worked with CNN.
Hello, Bowman? It's 2007. Where have you been since 1992?
Can't wait to see what happens after she loses the general election - bitch about the electoral college - again?
She is such a joke.
Nope. She needs a lot more cowbell than she has now before America will buy this crapola. There is something missing and she won't find it in rigged beauty contests.
Speaking of throwing mud, Mrs. Edwards has been silent of late.
FWIW, I watched the whole, gut-churning two hours.
I (obviously) don’t have a dog in this fight, but would say that Bill Richardson won.
She won a pass.
The (Red)Star Tribune reports that the she-beast came out strong and back on target. Of course, their editorial staff would make a mining camp whore blush with shame...
Her "winning the debate" is about as genuine as AlGore's Nobel Prize.
I agree. Any objective observer who left partisanship or emotion at the door and really listened to the questions and answers would have to count Joe Biden as the most impressive, articulate, experienced and logical candidate in last night’s debate.
Americans (even Democrates), should really listen with understanding. We are not picking “most popular”. We are choosing the very best person running to be President. Each party should send up their most qualified not their most histrionically attached.
Hillary’s debate performance stunk. I degraded myself for two hours watching that garbage. If she is a serious contender then we are in big trouble.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.