Skip to comments.
Rhetoric of illegal-immigration opponents is disturbing, critics say
The Sacramento Bee ^
| SUSAN FERRISS
Posted on 11/23/2007 11:45:12 AM PST by Dubya
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
To: Lancey Howard
What the hell is this shill smoking? We don’t need a “rational debate over immigration,” we need these lawbreakers deported. Pretty basic logic.
42
posted on
11/23/2007 3:14:11 PM PST
by
ought-six
("Give me liberty, or give me death!")
To: no-to-illegals
Both he and his son freep so they may see this.
To: no-to-illegals
The true cry is, Get Used To It American...
44
posted on
11/23/2007 4:58:58 PM PST
by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: Dubya
Illegal immigration will destroy America if gone unchecked.
45
posted on
11/23/2007 5:03:40 PM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
To: no-to-illegals
“....but that is just me”
70% of America is behind us.
46
posted on
11/23/2007 5:04:47 PM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
To: ApplegateRanch
47
posted on
11/23/2007 5:05:29 PM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
To: elpadre
Could the telephone call been a setup? sounds like it! Often, so I understand, these advocacy groups use such devises to exaggerate their position.
Are you suggesting that no one posting on this thread owns a telephone? Or that every other post is in any way dissimilar to the voice message which was left? So I understand.
|
|
|
48
posted on
11/23/2007 5:06:34 PM PST
by
Hornitos
To: businessprofessor
The article says it was advertised as spanish as a second language. You are right, and the best time to learn a language is while you are very young. After 9 or 10, it becomes much more difficult.
49
posted on
11/23/2007 5:07:10 PM PST
by
ga medic
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, is cited by the ADL for calling illegal immigration a "slow-motion terrorist attack." The ADL cites comments by D.A. King of Georgia, who founded an anti-illegal-immigrant group called the Dustin Inman Society. He has appeared on CNN and testified before a congressional committee.
In April, a newspaper report said, King told a gathering of Georgia Republican Party members that illegal immigrants are "not here to mow your lawn -- they're here to blow up your buildings and kill your children, and you and me."
Even for the Destroy-Our-Sovereignty Media, this is slimy. Do you see what they're trying to do to Steve? They've quoted another man named King in paragraph two to give those who don't pay close attention the idea that Steve King made the comment in paragraph three. Unreal.
You should show this to him.
50
posted on
11/23/2007 5:08:44 PM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Our God-given rights, and those of our posterity, are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: All
The Republican Party leadership (president and a small number of Republican senators like McCain) needs to be changed, or the Republican Party is done for.
To: Travis McGee
Post 40 is a good one, thanks.
52
posted on
11/23/2007 5:36:45 PM PST
by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: no-to-illegals
I don’t see what any of this has to do with a preschool offering to teach 4 year olds how to speak Spanish. Does this somehow equate with terrorists?
53
posted on
11/23/2007 5:46:33 PM PST
by
ga medic
To: EternalVigilance
I saw it but didn’t read too much into it. We’ll keep an eye on it.
To: Dubya
I think both sides sound like retards. The difference is the pro-illegals sound like fools 100% of the time, while the antis sound like idiots 85% of the time.
55
posted on
11/23/2007 6:45:51 PM PST
by
Clemenza
(Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
To: gubamyster
56
posted on
11/23/2007 7:53:35 PM PST
by
TheLion
(How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
To: YellowRoseofTx
That’s where I stopped.
Facts not included under the definition of “rhetoric.”
57
posted on
11/23/2007 7:58:11 PM PST
by
bannie
To: Brilliant
“I think the pro-immigration rhetoric is far more disturbing.”
I’m pro-immigration...
What is it that you consider disturbing about my “rhetoric?”
To: Dubya
Several more callers complained to her after the August TV report that she was catering to Mexicans, and a neighbor struck up a conversation with her to blame Mexicans, Dupre said, for everything wrong -- including grocery prices.Whether it's in conversation, on Web sites or flowing from cable TV and radio talk shows, the shrillness of the anti-illegal-immigration debate has become disturbing, say groups that monitor hate speech. It will become even more "disturbing" if some thing is not done soon. Americans are slowly waking to the fact that their government, with the help of bleeding heart groups, have sold them out.
59
posted on
11/23/2007 8:59:27 PM PST
by
Razz Barry
(Round'em up, send'em home.)
To: Travis McGee
60
posted on
11/23/2007 9:32:28 PM PST
by
PGalt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson