Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cancer-resistant mouse discovered
EurekAlert ^ | 27-Nov-2007 | Vivek Rangnekar

Posted on 11/26/2007 9:17:53 PM PST by crazyshrink

LEXINGTON, Ky. (November 27, 2007) − A mouse resistant to cancer, even highly-aggressive types, has been created by researchers at the University of Kentucky. The breakthrough stems from a discovery by UK College of Medicine professor of radiation medicine Vivek Rangnekar and a team of researchers who found a tumor-suppressor gene called "Par-4" in the prostate.

The researchers discovered that the Par-4 gene kills cancer cells, but not normal cells. There are very few molecules that specifically fight against cancer cells, giving it a potentially therapeutic application.

Funded by several grants from the National Institutes of Health, Rangnekar's study is unique in that mice born with this gene are not developing tumors. The mice grow normally and have no defects. In fact, the mice possessing Par-4 actually live a few months longer than the control animals, indicating that they have no toxic side effects.

"We originally discovered Par-4 in the prostate, but it's not limited to the prostate. The gene is expressed in every cell type that we've looked at and it induces the death of a broad range of cancer cells, including of course, cancer cells in the prostate," said Rangnekar. "The interesting part of this study is that this killer gene is selective for killing cancer cells. It will not kill normal cells and there are very, very few selective molecules out there like this."

To further investigate the potential therapeutic benefits of this gene, Rangnekar's team introduced it into the egg of a mouse. That egg was then planted into a surrogate mother.

"The mouse itself does not express a large number of copies of this gene, but the pups do and then their pups start expressing the gene," Rangnekar said. "So, we've been able to transfer this activity to generations in the mouse."

The implications for humans could be that through bone marrow transplantation, the Par-4 molecule could potentially be used to fight cancer cells in patients without the toxic and damaging side effects of chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

"When a cancer patient goes to the clinic, they undergo chemotherapy or radiation and there are potential side effects associated with these treatments," Rangnekar said. "We got interested in looking for a molecule which will kill cancer cells and not kill normal cells, but also would not be toxic with regard to the production of side effects to the entire organism. We are thinking of this in a holistic approach that not only would get rid of the tumor, but also not harm the organism as a whole. Before this animal study, we published a lot of work indicating that in cell culture, there's no killing of normal cells. This is the proof that it doesn’t kill normal cells because the mouse is alive and healthy."

Rangnekar admits there is much more work to be done before this research can be applied to humans, but agrees that is the most logical next step.

"I look at this research from the standpoint of how it can be developed to the benefit of the cancer patient and that's really what keeps us focused all this time," said Rangnekar. "If you look at the pain that cancer patients go through, not just from the disease, but also from the treatment – it's excruciating. If you have someone in your family, like I did, who has gone through that, you know you can see that pain. If you can not only treat the cancer, but also not harm the patient, that's a major breakthrough. That's happening with these animals and I think that's wonderful."

### The research was published in the October edition of the journal Cancer Research. Dr. Rangnekar holds the Alfred Cohen, M.D., Endowed Chair in Oncology Research, and serves as the associate director (for translational research), at the Markey Cancer Center.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: writtenbyamyratliff

1 posted on 11/26/2007 9:17:54 PM PST by crazyshrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tioga

REad in them morning........the eyes are tired tonight.


2 posted on 11/26/2007 9:19:46 PM PST by tioga (Dear Santa..........I can explain....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink
Go to fullsize image

"Here I come to save the daaaaaay!" 

3 posted on 11/26/2007 9:22:47 PM PST by Redcloak (This post certified 100% Hillary-free. um... Never mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

Fascinating.

Thanks.


4 posted on 11/26/2007 9:27:31 PM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink
I read they had a cancer free mouse a few years ago. They stumbled onto it when the mouse didn't die as expected during some experiments they were conducting. They fed it higher does of the agent that they had used in the experiment. That mouse loved it. It was a big deal I swear. Then I never heard of it again ... maybe it was a dream.

Regards

5 posted on 11/26/2007 10:27:30 PM PST by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.. (A "Concerned Citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

I read a report similar to this one about a year ago. In that report the mice were injected with a broad spectrum of cancers and were healed by a new gene. I’ll see if I can find that report and link it here. It may be the same study.


6 posted on 11/26/2007 10:39:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink
A Paradigm for Cancer Treatment Using the Retinoblastoma Gene in a Mouse Model
http://www.annalsnyas.org/cgi/content/abstract/886/1/12

White Blood Cells From Cancer-resistant Mice Cure Cancers In Ordinary Mice  (I believe this was the article I remembered)
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/05/060509094714.htm


One of the most frustrating things about being a research scientist, would be knowing you were on the road to a clear cure, but it would take a few years to get there.

IMO, some of the testing should be eliminated.  Go the normal route of testing for part of the discovery process, but allow some terminally ill patients to volunteer as test subjects if all other prospects for cures were proven not to be effective.  What would that type of patient have to lose?  And the possibility that a clear cure would come years faster would far outweigh the risks.

7 posted on 11/26/2007 10:49:59 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

Don’t know if I could take two a day.


8 posted on 11/26/2007 10:57:19 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (No buy China!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

I hope the dose is administered orally.


9 posted on 11/26/2007 11:01:21 PM PST by Jeff Chandler ("Liberals want to save the world for the children they aren't having." -Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

bump


10 posted on 11/26/2007 11:11:32 PM PST by Centurion2000 (False modesty is as great a sin as false pride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

LOL! Part of the SF hit parade otherwise!


11 posted on 11/26/2007 11:20:25 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (No buy China!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink
The good news... They have found a mouse that doesn't get cancer.

The bad news... Humans will have to eat 6 times their body weight in cheese to duplicate that...

12 posted on 11/27/2007 1:47:22 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

My grandparents on both sides lived into their 90s, cancer free, and I recall as a small child, listening to my great-grandmother talking about choosing a marriage partner, should be no insanity, cancer, or criminality in the family background of the potential spouse...

Then I remember hearing in school about how people once thought these things were genetically determined, but that this was old-fashioned and illogical.

Things that make you go, “hmmmmmmm....”


13 posted on 11/27/2007 1:54:56 AM PST by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

Several times they alternate references to “gene” and “molecule” making it quite difficult to tell what they are talking about by this Par-4 — a gene that works from within a cell whose presence causes any would-be cancerous mutant cell to die instead of proliferating, or a chemical entity produced by a gene in normal cells that poisons only cancer cells. I would hope they would soon isolate this chemical entity if it is one.


14 posted on 11/27/2007 1:58:34 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Maybe you have to snort it.


15 posted on 11/27/2007 1:59:37 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson