Posted on 11/26/2007 11:26:55 PM PST by gpapa
Actually I am on the exact same page with you! I believe El Morte (LOL) and President Bush are both dangerously stupid. I like Bibi. Israel needs a hardliner now. Israel could have repelled Iran/Syria’s ambitions by at least a decade but due to El Morte’s incompetence and left wing BS, we will see Israel attacked with chemical and probably a nuclear weapon.
Me too and I believe that either the United States or President Bush or both are shortly going to experience a disaster fot this.
I, personally am against this all the way.
Just thought it need repeating. Better read it George.
2 Peter 1:20 -- First of all you must understand this, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation
Without being verbose, I don’t disagree with your thoughts here. I don’t believe anyone knows at what exact time these things will take place, but I wouldn’t bet against your dream either. We just don’t know.
I appreciate your comments. I’m going to have to hit the hay pretty quick. Take care.
I don’t follow Gaffney closely. It seems he has some pretty dire concerns about this conference. Seeing those concerns as he did, he was compelled to level both barrels. And that may have been inappropriate. I do think this conference is ill advised in the extreme, but others are quite certian it offers up no dire consequences so we’ll have to wait and see.
Remember that Arab girl that we’ve read about on the forum, the one that was gang raped, then punished more severely than the rapists? I kindof see Israel in that light. It is attacked time after time after time, then it is scolded by the whole planet for reacting, and then it is forced into these conferences where it is demanded to give up more in the interest of peace. And what penalty do the Palestinians pay? Why none of course.
Israel gets the 200 lashes and a time out in the dog house, and the Palestinians get some U.S. representative to demand statehood on their behalf, and half ownership of Jerusalem.
If only you and I could only be punished like the Palestinians are.
Yep, we’re on the same page there. Glad to see it.
At the minimum we have to understand what “that day” is referring to in order to make sense of the scripture.
I’m against it all the way as well, but I don’t want to be in the position of predicting a disaster. We have opened ourselves up to disaster with our unconcionable immigration policies, but I don’t want to express the idea Bush or the U.S. will be harmed.
I would hope fervently that would not be the case.
Thank you for the comments.
The disaster may well be to find that this has set up Israel for some nefarious attack, and now we have to go over there and fix things. Or is the point of the whole charade to create a state out of these thugs, so that when (not if) that state attacks Israel, Israel may now feel free to conquer it like we did Iraq?
Ya know, I wonder how much MusCrap is going on in Saudi Arabia on the quiet that is the same as the more openly reported region of Iran? (Like Iran’s morals police that have license to kill.)
Impeaching Bush would help get more Republicans into COngress.
His failure to uphold his oath of office in enfrocing our border laws is certainly an impeachable offense.
On the other hand, it would put Ms. Pelosi one step closer to the White House.
She seemed like a very intelligent and crafty woman. But then I got to see her in action. Pathetic.
Frank Gaffney nails it - ping!
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
Never having arguments taken seriously by the State Department should qualify Gaffney as the country's top foreign policy maker.
... sure shoot the messenger. What he is saying is 100% true, much as you may hate to admit it. The state department likes to appease terrorists so you are probably right though. They will never listen to him or anyone else with a clue, but then they never have.
If the events resemble the events at Munich - 1938, with Condi declaring a a variaton of “Peace in Our Time” - it certainly could be declared a “rape of Israel”.
Prime Minister Chamberlain negotiated with Herr Hitler and gave away the Sudetenland - portions of Czechoslovakia. It was easy to give away portions of another country . . . hoping for peace! But the result was the appeasement of a monster, and the results were not what he expected. To paraphrase Winston Churchill, Chamberlain gave away his honor for peace, and ened up with neither.
If Israel is coerced to give away concessions without getting anything in return - it truly will resemble Munich, 1938 - and that doesn’t speak well for our President or Sec’y of State.
Mike
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.