Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revisionism and The Iranian Non-Bomb
NRO ^ | 12-3-07 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 12/04/2007 11:35:23 AM PST by rightinthemiddle

The latest news from Iran about the supposed abandonment in 2003 of the effort to produce a Bomb — if even remotely accurate — presents somewhat of a dilemma for liberal Democrats.

Are they now to suggest that Republicans have been warmongering over a nonexistent threat for partisan purposes? But to advance that belief is also to concede that Iran, like Libya, likely came to a conjecture (around say early spring 2003?) that it was not wise for regimes to conceal WMD programs, given the unpredictable, but lethal American military reaction.

After all, what critic would wish now to grant that one result of the 2003 war — aside from the real chance that Iraq can stabilize and function under the only consensual government in the region — might have been the elimination, for some time, of two growing and potentially nuclear threats to American security, quite apart from Saddam Hussein?

War is unpredictable and instead of "no blood for oil" (oil went from $20 something to $90 something a barrel after the war, enriching Iraq and the Arab Gulf region at our expense), perhaps the cry, post facto, should have been "no blood for the elimination of nukes."

In the meantime, expect a variety of rebuttals to this assurance that for 4 years the Iranians haven't gotten much closer to producing weapons grade materials.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; vdh; victordavishanson
Wish W would take some credit for this. No one in the MSM is going to give it to him.
1 posted on 12/04/2007 11:35:24 AM PST by rightinthemiddle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolik

VDH ping


2 posted on 12/04/2007 11:36:42 AM PST by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

what. we’re supposed to believe the little freak in Tehran has nothing up his sleeve?


3 posted on 12/04/2007 11:40:03 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (hillary clinton is vladimir putin in drag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

This is the Administration’s way of saying they won’t attack Iran to downplay the seriousness of there nuke making capability. This is either being done because:

1) Iran already has weapons grade Plutonium and now shutting down there Uranium enrichment is a waste of time.

2) The Administration does not have enough support to bomb Iran or fears the economic damage of short-term oil supply disruption could spark the pending recession early, being bad for the GOP coming into elections.


4 posted on 12/04/2007 1:46:07 PM PST by quant5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

That’s a pretty twisted justification. The 2003 war against Iraq’s phantom nukes deterred Iran from having phantom nukes of their own.


5 posted on 12/04/2007 11:55:30 PM PST by Deathmonger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson