Posted on 12/04/2007 12:41:39 PM PST by TornadoAlley3
Edited on 12/04/2007 3:13:26 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
She’s found her 15 minutes; http://hormonehigh.blogspot.com/
That’s right. She and Pamela Rogers Turner (the hotter of the two, IMO) both had similar incidents about the same time, and that sort of spawned the whole “not guilty” meme we’re still stuck on here.
}:-)4
This is hardly violates the intent of the condition. Whatever happened to common sense?
Oh, I was just playing with the idea of “zero tolerance for zero tolerance policies”...
yeah, I’m with you - and I blame lawyers. Anyone that makes an independent discretionary decision can be sued by some ambulance chaser.
“Condition 69?” Now even 69 has a stigma.
I noticed that myself.
A better wording might have been
The violation listed says she talked to a 17-year-old coworker on several occasions.
It’s funny stuff, though. I can’t say exactly why, but it’s funny...........
This is pretty ridiculous. If she’s going to be allowed to work in a place where she HAS underage co-workers, it’s pretty unreasonable to expect her not to talk to them at all. This was a 17 year old girl (Lafave’s problematic history is with a male minor), and there’s no allegation of anything inappropriate in the conversation. It’s not clear, but sounds like the conversation occurred in the workplace.
There probably aren’t a lot of jobs open to her where the employer could guarantee there would never be any minors working there, and it’s completely unreasonable to expect an employer to schedule her around any minors’ schedules. Maybe certain factory jobs involving machinery that minors aren’t legally allowed to operate would be an option, but the court needs to require that if they’re going to arrest her for any communication at all with someone under 18.
Did you actually read the description of the violation?
BTW...I’d hit it. But I’d move and change my phone number afterward, because she looks like the creepy stalker type.
}:-)4
“Whatever happened to common sense?”
I take it you don’t have much contact with government workers, do you.
Just wait, though, under Hillary or Mitt these people would be in charge of your health care.
Only the excerpt on the thread. Sounds like she participated in ordinary social conversation around the meal-break table. No allegation of anything outside the workplace, or anything going beyond the bounds of what restaurant co-workers would normally gab about. Is there any allegation that the girl complained about it? Doesn’t sound like it from the manager’s reaction.
I actually do, and it is not friendly. I am known by the most powerful state employees in my state by the mere mention of my first name.
Hm. I've never met anybody named "A$$hole" before..... ;-)
Well, you don't expect us to let that opening go by unused, do you....?
And what are the conditions of her parole?
That’s close. It’s actaully Wise A$$.
That’s what I was thinking.
The United States...
Pretty much the only place in this hemisphere
where a 17yr old would be considered under the
age of consent.
Take our neighbors to the north and south.
Canada = 14
Mexico - 12
Of course we all know how morally bankrupt and depraved folks are in both Canada And Mexico /sarc
Age of consent used to be much lower across the US...just a few short years ago it ranged from 12-16 in most states. Not sure what happened to cause the change.
I think it was 13 in Ark when Clinton was the Gov... he must have had a good time.
In some states it is legal to marry someone far under their age of consent with parental approval.... now that is odd since it gives legal sanction for violating the law based solely on the consent of the parents.
How strange we have become in this country....
No wonder we have the largest prison population compared to any other nation per capita.
Land of the perpetually offended moral busybody.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.