Posted on 12/07/2007 8:10:37 AM PST by ZGuy
BLASPHEMER ALERT!!
You BOZO!!
LDS.org is not SCRIPTURE!!
--MormonDude(They never learn; do they Old Mountain Man?)
A sin of OMMission!
Looks like SOMEone didn't check for that BURNING before they so stupidly prophesied!
FALSE PROPHET ALERT!!!
So, has Jehovah, as a NAME, been abandoned when He became Incarnate?
Your posting incorrectly implied that we do not use the Bible. You should know that is not true, and if you repeat it I will consider it slanderous.
While the Bible proclaims how darned IMPORTANT it is!!
Not according to the Book.
Hebrews 9: 27
And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
Boo Hoo!
No, I said you don't use your BRAIN or EYES!
E>So, has Jehovah, as a NAME, been abandoned when He became Incarnate?
I did not make the quoted statement
Love it!
I shall make it a point in the future to ping you to the posts I find of so called evangelicals who blatantly state that will not vote for a Mormon, particularly Mitt Romney.
As for shut up....well then that may be your wish, but I understand that FR.com is a place for ideas and exchange.
I have read quite a number of posts that express exactly what I "claimed."
No offense intended but I believe that you are being silly about this.
~”If you want a humorous and factual look at it...”~
Humorous? Yes. Factual? Well... not so much. Maybe about 40% of the descriptions about Mormonism found in that episode are factual.
OK, so your question is:
“Why would the TEMPLE LOT group actually own the TEMPLE LOT?”
I must admit to some remaining confusion as to the substance of your question, but I found an answer to what I think is your question in the following page:
http://www.churchofchrist-tl.org/history.html
Please let me know if that doesn’t cover it.
~”What do you MEAN by: “the fullness of the Gospel”?”~
The Gospel of Jesus Christ, as taught in its original form by Christ and His apostles. Not the modified, redacted, edited, and misinterpreted forms that we see in mainstream Christianity today. There are many similarities between the two, but saving knowledge has been lost from orthodoxy along the way.
To the extent that the false doctrines of men lead us away from Christ, they are an abomination.
That does not mean that we should go around saying that you aren’t a Christian, or that you are deceptive or delusional. It just means you’re missing parts of the truth.
We learn from latter-day revelation, which confirms the teaching in the Bible, that the Aaronic Priesthood has authority to baptize with water, whereas the Melchizedek Priesthood has power to baptize not only with water but also to confer the Holy Ghost (D&C 13; JS-H 1: 68-72). We note also that John the Baptist, who had the Aaronic Priesthood, recognized this distinction and used it to illustrate one of the differences between his mission and the mission of Jesus, who had the priesthood of Melchizedek (Matt. 3: 11; Mark 1: 8; Luke 3: 15-16; John 1: 25-33; cf. Acts 8: 5-25).
Baptism is not optional if one wishes the fullness of salvation. Jesus said a person must be born of water and of the Spirit (John 3: 3-5). When he sent the twelve apostles forth to teach the gospel he told them that whosoever believed and was baptized would be saved; and whosoever did not believe would be damned (Mark 16: 16). Jesus himself was baptized “to fulfill all righteousness” (Matt. 3: 15; 2 Ne. 31: 4-11). But the Pharisees, being unwilling to accept the gospel “rejected the counsel of God against themselves, being not baptized” (Luke 7: 30).
Baptism is a most sacred ordinance, which a person, having received it, can remember throughout life as a reminder of the personal commitment to Jesus Christ. Its symbolism is beautiful, and its consequences ever so desirable. John the Baptist had the signal honor among all men to take the Son of God into the water and baptize him, after which he saw the Holy Ghost descend upon Jesus. By being baptized Jesus obeyed the law himself, and set the example for all mankind.
News flash CC neither has the Temple in Jerusalm been build yet!
This is true I have had them tell me to my face often!
There is a even Mike Huckabee attened an anti Mormon meeting to talk to them to take back the country for Jesus!
MyManMitt: Huckabee Spoke at "Anti-Mormon" Convention
The statement surely was not inclusive!
"No evangelical has said, "Romney should not be permitted to run for the Presidency because he is a Mormon."
And you post this:
I shall make it a point in the future to ping you to the posts I find of so called evangelicals who blatantly state that will not vote for a Mormon, particularly Mitt Romney.
All I wanted, was to be shown a statement, made in the PAST, on these threads, which you indicated you had seen, to be referenced.
Your present statement is a WIDER grasp than your first one:
I shall make it a point in the future to ping you to the posts I find of so called evangelicals who blatantly state that will not vote for a Mormon, particularly Mitt Romney.
While I appreciate that you will ping me to these statements, that may or may not appear in the future; I STILL would like a reference to those that HAVE been made.
My "put up or shut up" WAS too snippy to you.
I'd been dealing with other frustrating folks and I took it out on you. Sorry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.