Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times Set To Nuke Hillary? (Tomorrow?)
Riehl World View ^ | 12/15/07

Posted on 12/15/2007 8:27:52 AM PST by LdSentinal

New York Times Set To Nuke Hillary?

Drudge has this below up with no link. But pay attention to the reporter's name:

NYT Plans Sunday Exclusive on Questionable Clinton Library donors... Reporter Don Van Natta... Developing...

He's a serious award-winning investigative journalist ... and co-author with Jeff Gerth of Her Way:

link: Prosecutors later came to believe that Hillary had padded her bills; she "wasn't guilty of [knowingly] facilitating nefarious transactions -- she was guilty of doing less work than she took credit for," Jeff Gerth and Don Van Natta Jr. explain in their 2007 biography, Her Way. Hillary herself never took refuge in this explanation.

Somehow I'm thinking Hillary isn't pleased re Her Way:

Van Natta: "We also show that she has a sort of secret side to her Senate office. We call it the mysteries of Hillaryland in the book where she actually had people on, employees of hers, people on her payroll, who she did not divulge as she was supposed to, according to Senate rules, and we have ethics experts raising questions about that."

Gerth: "She is now running for president, and we felt that people needed to understand how, how she acts in the political arena and, and use that as a basis for deciding whether she is qualified to be president or not. And, you know, in essence, we sort of found that there are two Hillarys. In, in one case, there's the well-informed, the battle-tested, the diligent senator who does her homework. And then we found another Hillary. When it comes to a bump in the road -- whether it is on Iraq or on energy policy or on the environment, where she has a problem, that she plays fast and loose with the facts, she won't admit a mistake, and she sort of, you know, retreats into a shell."



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: clintonlibrary; foreignmoney; hillary; putsomeiceonthat; saudiarabia; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-263 next last
To: LdSentinal

I don’t see this on Drudge and I looked a couple of times. Maybe he took it down?


41 posted on 12/15/2007 8:50:43 AM PST by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
we sort of found that there are two Hillarys

Only two? How many demonmd did Jesus cast out of that guy and put into a herd of pigs? Oh .... wait a moment ....

42 posted on 12/15/2007 8:51:16 AM PST by fella (The proper application of the truth far more important than the knowledge of it's existance."Ike")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
I still think we're better off running against Hillary than against Hussein Obama - HE's the truly dangerous one! and he has a much better chance of appealing to "undecided" - i.e., easily swayed - voters.

That is what the power broker Democrats have realised as well.

We conservatives are torn between that, and having such fun at seeing the Clintons hoisted on their own petard.

43 posted on 12/15/2007 8:52:13 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Perhaps she is still paying her secret police as well.


44 posted on 12/15/2007 8:52:46 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

This is the NYT attempt at lancing the boil before it infects further. The NYT knows that if the clinton machine savages O2 and scuttles his run, blacks will abandon democrats during the general election and sit aside and watch. Dems cannot win without monolithic, blind black support. If blacks witness the savagery of clintonian politics, they might reevaluate their supplicating to democrats and wonder what it was that earned democrats their blind obedience.


45 posted on 12/15/2007 8:52:56 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

I’m not seeing this on Drudge. Was it there? Did he take it down?


46 posted on 12/15/2007 8:53:29 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria
No - Drudge has it on the front page.

NYT Plans Sunday Exclusive on Questionable Clinton Library Donors... Reporter Don Van Natta... Developing...

47 posted on 12/15/2007 8:53:31 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

That only guarantees her poll numbers will go up.


48 posted on 12/15/2007 8:53:50 AM PST by dfwgator (11+7+15=3 Heismans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

LOVE it.

So snatching that one!


49 posted on 12/15/2007 8:54:01 AM PST by kimmie7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Gone now.


50 posted on 12/15/2007 8:55:05 AM PST by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Bet the Clinton Chinese Mafia War Room is working 24/7 on this. Wouldn’t want to be the next plane this scribe is on.

Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops


51 posted on 12/15/2007 8:55:52 AM PST by bray (Let's Bring Christ Back to Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
The Bill Clinton “Libary” is the greatest money laundering operation in history. Remember the movie “The Producers” where Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder con old ladies into investing in their flop Broadway show? They sell well over 100% interest in the show, knowing that it will be a flop. Bill Clinton is doing the same thing, except that it is his soul that is involved. When his “investors” eventually come for his soul, they will find that there is nothing there.
52 posted on 12/15/2007 8:56:58 AM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
The Clintonites have no doubt seen this Drudge teaser.

People leak things to Drudge because they know he has MILLIONS of hits on his site.

As much as the old media despises him (not a "real" journalist dontchaknow) - they know the power he has.

Right now - Hillary's flying monkeys and her lesbian sex-slave Muslim intern Huma are going ape $#^*.


53 posted on 12/15/2007 8:57:06 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
I am very concerned about the Breck Girl and Fat Bill. I have heard BG’s name more in the press in the last 48 hours than the last two months.
54 posted on 12/15/2007 8:57:38 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ ("Has there been a code nine? Have you heard from the Doctor?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Well, that means that we would not longer have to worry about a dangerous Stalinist,(Mrs. Clinton), and would have to start worrying about an incompetent liberal, (Ubama).

Or a ambulance chaser.

55 posted on 12/15/2007 8:57:48 AM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
after she is nominated they can claim “that is old news”

I don't think so. From the beginning everyone has known that Hillary's most fearsome opponent is Hillary, and her negatives will never go away. Therefore, she will always be a high risk candidate in danger of a dramatic melt-down at any stage in the next 8 years.

Consequently it is best to get her out now.

The rest of us can relax more with her gone. Without her, the political market will be better able to balance and weigh the actual qualifications of the remaining candidates who present themselves for office.

56 posted on 12/15/2007 8:58:08 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

If any of these media or political figures do intend to try to take down Hillary, they better have enough of an arsenal to make sure they do the job completely.

Otherwise, if they only wound her, and she does happen to win, they will have hell-ery to pay.


57 posted on 12/15/2007 8:58:21 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
I’m not seeing this on Drudge. Was it there? Did he take it down?

Watch your back, Drudge. I wouldn't take any planes, trains or automobiles for awhile if i were you.

58 posted on 12/15/2007 8:58:36 AM PST by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99
http://bigheaddc.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/huma_hillary.JPG

You're right! It was just there 30 seconds ago too!

Something is going on!

Can you imagine the panic in the Clinton camp? The NY Slimes is getting leaned on BIG TIME by the Clintons right now.

59 posted on 12/15/2007 8:59:40 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: abb
I will be standing next to you. The other grave that I will piss on is Jane Fonda’s. You are invited to that party also if you desire.
60 posted on 12/15/2007 9:00:00 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ ("Has there been a code nine? Have you heard from the Doctor?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson