Posted on 12/15/2007 3:03:13 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Is there anyone these liberal rags won't publish?
Yup, Newsweek has allowed the one, the only, the wannabe Hitler to publish his own diatribe against Zionism and the United States. With such great passages as this where could a liberal rag go wrong?
The American people do not like to see their leaders fall captive to the Zionist network. Surely the American people would prefer U.S.-inspired policies to those perpetrated by the Zionists. No fair-minded American is happy with the present situation. Regrettably, despite the objections of some of America’s elite, personal and political interests—especially those of the present administration—have prevented any action to counter this fatal disease.
Problem is Achmedanutjob, the American people sympathize with the Israeli people over bomb strapping, innocent people killing terrorists like those the Palestinians produce. We don't see Isreal sending in teenagers to bomb a cafe in the Palestinian territories.
It was hoped that the new world would enable all nations, in light of universally accepted humane norms and mutual respect, to advance together, eradicate poverty and injustice, and set aside bitter memories of the past that were nothing but war, bloodshed, violence and tension.
Those hopes were dashed by the United States and its leaders
Is that you KOS? MoveOn? DemocraticUnderground?
Well, at least we all know now that the greater your leftist, communist, socialist, terror loving tilt is the greater the chance you can get something published in Newsweek. And to top it all off, Iran's nuclear bomb dropping days are looking brighter and brighter.....thanks to three men inside our intelligence agencies, Thomas Fingar, Kenneth Brill, and Vann H. Van Diepen.
Less than eight days after it was first published, the NIE report on Iran has delivered its third diplomatic victory for Tehran.
The first accomplishment for Tehran took place on December 11. On that day, Egypt, a close US ally in the Middle East, sent its deputy foreign minister on the first official visit to Iran by any Egyptian official, since relations between the two sides were terminated in after Khomeini’s revolution in 1980. The primary reason for the break in relations was Ayatollah Khomeini’s strong opposition to Anwar Sadat’s peace deal with Israel. The late Iranian leader hated Sadat so much, that he named a street in Tehran after Khaled Eslamboli, his assassin.
Since then, the two countries have only been represented by interest sections in each other’s capitals.
Just a day after that historic visit, Iran received its second post NIE accomplishment, in the form of a Saudi invitation to President Ahmadinejad to attend the Haj ritual in Mecca. This is an honor that has not been bestowed upon any Iranian president, ever.
The Saudis, who were seething at Iran and Ahmadinejad’s role in Iraq and Lebanon, suddenly seem to have taken a shine to him.
The timing of both events, and their message should not be lost on Western leaders. The important question which should be asked is: why do two close US allies feel comfortable enough to make such friendly gestures to Iran, and upgrade its status in the region, at a time when President Bush is trying to do the opposite?
The answer is simple, and important.
It is one thing when the IAEA gives Iran positive points for being “generally truthful about its past.” After all, many argue that the IAEA is a toothless bureaucratic organization, at the mercy of different governments and their political agendas.
But when the multi-billion dollar US intelligence machine declares Iran halted its nuclear weapons program back in 2003, then as far as many Middle Eastern countries are concerned, the “danger” label has been taken off Iran’s nuclear program.
Although many Sunni countries are worried about Tehran’s activities in Iraq and Lebanon, they were more worried about the prospects of war between Washington and Tehran. Now that this danger has dissipated, it is likely that even more countries in the region will decide to engage Iran, as means of influencing its strategy and behavior in the Middle East. This will make the job of imposing sanctions against Iran much more difficult than before.
It will also enable Iran to come out of regional isolation, thus ruining all the celebration that took place in Washington and Jerusalem following the Annapolis show of solidarity.
Unreal. Will the left in this country realize their folly once Iran has the nuke and decides to use it to either blackmail the world or bomb Israel?
I'm betting no.
Damn outrageous!
..
They may realize it, but never admit it. Just like they blame Bush for not seeing "obvious" signs of an impending attack pre-9/11.
The man's an idiot. There is no more "zionist network". The world is being controlled by world business interests on the left, the right and the ME and they are all butting heads. Israel..from what I gather from Jews that have left there is itself a socialist playground.
I wish the moron would get with the program.
Most Jews still vote Democrat. Will they continue to do so after Iran nukes Israel? They probably will.
Newsweek continues to try to lower its circulation numbers.
What a crazy thing to have done. The liberals there just don’t know when to stop.
Maybe this how they internally counter having brought in Rove.
thanks Ernest and justiceseeker93.
Children on Hamas TV Children’s Show: ‘Wipe Out’ Zionists to the Last One
MEMRI | December 13 2007
Posted on 12/12/2007 4:43:19 PM EST by knighthawk
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938567/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.