Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The hidden politics behind Lieberman's endorsement of Republican McCain
MnPost ^ | 17 December 2007 | David Brauer

Posted on 12/17/2007 6:08:18 PM PST by shrinkermd

Lieberman and McCain are bound by their fervent support for the Iraq War; the announcement is timed for New Hampshire, where independents can vote in either party's Jan. 8 primary. However, any political gain will probably be on the margins: in the 2004 Democratic primary, "Joementum" crashed and burned in the Granite State, as voters placed the senator from nearby Connecticut fifth with a mere 9 percent of the vote. Currently, McCain trails Mitt Romney by 16 points in New Hampshire, according to a compendium of polls charted by Pollster.com.

However, the hidden game plan could be to push McCain ahead of Rudy Giuliani as the "less-religious" alternative to Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee heading into February's big-state primaries. According to Pollster.com, McCain recently passed Giuliani in New Hampshire for the first time since last spring.

Although Giuliani remains the national front-runner, his poll numbers have plunged following national headlines about taxpayer expenses related to the then-mayor's affair with his current wife, Judith Nathan. (Lefty blogs have labeled the saga "Sex on the City.") A head-to-head comparison between Giuliani and McCain is uniquely unflattering to the former New York mayor. McCain is the Republican who best neutralizes Giuliani's 9/11 calling card, since the Arizona senator has hung his political hat on the Bush troop surge. Also, there's no comparing the foreign policy experience, especially as Giuliani ran away from the Iraq Study Group

(Excerpt) Read more at minnpost.com ...


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: mccain; mccainlieberman; mcfraud; newhampshire; primary; rinomccain

1 posted on 12/17/2007 6:08:20 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

It’s irrelevant who Lieberman endorses as a Republican. McPain is irrelevant also.


2 posted on 12/17/2007 6:10:33 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Too bad for McCain that he killed himself with his high-profile flop on immigration.


3 posted on 12/17/2007 6:11:42 PM PST by counterpunch (Get Up And Go Fred Go Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Hell of a choice we got this year.

All Mutts(no pun intended)

4 posted on 12/17/2007 6:12:27 PM PST by Dog (Thou shall not worship the backup quarterback.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

About like Kucinich endorsing L. Ron Paullard.


5 posted on 12/17/2007 6:17:54 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nmh

This sets up what I’ve been predicting...a third party run with McCain - Lieberman. That against the true Republican nominee and either Hillary or Barak would be verrrry interesting !!!!
That three way race would be very difficult to handicap, but I think would pretty much rule out a Pres. Hillary of Obama... but a Pres. McCain wouldn’t be too pleasant either...talk about the lessor of two evils!


6 posted on 12/17/2007 6:23:59 PM PST by Froggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Lieberman is not known for hidden game plans. The author is grasping at straws.


7 posted on 12/17/2007 6:31:47 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

You might be insulting L. Ron by comparing him to Ron Paul.

At least L. Ron was in favor of the Fair Tax as early as the 1950s.


8 posted on 12/17/2007 7:22:16 PM PST by bpjam (Harry Reid doesn't even have 32% of my approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog

In a time of serious, crusade war, we have mutts to choose from. ???


9 posted on 12/17/2007 7:27:07 PM PST by txhurl (Yes there were WMDs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Big whoop, this won’t get McInsane any more traction then bald tires on a Mustang.
10 posted on 12/19/2007 2:57:26 PM PST by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson