Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Bests Democrats In Budget Battle - Money for Iraq troops....
US News Political Bulletin ^ | Wednesday, December 19, 2007 | Staff

Posted on 12/19/2007 9:36:02 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

The Senate passed its version of the omnibus spending bill, which will fund government operations for 214 Cabinet departments. Most significantly, the Senate tacked on $70 billion to fund the US war effort in Iraq and Afghanistan. The bill's passage is portrayed today as a big victory for President Bush -- and a defeat for Democrats. USA Today /AP, for example, reports by a 70-25 vote, "Bush and his GOP allies won a major victory in passing a measure providing $70 billion for the wars without restrictions that Democrats had insisted on for weeks." Another AP dispatch says "Bush was ready to sign the bill, assuming the war funding clears the House on Wednesday."

The Washington Post calls the vote "a retreat by Democrats who had vowed a month ago to withhold all money for the Iraq war unless strict timelines for the withdrawal of troops were established." On its website, The Hill says the Senate "handed...Bush a critical victory in the Iraq debate," capping "a year of unsuccessful Democratic attempts to sufficiently chip away at solid GOP support for the war." The Washington Times notes Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid "said the $554 billion spending bill represented a compromise that did not fully satisfy the Democrat-led Congress or the White House."

(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; budgetbattles; bush; defensespending; democrats; iraq; pelosi; reid; victory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Roll Call recounts that "in an unusual move, Senate Democrats split the votes on war funding and domestic spending, even though both will -- upon House passage -- move to the president as one piece of legislation." Dividing the vote "ensured that Democrats opposed to war funding would not have to cast a vote for the overall bill with that funding included." The New York Times says Democratic leaders "conceded they were not happy with having to accept the war money and hew to the president's limit on spending. But they noted they were able to steer money to their priorities, win some spending against White House wishes, and complete all the spending bills, which they saw as a victory in itself."
1 posted on 12/19/2007 9:36:05 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp; Grampa Dave; blam; SunkenCiv; NormsRevenge; kellynla; onyx; Brad's Gramma; Howlin; ...

Victory ping!


2 posted on 12/19/2007 9:37:00 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Another Texas style ass kickin’. Now do something about the Border!


3 posted on 12/19/2007 9:42:14 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Strategery strikes again.


4 posted on 12/19/2007 9:44:04 AM PST by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This guarantees a major US Troops presence in Iraq for at least the duration of this President’s term and if the Rats want to own defeat then all they have to do now is win the White House. If a Rat does win the White House then either they are automatically listed a loser or a liar.
5 posted on 12/19/2007 9:44:10 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

I always like how that Texas ass kicking turns into no action on the border. The President must be pleased as punch today that consevatives are slapping him on the back, as our border remains wide open.

The man has been in office for nearly seven years, and still gets kudos for leaving the border open and our citizens at extreme risk.

Congratulations Mr. President, you sure now how to snooker the masses.


6 posted on 12/19/2007 9:46:52 AM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
...which will fund government operations for 214 Cabinet departments.

214 - WTF???

7 posted on 12/19/2007 9:47:29 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Amen to VICTORY.


8 posted on 12/19/2007 9:48:24 AM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; FARS; Ernest_at_the_Beach; knighthawk; Marine_Uncle; SandRat; Steel Wolf; CAP; ...

Democrat quagmire ping.


9 posted on 12/19/2007 9:56:13 AM PST by elhombrelibre (GEN Petraeus is MAN of the YEAR. Ron Paul is the Jane Fonda of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Good news.

Excellent herding and branding of congress by GW!


10 posted on 12/19/2007 9:58:04 AM PST by Grampa Dave ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
>>...which will fund government operations for 214 Cabinet departments.
214 - WTF???

Maybe if you include the Ministry of Silly Walks? :)

11 posted on 12/19/2007 9:58:24 AM PST by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

The phrase ..victory has a hundred fathers but defeat is an orphan...has been turned on its head.

In this case, W is victorious alone and Harry, nasty Nancy and the moon bat left have been defeated.

Heh heh...


12 posted on 12/19/2007 10:01:55 AM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: y6162
Over at the du and kos websites the loonies are into self flagellation.

They "feel" betrayed and after they voted the leftys into the majority.

13 posted on 12/19/2007 10:06:52 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: y6162
Exactly, but do not be surprised that the traitors next year will try to stupidly to claim some credit for VICTORY but they will laughed at by the majority of voters no matter how hard they and their media try to spin it for their favor.
14 posted on 12/19/2007 10:06:59 AM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

“Lame Duck President” is the “Lamest and Dumbest” expression in American politics and President Bush proved it as such.


15 posted on 12/19/2007 10:13:26 AM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

“Over at the du and kos websites the loonies are into self flagellation”

tsk tsk..I feel so bad for them...=)


16 posted on 12/19/2007 10:13:32 AM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

a victory in the sense of that it funds the war and assures victory. It’s a defeat in the fact that the Demo’s loaded it up with so much pork and defunded the fence how can this be a good thing?

the gov’t waste continues............


17 posted on 12/19/2007 10:23:13 AM PST by Rezod21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; Marine_Uncle; jveritas; Allegra; y6162
From the Blogosphere (Flopping Aces ):

More Good News from Iraq
Posted by Mike on December 19, 2007 at 7:36 AM

****************************EXCERPT***********************

More bad news for defeatist Dems and Al Queda!

The latest quarterly report, mandated by Congress as a condition of war funding for Iraq, is out. It's bad news for those who still insist the surge isn't working, or that U.S. troops are mired in a civil war or that there is no political progress.

What a shame! We're actually winning.

What is winning? As defined by President Bush and stated at the beginning of the report:

Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq
December 2007
Report to Congress
In accordance with the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act 2007
(Section 9010, Public Law 109-289)
Department of Defense (PDF)

The strategic goal of the United States in Iraq remains a unified, democratic and federal Iraq that can govern, defend and sustain itself and is an ally in the war on terror.
...
The number of security incidents has fallen significantly and is now at levels last seen in the summer of 2005. Although ethno-sectarian violence continues to be a concern, overall civilian casualties, enemy attacks and total improvised explosive device attacks have decreased markedly over the reporting period.
What Americans care most about and are anxious to see is further proof of the decline in violence. Three charts illustrate that perfectly:

See the Link for some powerful Visuals....

18 posted on 12/19/2007 10:24:33 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
A two-term US Presidents is only a lame ducks in one sense. He cannot be elected again. In the meantime, he needn’t pander or curry favor to get elected again. So the limits of being or running for president again must be weighed against the freedom to act without fear of polls and voter rejection in the next election. The mad mullahs might want to consider how liberated situation is for Bush and how it allows him options as he assesses how best to protect the American people and our allies in the world.
19 posted on 12/19/2007 10:25:15 AM PST by elhombrelibre (GEN Petraeus is MAN of the YEAR. Ron Paul is the Jane Fonda of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Two stories here.

1) Bush has more power and popularity then MSM conventional wisdom.

2) Government will try to spend money to prop up economy to stay in power. Govenments try to manipulate the economy to stay in power, part of the reason for ‘the 4 year cycle’ in America for the last 50 years.


20 posted on 12/19/2007 10:26:59 AM PST by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson