Tancredo wanted to support a winner so he supported Romney!
Quite simple.
So one is supposed to support something for which you disagree rather than something to which you attest?
Moronic.
Check out my definition of “front runner”
And, as everyone knows, this whole thing at the end of the day is JUST ABOUT WINNING, nothing else!
That is why we in the GOP chose a "WINNER" in 2000 over everyone else.
We got the Great president, GWB. He won it for us.
And we have had excellent enforcement of our borders for seven years. After all, this is what winners give us, is national security and sovereignty. Our country is in solid shape, we have seen illegal immigration flow stopped and reversed, and there have been no murders of Americans on our soil by illegal aliens, all under the leadership of our "winner."
I see your logic. Count me on board.
So he cast his own beliefs and positions aside?
Sorry, you may wish that to be the reason, but it isn't, I think.
Oh that’s brilliant...NOT!
Yes, that is quite simple-minded.
I assume Tancredo voted for Clinton in 1996, since he was clearly going to be the winner.
(Dole was a great man, but a terrible nominee.)