Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Those that know Willard the best, know he is a liar and a nightmare for anyone aligning with him politically.

Even a backstabber like John McCain would do less damage to the GOP.

1 posted on 12/22/2007 12:18:57 PM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Ol' Sparky

Consider the source of this article.


2 posted on 12/22/2007 12:19:36 PM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Romney should’ve ran against John Kerry or Ted Kennedy where he could do some good. Him running for President is a waste of his talents.


3 posted on 12/22/2007 12:20:28 PM PST by Maelstorm (Being a tax payer is like being Santa Claus to greedy children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

His “core opposition,” according to Rasmussen, is 47%—just like Hillary (and five points higher than Rudy).


5 posted on 12/22/2007 12:23:43 PM PST by Petronski (Reject the liberal superfecta: huckabee, romney, giuliani, mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
You're right. McCain has already extraordinarily damaged the GOP with his wackness. The only thing left for him is to stab the American people in the back.

Oh wait...

6 posted on 12/22/2007 12:24:49 PM PST by rintense (Thompson/Hunter 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
Romney Fairytale Script
Once upon a time there was a man named Mitt who said a very bad thing:
Romney: “I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country”
Then he thought of campaigning in Utah and said something different. “I am NOT pro-choice!”
But when he came back to liberal Massachusetts:
Romney: “I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose.”
Then in 2004 he magically became pro-life, but only six months later:
Romney: “I am absolutely committed to my promise to maintain the status quo with regards to law related to abortion and choice.”
The spell must have worn off.
Now he’s on the campaign trail again, and he’s back to being pro-life.
Romney: “I was pro-choice; I’m pro-life.” … “I changed my position” … “I never said I was pro-choice.”
Narrator: BR: Mitt Romney, willing to sacrifice children, lying for your vote.
Paid for by American Right-to-Life Action.

7 posted on 12/22/2007 12:26:59 PM PST by Petronski (Reject the liberal superfecta: huckabee, romney, giuliani, mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
All the love on FR today is just giving me that warm Christmas feeling!
8 posted on 12/22/2007 12:27:48 PM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Beyond the reasons mentioned here, his Kerry-like equivocation, there’s also the issue of spending ten years of his adult life in a racist church that discriminated against blacks — behavior he still refuses to say was wrong.

Since Mitt was a loyal, faithful Mormon and a missionary, we’re dopes if we think Mitt never defended the church’s racist doctrinal policies in conversation or preaching — and the Democrats are going to have people in standby who can remember it.


9 posted on 12/22/2007 12:28:42 PM PST by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

democrats are working overtime to defeat him. Good news for Mitt! They must have concluded that it will be Mitt against Hillary, and it aint looking good.


10 posted on 12/22/2007 12:28:49 PM PST by tompster76 (Amnesty: No aspirations of citizenship to illegals - ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
He’s the Dr. Kevorkian of Republicanism. Don’t stay in the room alone with him. You nod off just once and you won't get back up.
12 posted on 12/22/2007 12:30:43 PM PST by Leisler (RNC, RINO National Committee. Always was, always will be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

This shows they are afraid of Romney. And why I support him.


13 posted on 12/22/2007 12:32:14 PM PST by razzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

You’re carrying water for Hillary with your attacks on President Romney.


14 posted on 12/22/2007 12:33:28 PM PST by Dragonspirit (We fight it out as good friends now, but in 2008 we UNITE against our enemy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

The Union Leader has officially endorsed John McPain, so what’s your point?


16 posted on 12/22/2007 12:37:08 PM PST by khnyny (Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed. Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
An check into my posting history from years ago will show I am no fan of John McCain, but given the choice of Rudy or McCain the choice would be hands down McCain or sit out.

Fred Dalton Thompson is my hands down choice for America!

18 posted on 12/22/2007 12:38:56 PM PST by ImpBill ("America ... Where are you now?" --Greg Adams--Brownsville, TX --On the other Front Line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Here’s the link for their endorsement letter from the publisher:

http://unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=John+McCain+is+the+man+to+lead+America&articleId=dfca72c2-4a23-49e5-943f-1d85256f45cc

Btw, since the original owners of the paper died and the paper has changed hands, it has become less conservative.


19 posted on 12/22/2007 12:39:42 PM PST by khnyny (Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed. Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Sour grapes from a political loser.


20 posted on 12/22/2007 12:40:16 PM PST by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Reposting this by Jane Swift? Didn’t you or someone else do that on December 11th? Ah well, enjoy.


26 posted on 12/22/2007 12:46:13 PM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
Romney is the least of the candidates, IMO. His flip-flopping is one thing, and the rats will certainly exploit it, but I am more concerned that Mitt will wither in the face of criticisms from the dying, socialist Democrat newsrooms like he did when he ran against Ted Kennedy. In that senate race Mitt started out sounding like a conservative (and actually outpolling Kennedy att one point) to being "liberal-lite" (and losing in a landslide).

Watch Romney's "deer-in-the-headlights" debate performance and see for yourself.
Mitt found himself completely on the defensive. This was the debate that finished him off.

30 posted on 12/22/2007 12:54:39 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj

It’s easy to agree with this article, but the author of it is not strong on credibility.


33 posted on 12/22/2007 1:05:43 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

This article is dead on target. Underneath the Romney Millions of $$$$ is a candidate that will say and do anything to win. He has absolutely no sense of honor.


35 posted on 12/22/2007 1:08:14 PM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Even a liberal Republican like Jane Swift can see the big problem with Romney.


36 posted on 12/22/2007 1:13:25 PM PST by Fred (The Demoroid Party is the Nadir of Nilhilism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson