Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Get Ready for a Democratic Era [Barf Alert!]
washingtonpost.com ^ | 12/23/07 | John B. Judis and Ruy Teixeira

Posted on 12/22/2007 3:57:15 PM PST by melt

Karl Rove's grandest aspiration was to create a Republican majority that would dominate American politics for a generation or more. But as the effects of his distinctive brand of fear-mongering fade, it's the Democrats who are poised to become the country's majority party -- and perhaps for a long time to come.

Many conservatives have insisted that the Democrats' wins in the 2006 midterm elections, as well as their recent pickups in some 2007 races, were mere blips. They wish. Political, ideological, demographic and economic trends are all leading toward durable Democratic majorities in Congress, control of most statehouses and, very possibly, the end of the decades-old GOP hammerlock on the electoral college.

This sea change is the result of the electorate's disenchantment with conservative Republicans, beginning in the 1990s. The old conservative majority, as given voice by Ronald Reagan and Newt Gingrich, sought to cut federal regulation, to privatize government operations and to slash social spending. But by late in Bill Clinton's presidency, broad public majorities had come to back environmental and consumer regulation, as well as significant new government spending on health care and education. As President Bush discovered in 2005, the public also disliked attempts to gut Social Security.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; democratera; democrats; elections; idiotsinmedia; surrender; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Title should more correctly read: "Get Ready for a Democratic Eerie".

God help us.

1 posted on 12/22/2007 3:57:17 PM PST by melt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: melt
This sea change is the result of the electorate's disenchantment with conservative Republicans, beginning in the 1990s

No, the change is due to Republicans acting like Democrats.

2 posted on 12/22/2007 3:59:21 PM PST by imdref
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt
Get ready for a Democratic Error. If Hillary is nominated a Republican will be in the White House after Bush leaves.
3 posted on 12/22/2007 4:01:20 PM PST by hflynn ( Soros would not make any sense even if he spelled his name backwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

I firmly believe that half of those that disapprove of Bush wish he was more conservative, not less.


4 posted on 12/22/2007 4:02:49 PM PST by neodad (USS Wabash (AOR 5) The Wabash Cannonball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

What this jerk doesn’t realize is that the ordinary person is sick and tired of Congress’ shenanigans under RAT control. The RATS may take the WH in 08 since the PUBS have nothing running that’s better but Congress will go PUB in ‘08.


5 posted on 12/22/2007 4:02:54 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melt

But my kids tell me that college kids are becoming more conservative, rebelling against the college status quo. The professors are all liberal so to rebel the kids have to go more conservative, but they are going for RON PAUL not the others.


6 posted on 12/22/2007 4:08:30 PM PST by buffyt (Free Border Agents Ramos and Campean before Christmas PLEASE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imdref
I guess they forgot about the Blue Dog Democrats that are walking the fine line between reelection and pleasing the House D-rat masters.
7 posted on 12/22/2007 4:08:39 PM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
What this jerk doesn’t realize is that the ordinary person is sick and tired of Congress’ shenanigans under RAT control. The RATS may take the WH in 08 since the PUBS have nothing running that’s better but Congress will go PUB in ‘08.

Those who don't learn from history are condemned to repeat its mistakes.

Rhetoric like this is eerily reminiscent of what was being said at the time Bill Clinton won in 1992. We know exactly how long that "enduring Democrat Era" lasted: 2 years.

If the Dems want to get all overconfident, fine with me. What they don't seem to get - ever - is that the average American centrist voter (the one who ultimately decides political control of the nation) supports things like "universal health care" and "enviromentalism" only in the abstract; once the government starts doing things that are tangible, such as increasing taxes to pay for it, or lowering their quality of life to support it, they react in a VERY negative manner.
8 posted on 12/22/2007 4:11:03 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Very much wish that G.W. Bush was more conservative especially on the illegal immigration problem.


9 posted on 12/22/2007 4:11:45 PM PST by xtinct (I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: melt
Ruy Teixeira, a fellow at the Center for American Progress

Soros is heard from through one of his well-funded outlets.

10 posted on 12/22/2007 4:12:00 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

The problem is a republican hasn’t won California, Illinois, Pennsylvanian, or New Jersey since 1988.

That means that every republican goes into an election 112 electoral votes in the hole.


11 posted on 12/22/2007 4:12:01 PM PST by Perdogg (Fred Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: melt
This sea change is the result of the electorate's disenchantment with conservative Republicans,...

This sea change is the result of the electorate's disenchantment with conservative Republicans, who tote more of a political attitude rather than a conservative attitude.

The perfect definition of a RINO.

12 posted on 12/22/2007 4:14:41 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
Very much wish that G.W. Bush was more conservative especially on the illegal immigration problem.

Thanks be to God that we have him in these times however.

13 posted on 12/22/2007 4:16:47 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

The article fails to mention most of the Democrats recent gains have been made by their candidates taking more Conservative positions on some issues.


14 posted on 12/22/2007 4:18:05 PM PST by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
The RATS may take the WH in 08 since the PUBS have nothing running that’s better but Congress will go PUB in ‘08.

Your optimism is worthy of praise. /s

15 posted on 12/22/2007 4:20:10 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Bush’s disapproval rating with conservatives is probably higher than DemocRats. We support his war efforts, but we all know that the problem with illegal aliens is also a long term war that we haven’t even started fighting.
This election is about only one thing..illegal immigration.
No Republican will be elected without a firm stand on that.
If we have to fight the immigration issue with pressure on every congress criter every day..we will..


16 posted on 12/22/2007 4:21:49 PM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
What they don't seem to get - ever -...

Is intelligence and focus with concern for what is best for America.

17 posted on 12/22/2007 4:24:25 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: imdref
This sea change is the result of the electorate's disenchantment with conservative Republicans, beginning in the 1990s

No, the change is due to Republicans acting like Democrats.

Why is this so hard to understand?

When Republicans run as conservatives, they win. Because conservative voters turn out for them in droves.

When Republicans act as Democrats, they lose. Because conservative voters stay home.

The balance of power in virtually every election since 1980 has thus been held by the conservative voter. If we come out, Republicans win. If we don't, the Democrats win.

To pretend otherwise, as Judis and Teixeira are, is simply leftist twaddle.

You would think the GOP would've figured it out by now...

18 posted on 12/22/2007 4:24:53 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
Bush’s disapproval rating with conservatives is probably higher than DemocRats.

You're being a dream weaver.

19 posted on 12/22/2007 4:26:07 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: melt

Well The Wash Post is bailing water hard to keep the sinking Congressional RATS from looking all wet.

RAT era indeed. The have nothing they can actually truthfully represent to voters and survive an election. They have to deceive, distort ansd outright lie.

Fraid its more like a RAT’s Ass Second they have gotten.


20 posted on 12/22/2007 4:33:47 PM PST by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson