Date published taken from the page source, so it might not be accurate. Doesn't look like it was ever posted though.
Anyone in Green Bay had this done to them yet?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: LibWhacker
How do we know someone won’t use those fingerprints in theft identity?
2 posted on
12/23/2007 3:31:30 PM PST by
freekitty
((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
To: LibWhacker
Citizens do have the right to say no. "They could say no and not have to worry about getting arrested," defense attorney Jackson Main said. "On the other hand, I'm like everybody else. When a police officer tells me to do something, I'm going to do it whether I have the right to say no or not."
You might just end up on the hot end of a taser.
3 posted on
12/23/2007 3:32:14 PM PST by
kinoxi
To: LibWhacker
OK,you’re not required to provide a fingerprint.Those who are stopped should be told this in clear terms by the cop making the request.
4 posted on
12/23/2007 3:35:47 PM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
To: LibWhacker
Freedom comes at a cost. Law-abiding citizens may have to be willing to go to jail to fight this kind of tyranny. But at some point, either you fight it, or the tyrants just tighten the noose.
5 posted on
12/23/2007 3:36:11 PM PST by
IronJack
(=)
To: LibWhacker
Unless the police are arresting me and take me to the lock up I will not "give" them my fingerprints.
And yes, I realize that not "giving" them my fingerprints may result in just that.
Not because I'm afraid of some database. Shoot, being a veteran my fingerprints are already on file.
Because they have no need of them for a minor violation.
6 posted on
12/23/2007 3:37:16 PM PST by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: LibWhacker
What’s next?? Blood samples and DNA verification for speeding tickets??
Another slippery slope...
7 posted on
12/23/2007 3:38:59 PM PST by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts...)
To: LibWhacker
Just another step on the road to totalitarianism.
8 posted on
12/23/2007 3:40:18 PM PST by
SouthTexas
(Have a Merry and Blessed Christmas.)
To: LibWhacker
No fingerprint, well then how about a bit of tazer?
11 posted on
12/23/2007 3:42:53 PM PST by
Mark was here
(Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
To: LibWhacker
How do I prove I’m not an illegal? Well “official” documentation of course. How do I prove that the “official” documentation isn’t forged? Well fingerprints of course? Retinal scans? Urine tests? But of course I have the right to refuse... if I don’t want to drive a car, or if I don’t want to work. Like it or not, that’s the path ahead I expect.
12 posted on
12/23/2007 3:44:07 PM PST by
rhombus
To: LibWhacker
I remember reading that when Social Security was first proposed way back when, that most Americans did NOT want a government number to be used to identify them. The government, of course, said that would never happen.
Fast Forward. These days you can't even open an account ANYWHERE without that Social Security Number.
To: LibWhacker
An’t no way in hell you’re going to get mine this way.
Sheeple - that’s another story.
14 posted on
12/23/2007 3:47:05 PM PST by
txzman
(Jer 23:29)
To: LibWhacker
Are Green Bay police permitted to ask about legal residency in the country?
18 posted on
12/23/2007 3:54:39 PM PST by
VR-21
To: LibWhacker
And what if I refuse to be fingerprinted?
19 posted on
12/23/2007 3:57:40 PM PST by
Ouderkirk
(Hillary = Senator Incitatus, Clintigula's whore...er, horse.)
To: LibWhacker
If you want law enforcement to crack down on the illegals, they are going to have to have the tools to identify a citizen from a non citizen. Are you ready for it?
20 posted on
12/23/2007 4:02:05 PM PST by
kempo
(I)
To: LibWhacker
Police stress that the prints are just to make sure you are who you claim to be and do not go into any kind of database; they simply stay on the ticket for future reference if the identity is challenged.Granted the "information" on the ticket is entered into a database, and if your fingerprint is on the ticket and cannot be part of that info unless it is scanned, but many databases use a scan type system to record documentation.
How difficult would it be to pull the ticket and check a fingerprint?
24 posted on
12/23/2007 4:16:02 PM PST by
Popman
To: LibWhacker
"On the other hand, I'm like everybody else. When a police officer tells me to do something, I'm going to do it whether I have the right to say no or not." These days, saying 'no' might get you tased. Regardless, it seems to me that this fingerprinting scheme is a clear violation of both the 4th and 5th Amendments.
25 posted on
12/23/2007 4:16:56 PM PST by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
To: basil
Have you seen this? Outrageous!
26 posted on
12/23/2007 4:18:10 PM PST by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: Travis McGee; hiredhand; joanie-f; Lurker; Larry Lucido; Horatio Gates
Oh yer gonna love this.......
27 posted on
12/23/2007 4:19:54 PM PST by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: LibWhacker
38 posted on
12/23/2007 4:34:54 PM PST by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(Global Warming : A perpetuation of Lies Levied onto sheep to give up their Fleece)
To: LibWhacker
They took my footprint when I was born, and my mother’s fingerprint. Both without permission.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson