You are absolutely right, and here's proof:
Posted on 12/26/2007 5:04:53 AM PST by billorites
bump
Oh boo hoo, we’re all so bad. This is the worst ever...yada, yada, yada. Has anyone read history? We do our forefather’s proud. We are their children and this is the way politics has always been conducted in the shinning city on the hill.
Hey Kewpie, ask if they should trust the enabling wife of an alleged serial rapist.
Did they SEE that picture ? My mean old Communist grandma didn't look that decrepit and ugly at 90.
Fair enough.
Given that it's not possible for me to like her less.
I've seen fascimilies of old newspapers and cartoons from the eighteen-hundreds, and some of them were savage. Men used to duel over them.
That said, however, I'd sure like to see the press draw back form the 24/7 All Sex 'N Sleaze Mode they seem to be in.
I guess the real news- terror, the spread of Islam, nukes in North Korea and Iran, the illegal invasion- are just too scary for them to bother mentioning...
Yeah, it’s irritating that there are people that seem to believe in the “good ‘ol days” political races were substantive, and kind.
Accusing your opponent of having illigitimate children was a routine aspect of 19th Century presidential campaigns, for example.
NO. A bookcase.
A BOOKCASE.
Jeeze...
This wall-to-wall press coverage is designed to degrade our president. It started earlier than usual and receives greater coverage than usual.
The nastiest election campaign, ever:
....or so they keep telling us.
So does this mean Kathleen Parker will vote for Hillary Clinton? Scary thought. If so, maybe this was all a plot from the Hillary camp to make her a victim.........yet again. No, that would be conspiracy theory, and Hillary is not like that.
Of course the biggest rift in American politics resulted in a civil war but those who bemoan today’s “nastiness” always seem to forget those details. And then before that Jackson was a bigamist for marrying a divorced woman before the divorce was final and then there was Buchannan whose roommate Rufus King was often derided as Miss Nancy and/or Aunt Fancy. ;-)
WRONG, it didn't make me like her more but I don't think it is possible for me to like her AT ALL. It has nothing to do with her face either. It has to do with the fact that she is pure EVIL.
“Hey Kewpie, ask if they should trust the enabling wife of an alleged serial rapist.”
Yes!!! Follow-up question for Perky Katie: ask Hillary!666 if there’s inherent risk in having a confirmed sex addict, serial adulterer/sexual harrasser and likely rapist in the White House. And what does covering up for said spouse say about Mrs. Clinton’s character?
“This picture makes me like her more.”
I have a mental picture of the kind of woman who would like Hillary! more because of this picture: perpetually angry overweight menopausal women who have a beef against men in general, white Republican men in particular. In short, they are probably hags just like Hillary.
Kathleen misses the point of the hag photo: Almost all previous photos/video of Hillary! had been heavily enhanced to make her appear to be something she isn’t. Hillary is as phony on the outside as she is on the inside, and photo spotlighted this. Besides, “hag” is more about how a woman acts than what she looks like. (Helen Thomas excepted LOL)
You are absolutely right, and here's proof:
IMHO, I think they are trying to degrade the process so that we can have a dictator or a Chairman. How about Chairman, Comrade Hillary?
....or so they keep telling us.
I think I've heard that claim made every four years since 1964.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.