Posted on 12/27/2007 5:10:55 AM PST by billorites
If Clinton wins -- it would mean there are too damned many fools voting in America to be overcome by my vote given while holding my nose.....
I'm too damned old to vote for the lesser evil....
If neither political party can present an acceptable candidate - I simply won't vote..
Neither Clinton or McCain are acceptable to me.....and I would be very disappointed in America is these two were put forward as the BEST the nation could produce...
No thanks - I'll opt out.
Etch-a-sketch, please.
Instead, at the time, Fred was busy hiring and firing campaign staffers, setting up a website, and Huck stole his thunder by coming in second in the straw poll. Now Fred's fighting for 3rd place in Iowa, with no shot at NH or MI. So he'll be limping into SC where, last I checked, he's trailing.
Anyway, it's too bad. Because I don't like Rudy. The more I learn about Romney, the less I like him. Huckabee makes me want to hurl. It's an ugly looking field. I'm afraid we may end up with Huckabee.
Told ya. See #61.
As much as I hate to say it, the frontrunner is STILL Rootie. Nothing has changed except the date and time and Rudy and Hillary are STILL likely to face each other.
Personally I’d much prefer Romney and believe he still has a chance. The Huckster will fade and Mclame is a flash that will alwo fade out.
A lot of polls show McCain beating Obama or Edwards handily; most polls show McCain vs. Clinton close or give McCain the edge. He appeals strongly to the center. And he’d give Congress h*ll for the pork that Bush was complaining about this morning.
I hate to say it, but Novak just might be right. None of these guys inspire confidence, let alone just plain inspire.
All the (media) polls you site would “magically” and immediately turn against McCain were he ever to secure the nomination.
It has nothing to do with the other candidates. It is John’s turn and the MSM will see to it that he is the one that goes against the Dem.
I ruled McVain out years ago. That will not change.
Ya, it sure worked great in 2000.
I'd count myself among these. If it came down to Giuliani, Huckabee, Romney or McCain... well... Giuliani's too liberal on too many issues, Huckabee is a slick, corrupt fascist, and Romney is as phony as they come. Compared to those three, McCain isn't looking so bad. He's far from perfect, but I'm thinking he may be the best of the top 4.
Where is Ronald Reagan when we need him most?
He's dead, sir... just let it go.
Romney cannot win. The LDS thing is imho a fatal flaw. I have heard too many Christians who have said they would elect a Jew but not a Mormon. I still don’t totally get it, and have gotten some reasons from various FReepers. But LDS is a huge problem.
“If...”?
Good possibility. And our Supreme Court would have two new moderate/liberal judges, instead of two new solid conservative ones.
Are you talking about this as his kind of h*ll he will give Congress.... Whose pockets do you you think he will pick for his NEW and BETTER than a Hillry present? haha
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1944627/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.